Patent US4144134A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4144134A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for detection of bacterial concentration by luminescence
Assignee: Vitatect Corp
•
Filing: 1977-01-31
•
Granted: 1979-03-13
•
Expires: 1997-01-31
Abstract
Abstract A method for detecting low levels of microbial cells in samples of fluids and degraded solids. The non-microbial reactive materials in a sample are solubilized by selective use of enzymes and the sample is filtered to remove the liquid portion of the solubilized materials while retaining the microbial cells on the filter. The microbial cells are then ruptured to expose undiluted reactive material which is then contacted with reagent material on the filter to cause a luminescent reaction. The strength of the resulting luminescence is measured as an indication of the concentration of microbial cells in the sample.
Inventors
- 👤 Chris J. Plakas
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 23:19
CPC Classifications
C; C12; C12Q; C12Q1/00; C12Q1/02; C12Q1/04; C12Q2304/00; C12Q2304/60
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
153 words
A method for detecting the presence of microbial cells in a sample comprising a mixture of microbial cells and non-microbial cells comprising the steps of: (A) combining the sample with an enzyme which ruptures the walls of the non-microbial cells to extract non-microbial reactive material contained therein, (B) removing the non-microbial reactive material extracted from the non-microbial cells by filtering said sample on a filter surface to eliminate the non-microbial reactive material from non-microbial cells and to produce a residue on the filter surface containing microbial cells, (C) rupturing the walls of the microbial cells on the filter surface to extract and retain microbial reactive material contained therein on the filter surface, (D) combining on the filter surface the microbial reactive material with a luminescence-causing reagent to generate light as a function of the amount of reactive material thus combined, and (E) detecting the amount of light thus generated on the filter surface.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
153 words
A method for detecting the presence of microbial cells in a sample comprising a mixture of microbial cells and non-microbial cells comprising the steps of: (A) combining the sample with an enzyme which ruptures the walls of the non-microbial cells to extract non-microbial reactive material contained therein, (B) removing the non-microbial reactive material extracted from the non-microbial cells by filtering said sample on a filter surface to eliminate the non-microbial reactive material from non-microbial cells and to produce a residue on the filter surface containing microbial cells, (C) rupturing the walls of the microbial cells on the filter surface to extract and retain microbial reactive material contained therein on the filter surface, (D) combining on the filter surface the microbial reactive material with a luminescence-causing reagent to generate light as a function of the amount of reactive material thus combined, and (E) detecting the amount of light thus generated on the filter surface.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the steps A and B further comprise sequential steps for rupturing different types of non-microbial cells according to their progressive sensitivity to extracting means.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
153 words
A method using a luminescent reaction for optically detecting the presence of microbial cells in a sample comprising a mixture of microbial and non-microbial cells comprising the steps of: (a) rupturing non-microbial cells in the sample using an enzyme in order to facilitate filtration and to extract non-microbial reactive material from non-microbial cells from said sample without affecting microbial cells, (B) filtering said sample on a filter surface to eliminate the non-microbial reactive material from non-microbial cells and to produce a residue on the filter surface containing microbial cells, (C) rupturing microbial cells in said residue while on said filter surface to extract undiluted microbial reactive material on said filter surface, (D) bringing undiluted microbial reactive material and reagent material into contact for reaction and consequent light emission, and (E) detecting and recording the amount of light thus emitted as an indication of the quantity of microbial reactive material present in said sample.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
153 words
A method using a luminescent reaction for optically detecting the presence of microbial cells in a sample comprising a mixture of microbial and non-microbial cells comprising the steps of: (a) rupturing non-microbial cells in the sample using an enzyme in order to facilitate filtration and to extract non-microbial reactive material from non-microbial cells from said sample without affecting microbial cells, (B) filtering said sample on a filter surface to eliminate the non-microbial reactive material from non-microbial cells and to produce a residue on the filter surface containing microbial cells, (C) rupturing microbial cells in said residue while on said filter surface to extract undiluted microbial reactive material on said filter surface, (D) bringing undiluted microbial reactive material and reagent material into contact for reaction and consequent light emission, and (E) detecting and recording the amount of light thus emitted as an indication of the quantity of microbial reactive material present in said sample.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 3 where the sample contains fruit or vegetable products and the enzyme is selected from the group of pectic enzymes in order to degrade the pectins present in cellular structures of such fruit or vegetable products.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the sample contains starch and the enzyme is selected from the group of diastase enzymes in order to degrade such starch samples.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the sample contains starch and the enzyme is selected from the group of amylase enzymes in order to degrade such starch samples.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the sample contains proteins and the enzyme is selected from the group of protease enzymes in order to solubilize such proteins.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the step of rupturing microbial cells in said residue while on said filter surface is accomplished by introducing extremely small volumes of less than 0.025 ml of extractant to rupture the microbial cells, this extractant being evaporated and absorbed by the filter material and thus leaving no liquid to dilute the extracted material.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 3 wherein rupturing microbial cells in said residue while on said filter surface is accomplished by introducing gas and vapor fumes into the filter unit to rupture the microbial cells in a dry environment.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the step of filtering said sample on a filter surface comprises filtering to remove all liquid portion of said sample and rinsing the residue to remove all non-microbial reactive material, in order to retain on the filter surface a sample residue containing microbial cells.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 3 wherein bringing microbial reactive material and reagent material into contact comprises applying liquid reagent evenly over the undiluted microbial reactive material carried on the filter.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 3 wherein bringing microbial reactive material and reagent material into contact further comprises introducing reagent and microbial reactive material in thin layers to allow oxygen supply to all microbial reactive molecules during the reaction.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the amount of light is below the level of endogenous light of the reagent.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-03-12 | 1982-09-11 | 1983-03-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-03-12 | 1986-09-11 | 1987-03-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-03-12 | 1990-09-11 | 1991-03-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |