Patent US4112147A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4112147A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of manufacturing a monolithic crystal filter
Assignee: AT&T Inc
•
Filing: 1977-05-13
•
Granted: 1978-09-05
•
Expires: 1997-05-13
Abstract
Abstract A method of manufacturing a monolithic crystal filter, and particularly a filter having a high midband frequency (e.g., 20 MHz or above) and a wide resonator coupling (e.g., 4 KHz or above), involves the plating of additional electrode material onto a pair of base-plated split electrodes on one side of a crystal wafer to establish a desired coupling between resonators of the filter. Additional electrode material then is plated onto a base-plated solid electrode on the opposite side of the crystal wafer to establish a desired midband frequency of the filter. When the electrodes are plated in this sequence, the resonator coupling decreases substantially during the additional plating of the split electrodes, but remains essentially constant, within tolerance limits, during the plating of the solid electrode, whereby further adjustment of the coupling is not necessary.
Inventors
- 👤 Edwin C. Thompson
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 20:35
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03H; H03H3/00; H03H3/007; H03H3/02; H03H3/04; H03H9/00; H03H9/46; H03H9/54; H03H9/56; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T29/00; Y10T29/42
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
159 words
The method of manufacturing a monolithic crystal filter, which comprises the sequential steps of: plating electrode material onto opposite sides of a crystal wafer to form a pair of split electrodes on one side of the wafer and a solid electrode on the other side of the wafer in superimposed relationship, to produce a device having an initial resonator coupling greater than a desired resonator coupling and having an initial midband frequency above a desired midband frequency; plating additional electrode material onto the pair of split electrodes to narrow the initial resonator coupling of the device to a desired resonator coupling and to decrease the frequency of the device from the initial midband frequency to an intermediate midband frequency which is below the initial midband frequency and above the desired midband frequency; and plating additional electrode material onto the solid electrode to decrease the midband frequency of the device from the intermediate midband frequency to the desired midband frequency.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
159 words
The method of manufacturing a monolithic crystal filter, which comprises the sequential steps of: plating electrode material onto opposite sides of a crystal wafer to form a pair of split electrodes on one side of the wafer and a solid electrode on the other side of the wafer in superimposed relationship, to produce a device having an initial resonator coupling greater than a desired resonator coupling and having an initial midband frequency above a desired midband frequency; plating additional electrode material onto the pair of split electrodes to narrow the initial resonator coupling of the device to a desired resonator coupling and to decrease the frequency of the device from the initial midband frequency to an intermediate midband frequency which is below the initial midband frequency and above the desired midband frequency; and plating additional electrode material onto the solid electrode to decrease the midband frequency of the device from the intermediate midband frequency to the desired midband frequency.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method as recited in claim 1, in which the monolithic crystal filter is to have a final midband frequency on the order of 20 MHz or above and a final resonator coupling on the order of 4 KHz or above.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method as recited in claim 1 in which the split electrodes are plated on the crystal wafer with a gap of 30 mils or less between the split electrodes.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as recited in claim 1 in which the split electrodes are plated on the crystal wafer with a gap of 5-30 mils between the split electrodes.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as recited in claim 1 in which the major portion of the decrease in the midband frequency is accomplished during the additional-plating of the pair of split electrodes to establish the desired resonator coupling.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method as recited in claim 1 in which the solid electrode has edges which extend outwardly beyond corresponding edges of the split electrodes.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
79 words
The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the split electrodes and the solid electrode form first and second resonators with the crystal wafer, and which further comprises: plating additional material onto the pair of split electrodes individually to prebalance the first and second resonators at a selected frequency below the initial midband frequency prior to plating additional material onto the split electrodes and the solid electrode in sequence to establish the desired resonator coupling and midband frequency, respectively.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
92 words
The method as recited in claim 1, which further comprises: measuring the difference in open circuit resonant frequencies of first and second resonators of the base-plated crystal wafer; and plating additional material onto the pair of split electrodes individually to prebalance the first and second resonators at a selected frequency below the initial midband frequency prior to plating additional material onto the split electrodes and the solid electrode to establish the desired resonator coupling and midband frequency, respectively, when the difference between the open circuit resonant frequencies exceeds a preselected tolerance limit.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method as recited in claim 8, in which the monolithic crystal filter is to have a final midband frequency of less than 20 MHz and a final resonator coupling of less than 4 KHz.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method as recited in claim 9, in which the maximum preselected tolerance difference between the open circuit resonant frequencies is 10% of the final resonator coupling of the filter.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3549414A
Cited
US3564463A
Cited
US3564463B1
Cited
US3760471A
Cited
US3573672A
Cited
US3864161A
Cited
US4028647A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1981-09-04 | 1982-03-06 | 1982-09-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1985-09-04 | 1986-03-06 | 1986-09-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1989-09-04 | 1990-03-06 | 1990-09-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |