Patent US4519391A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US3995270A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US3995270A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Constant false alarm rate (CFAR) circuitry for minimizing extraneous target sensitivity

Assignee: United States Department of the Navy
•
Filing: 1975-06-16
•
Granted: 1976-11-30
•
Expires: 1995-06-16
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract CFAR systems may become ineffective when extraneous targets present in thhold control cells raise the threshold detection level to such a point that the target in the cell being tested becomes obscured. The present circuitry locates the particular threshold control cell or cells having the extraneous target and eliminates it from the threshold detection level computation.

Inventors

  • 👤 Richard Prather Perry
  • 👤 Harry Urkowitz

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-23 16:40
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S7/00; G01S7/02; G01S7/28; G01S7/285; G01S7/292; G01S7/2923; G01S7/2927; G01S7/2921; G01S7/2922

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim 423 words
A signal processor for establishing an environment threshold level for determining the presence of a target-strength signal in an incoming series of signals, comprising: first, second and third signal-advancing delay line means each having a plurality of output taps forming each line into a plurality of spaced sequentially-arranged cells, all of said lines being adapted to receive a signal input in a first cell and advance said input from tap to tap at the same rate whereby said lines are formed of numerically-counterpart cells, said first delay line being receivably-coupled to said incoming signal series and at least one cell of said first and third lines being used as a `test` cell while the other cells of said two lines are `control` cells, signal-generating sampling means coupled to the output taps of said `test` and `control` cells of said first delay line for comparing the signal strength of the `test` cell against that of the `control` cells and generating as an output an `inhibit` signal when said `test` cell strength exceeds that of the `control` cells; said `test` and `control` cell samplings and comparisons being performed synchronously with the advance rate of said delay lines, said second delay line being coupled to the output of signal-generating sampling means and said third line to said `test` cell output of said first line whereby an `inhibit` signal derived from any one of said samplings is received by said first cell of said second line simultaneously with the reception of a relatively high target-like signal in the first cell of said third line, said rate of advance of said lines advancing said entered signals simultaneously through said numerical counterpart cells of both of said lines, coincidence gates coupling the outputs of the `control` cells of said third line with the outputs of said numerical counterparts of said second inhibit signal line, a third delay line averaging means coupled to said coincidence gates for providing as an output an average of said third line control cell outputs, and detection means coupled to the output of said averaging means and said third delay line `test` cell for comparing said outputs and determining when said `test` cell output exceeds said `control` cell average, said coincidence gates blocking passage of a third delay line `control` cell signal into said averaging means when an `inhibit` signal is present in its numerical counterpart second line cell, whereby said averaging means can provide a truer environmental average unaffected by extraneous relatively high signal strengths present in the `control` cells of said third line.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 423 words
A signal processor for establishing an environment threshold level for determining the presence of a target-strength signal in an incoming series of signals, comprising: first, second and third signal-advancing delay line means each having a plurality of output taps forming each line into a plurality of spaced sequentially-arranged cells, all of said lines being adapted to receive a signal input in a first cell and advance said input from tap to tap at the same rate whereby said lines are formed of numerically-counterpart cells, said first delay line being receivably-coupled to said incoming signal series and at least one cell of said first and third lines being used as a `test` cell while the other cells of said two lines are `control` cells, signal-generating sampling means coupled to the output taps of said `test` and `control` cells of said first delay line for comparing the signal strength of the `test` cell against that of the `control` cells and generating as an output an `inhibit` signal when said `test` cell strength exceeds that of the `control` cells; said `test` and `control` cell samplings and comparisons being performed synchronously with the advance rate of said delay lines, said second delay line being coupled to the output of signal-generating sampling means and said third line to said `test` cell output of said first line whereby an `inhibit` signal derived from any one of said samplings is received by said first cell of said second line simultaneously with the reception of a relatively high target-like signal in the first cell of said third line, said rate of advance of said lines advancing said entered signals simultaneously through said numerical counterpart cells of both of said lines, coincidence gates coupling the outputs of the `control` cells of said third line with the outputs of said numerical counterparts of said second inhibit signal line, a third delay line averaging means coupled to said coincidence gates for providing as an output an average of said third line control cell outputs, and detection means coupled to the output of said averaging means and said third delay line `test` cell for comparing said outputs and determining when said `test` cell output exceeds said `control` cell average, said coincidence gates blocking passage of a third delay line `control` cell signal into said averaging means when an `inhibit` signal is present in its numerical counterpart second line cell, whereby said averaging means can provide a truer environmental average unaffected by extraneous relatively high signal strengths present in the `control` cells of said third line.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 89 words
The processor of claim 1 wherein said signal-generating sampling means includes: a comparison summer coupled to said first line `test` cell, and a first delay line control cell averaging means receivably coupled to said first line `control` cells and provided with an output coupled to said comparison summer, said first line averaging means including: a control cell summer, and a multiplying means coupled to the control cell summer for multiplying its sum by a constant (K 1 ) to produce a threshold (T L ) for said comparison summer.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 35 words
The processor of claim 2 wherein said processor is adapted for a log/CFAR radar receiver, said processor including a logarithmic amplifier in the circuit coupling said first line `test` cell to said third delay line.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 51 words
The processor of claim 2 wherein said third line averaging means includes: a third line control cell summer coupled to said coincidence gates, and a multiplying means coupled to said third line summer for multiplying it sum by a constant (K) to produce said T D threshold for said detection means.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 17 words
The processor of claim 4 wherein said T L threshold is lower than said T D threshold.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 39 words
The processor of claim 5 wherein the value constant K 1 is related to the anticipated signal strength of noise and clutter interferences to the extent that only `test` cell signals strengths exceeding said interference produce said inhibit signals.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3487405A Cited
US3701149A Cited
US3778822A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1979-11-30 1980-05-31 1980-11-30 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1983-11-30 1984-05-31 1984-11-30 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1987-11-30 1988-05-31 1988-11-30 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag