US8050463B2
Active / In Force
US
⏱️ 0.3 years remaining
Iris recognition system having image quality metrics
Assignee: Gentex Corp
•
Filing: 2007-03-02
•
Granted: 2011-11-01
•
Expires: 2027-03-02
Abstract
Abstract An iris recognition system implementing image quality metrics to assess the quality of an acquired eye image for reliable operation. Images with low image quality may be rejected or flagged based upon the application. The image quality may be determined with a preprocessing module in the recognition system. The processing may be configured based on a quality assessment.
Inventors
- 👤 Rida M. Hamza
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 04:36
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06V; G06V40/00; G06V40/10; G06V40/18; G06V40/193; G06V10/00; G06V10/70; G06V10/74; G06V10/75; G06V10/98; G06V10/993
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 28
Claim 1
Independent Claim
87 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; and a data-processing apparatus; a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; wherein the quality assessment of the iris image includes an assessment of image blur; and image blur is measured according to high frequency distortions from coarse to fine wavelet coefficients.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
87 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; and a data-processing apparatus; a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; wherein the quality assessment of the iris image includes an assessment of image blur; and image blur is measured according to high frequency distortions from coarse to fine wavelet coefficients.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
38 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein the quality assessment of an iris image further includes an analysis of one or more of the following image conditions which comprise: defocus; closure; obscuration; off-angle detection; reflection; and/or excessive dilation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
54 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein a quality assessment of the iris image includes an analysis of the iris image relative to iris obscuration including a computation of an integral of virtually total area between an eyelid curve and an iris inner boundary of an eye from which the iris image is taken.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
39 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein a quality assessment of the iris image includes an analysis based on an XOR-ing of codes of two patches of the iris image to measure a discrepancy among bits of the patches.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
47 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein a quality assessment of the iris image includes an analysis based on measuring similarity of two patches of the iris image using contrast similarity, intensity distribution similarity, peak signal to noise ratio, and/or correlation between intensities of the two patches.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
42 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein a quality assessment of the iris image includes an analysis of the iris image relative to an amount of reflection by the iris in the image including an iris curve fitting and a contrast thresholding.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
168 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; and a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; wherein a quality measurement relative to blur and/or defocus of the iris image is based on a measurement of energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image; wherein the measurement of energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image is compared to a measurement of energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image without blur and/or defocus; and an amount that the energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image is less than the energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image without blur and/or defocus is proportional to the blur and/or defocus of the image.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
168 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; and a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; wherein a quality measurement relative to blur and/or defocus of the iris image is based on a measurement of energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image; wherein the measurement of energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image is compared to a measurement of energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image without blur and/or defocus; and an amount that the energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image is less than the energy at high frequencies of the spectral domain of the image without blur and/or defocus is proportional to the blur and/or defocus of the image.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
121 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; and a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; wherein the quality assessment of the iris image is according to blur; blur is measured according to high frequency distortions from coarse to fine wavelet coefficients; and wherein the high frequency distortions among the coarse to fine wavelet coefficients are indicated by a comparison of linear frequency distortion filter outputs at multiple stages of a dyadic decomposition to measure a discrepancy among the stages.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
121 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; and a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; wherein the quality assessment of the iris image is according to blur; blur is measured according to high frequency distortions from coarse to fine wavelet coefficients; and wherein the high frequency distortions among the coarse to fine wavelet coefficients are indicated by a comparison of linear frequency distortion filter outputs at multiple stages of a dyadic decomposition to measure a discrepancy among the stages.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
103 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; and a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; wherein the quality assessment of the iris image is according to blur; blur is measured according to high frequency distortions from coarse to fine wavelet coefficients; and wherein high frequency content is compared at wavelet decompositions between two patches of the iris image for similarity purposes.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
103 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; and a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; wherein the quality assessment of the iris image is according to blur; blur is measured according to high frequency distortions from coarse to fine wavelet coefficients; and wherein high frequency content is compared at wavelet decompositions between two patches of the iris image for similarity purposes.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
39 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein a quality assessment of the iris image includes an analysis of the iris image relative to eye closure including an analysis of an inner border profile of the iris in the image.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
47 words
The system of claim 10 , wherein the inner border profile is estimated according to a measurement of an amount that a detected curve of the profile is similar to an elliptic-like shape, and a measurement of an amount of exposure of a map of the iris.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
92 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; and a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; and wherein a quality assessment of the iris image is according to a comparison of a location of edges of the pupil with a set of defined limits for normal operation of a pupil dilation.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
92 words
A computer implemented iris image quality metric system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; and a quality processing module connected to the device; wherein the quality processing module is executed by the data-processing apparatus, the module and data-processing apparatus are operated in combination to provide a quality assessment of an iris image; and wherein a quality assessment of the iris image is according to a comparison of a location of edges of the pupil with a set of defined limits for normal operation of a pupil dilation.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
134 words
A computer implemented iris image preprocessing system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; an iris image module executed by the data-processing apparatus; an iris image quality measurement module executed by the data-processing apparatus and connected to the iris image module; an evaluator connected to the iris image module; a rehabilitator connected to the evaluator; wherein: the evaluator receives a quality measurement of an iris image from the quality measurement module, indicates whether the iris image is acceptable or unacceptable for further processing, and indicates whether an iris image that is unacceptable should be rejected or be rehabilitated for further processing; and the rehabilitator conditions the image by one or more of pixel processing, contrast balancing, histogram equalization, image blind deblurring, adaptive filtering for iris texture restoration, and pose normalization.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
134 words
A computer implemented iris image preprocessing system comprising: a device for acquiring an iris image; a data-processing apparatus; an iris image module executed by the data-processing apparatus; an iris image quality measurement module executed by the data-processing apparatus and connected to the iris image module; an evaluator connected to the iris image module; a rehabilitator connected to the evaluator; wherein: the evaluator receives a quality measurement of an iris image from the quality measurement module, indicates whether the iris image is acceptable or unacceptable for further processing, and indicates whether an iris image that is unacceptable should be rejected or be rehabilitated for further processing; and the rehabilitator conditions the image by one or more of pixel processing, contrast balancing, histogram equalization, image blind deblurring, adaptive filtering for iris texture restoration, and pose normalization.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
31 words
The system of claim 13 , further comprising an image segmentation module connected to the iris image module, the image segmentation module performing one dimensional polar segmentation on the iris image.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
120 words
A computer implemented method for assessing quality of an image comprising: receiving an iris image from an iris image acquiring device; measuring at least one quality of the iris image using a data-processing apparatus including a quality processing module; evaluating the at least one quality to determine whether the iris image is adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing; determining whether an iris image, which is not adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing, is adequate for rehabilitation; if the iris image is adequate for rehabilitation, conditioning the image by one or more of pixel processing, contrast balancing, histogram equalization, image blind deblurring, adaptive filtering for iris texture restoration, and pose normalization.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
120 words
A computer implemented method for assessing quality of an image comprising: receiving an iris image from an iris image acquiring device; measuring at least one quality of the iris image using a data-processing apparatus including a quality processing module; evaluating the at least one quality to determine whether the iris image is adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing; determining whether an iris image, which is not adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing, is adequate for rehabilitation; if the iris image is adequate for rehabilitation, conditioning the image by one or more of pixel processing, contrast balancing, histogram equalization, image blind deblurring, adaptive filtering for iris texture restoration, and pose normalization.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
131 words
A computer implemented method for assessing quality of an image comprising: receiving an iris image from an iris image acquiring device; measuring at least one quality of the iris image using a data-processing apparatus including a quality processing module; evaluating the at least one quality to determine whether the iris image is adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing; measuring a first energy, at high frequencies, of the spectral domain of the iris image; determining a second energy, at high frequencies, of the spectral domain of a model iris image which is adequate for further processing; and wherein if the first energy is within a set percentage of the second energy, then the iris image is adequate, relative to the at least one quality, for further processing.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
131 words
A computer implemented method for assessing quality of an image comprising: receiving an iris image from an iris image acquiring device; measuring at least one quality of the iris image using a data-processing apparatus including a quality processing module; evaluating the at least one quality to determine whether the iris image is adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing; measuring a first energy, at high frequencies, of the spectral domain of the iris image; determining a second energy, at high frequencies, of the spectral domain of a model iris image which is adequate for further processing; and wherein if the first energy is within a set percentage of the second energy, then the iris image is adequate, relative to the at least one quality, for further processing.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
133 words
A computer implemented method for assessing quality of an image comprising: receiving an iris image from an iris image acquiring device; measuring at least one quality of the iris image using a data-processing apparatus including a quality processing module; evaluating the at least one quality to determine whether the iris image is adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing; obtaining two different localized patches from an iris code of the iris image; XOR-ing the two patches; measuring an amount of discrepancy among cross-matched bits of the two patches; determining whether the amount of discrepancy is greater than a set amount; and wherein if the amount of discrepancy is greater than a set amount, then the iris image is adequate, relative to the at least one quality, for further processing.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
133 words
A computer implemented method for assessing quality of an image comprising: receiving an iris image from an iris image acquiring device; measuring at least one quality of the iris image using a data-processing apparatus including a quality processing module; evaluating the at least one quality to determine whether the iris image is adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing; obtaining two different localized patches from an iris code of the iris image; XOR-ing the two patches; measuring an amount of discrepancy among cross-matched bits of the two patches; determining whether the amount of discrepancy is greater than a set amount; and wherein if the amount of discrepancy is greater than a set amount, then the iris image is adequate, relative to the at least one quality, for further processing.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
179 words
A computer implemented method for assessing quality of an image comprising: receiving an iris image from an iris image acquiring device; measuring at least one quality of the iris image using a data-processing apparatus including a quality processing module; evaluating the at least one quality to determine whether the iris image is adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing; measuring an amount of difference between the inner border profile in the iris image and an elliptic-like shape; and measuring a percentage of the iris map of the iris image that is exposed; and wherein: if the amount of difference is less than a set difference for an iris image adequate for further processing relative to the at least one quality, then the image is adequate for further processing relative to the at least one quality; and if the percentage is greater than a set percentage for an iris image adequate for further processing relative to the at least one quality, then the image is adequate for further processing relative to the at least one quality.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
179 words
A computer implemented method for assessing quality of an image comprising: receiving an iris image from an iris image acquiring device; measuring at least one quality of the iris image using a data-processing apparatus including a quality processing module; evaluating the at least one quality to determine whether the iris image is adequate relative to the at least one quality for further processing; measuring an amount of difference between the inner border profile in the iris image and an elliptic-like shape; and measuring a percentage of the iris map of the iris image that is exposed; and wherein: if the amount of difference is less than a set difference for an iris image adequate for further processing relative to the at least one quality, then the image is adequate for further processing relative to the at least one quality; and if the percentage is greater than a set percentage for an iris image adequate for further processing relative to the at least one quality, then the image is adequate for further processing relative to the at least one quality.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4641349A
Cited
US4836670A
Cited
US6091899A
Cited
US5231674A
Cited
EP0484076B1
Cited
US5359382A
Cited
US5293427A
Cited
US5664239A
Cited
US5291560A
Cited
US20020089157A1
Cited
US5896174A
Cited
EP0593386A3
Cited
US5608472A
Cited
US5551027A
Cited
US5404013A
Cited
US6325765B1
Cited
US6104431A
Cited
US5751836A
Cited
US5572596A
Cited
EP1126403A2
Cited
US6714665B1
Cited
US5860032A
Cited
US6012376A
Cited
US6493363B1
Cited
US5901238A
Cited
US7197173B2
Cited
US6503163B1
Cited
US6400835B1
Cited
US6005704A
Cited
US5717512A
Cited
US6718665B2
Cited
US6309069B1
Cited
US6081607A
Cited
US6837436B2
Cited
US6108636A
Cited
US5909269A
Cited
US6320973B2
Cited
US6144754A
Cited
US6285780B1
Cited
EP0878780A3
Cited
US5859686A
Cited
US6516416B2
Cited
US6119096A
Cited
US6246751B1
Cited
US7071971B2
Cited
EP0899680B1
Cited
US6007202A
Cited
US20020164054A1
Cited
EP0910986A1
Cited
US6064752A
Cited
US6069967A
Cited
US6252977B1
Cited
US6055322A
Cited
US6021210A
Cited
US5953440A
Cited
US6028949A
Cited
US6285505B1
Cited
US6101477A
Cited
US6088470A
Cited
US5978494A
Cited
US6546121B1
Cited
US6508397B1
Cited
US6320612B1
Cited
US6957341B2
Cited
US6594399B1
Cited
EP0962894A3
Cited
JP2000011163A
Cited
JP2000005150A
Cited
JP2000005149A
Cited
US6424845B1
Cited
US5956122A
Cited
US6766041B2
Cited
JP2000023946A
Cited
US6526160B1
Cited
US6542624B1
Cited
JP2000083930A
Cited
US6751733B1
Cited
US6134339A
Cited
US20010047479A1
Cited
JP2000102510A
Cited
JP2000102524A
Cited
JP2000105830A
Cited
US6330674B1
Cited
US6522772B1
Cited
JP2000107156A
Cited
US6591001B1
Cited
US6580356B1
Cited
US6433818B1
Cited
US7537568B2
Cited
US6484936B1
Cited
JP2000139878A
Cited
JP2000155863A
Cited
US6289113B1
Cited
US6753919B1
Cited
US6532298B1
Cited
US6424727B1
Cited
US6377699B1
Cited
US6483930B1
Cited
JP2000182050A
Cited
JP2000185031A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2014-10-31 | 2015-05-02 | 2015-11-01 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2018-10-31 | 2019-05-02 | 2019-11-01 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2022-10-31 | 2023-05-02 | 2023-11-01 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |