Radio access technology selection

Claim 3

The method of claim 1 , where the predicting further comprises: predicting the application to be used based on one or more of past user history behavior, location information, or time of day.

Claim 4

The method of claim 1 , where the determining of the preferred RAT is based on one or more of a monetary cost criteria, a power consumption criteria associated with the wireless communications device, a bandwidth criteria, or an application availability criteria.

Claim 5

The method of claim 3 , where the monetary cost criteria includes at least one of minimizing roaming fees or minimizing a cost associated with utilizing a service with respect to the predicted application.

Claim 6

The method of claim 1 , where the ensuring is performed, and where the ensuring comprises: preventing reselection of a RAT or handover to a different RAT based on an offset of a reselection threshold or an offset of a handover threshold.

Claim 7

The method of claim 1 , where the searching is performed, and where the searching comprises: receiving a neighboring cell list from a network; and searching for the determined RAT based on the neighboring cell list.

Claim 8

The method of claim 1 , where the searching is performed, and where the searching comprises: searching based on a history list of previously used or detected RATs and carrier frequencies, or searching based on a history list of previously used or detected RATs based on current position data of the wireless communications device.

Claim 9

The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving a selection of an application; and determining whether the current RAT supports the selected application.

Claim 10

The method of claim 8 , further comprising: starting the selected application when it is determined that the current RAT supports the selected application; determining whether the wireless communications device is utilizing the determined preferred RAT; performing a search for the determined preferred RAT when the current RAT does not correspond to the determined preferred RAT; performing a handover to the determined preferred RAT if the determined preferred RAT is found based on the search; and when the determined preferred RAT is found the ensuring comprises: preventing reselection of a RAT or handover to a different RAT based on an offset of a reselection threshold or an offset of a handover threshold, where the offset of the reselection threshold or the offset of the handover threshold is maintained until the selected application is terminated.

Claim 11

The method of claim 8 , further comprising: delaying a starting of the selected application when it is determined that the current RAT does not support the selected application; performing a search, for a period of time, to find the determined preferred RAT that supports the selected application; and indicating an application start-up failure when the period of time expires without finding the determined preferred RAT that supports the selected application.

Claim 12

A wireless communications device comprising: at least one processor configured to: predict an application expected to be used based on a user's interaction with the wireless communications device, where the at least one processor, when predicting the application expected to be used, is further to: determine a current status of a user interface of the wireless communications device based on the user interaction, and predict the application expected to be used based on the determined current status of the user interface, determine a preferred radio access technology (RAT) based on the predicted application, determine whether a current RAT being utilized by the wireless communications device corresponds to the determined preferred RAT, and perform one of: ensure that the wireless communications device continues to utilize the current RAT when the determined preferred RAT corresponds to the current RAT, or search for the determined preferred RAT when the current RAT does not correspond to the determined preferred RAT, and select the determined preferred RAT, based on the searching, when the determined preferred RAT is found.

Claim 13

A wireless communications device comprising: at least one processor configured to: predict an application expected to be used based on a user's interaction with the wireless communications device, where the at least one processor, when predicting the application expected to be used, is further to: determine a current status of a user interface of the wireless communications device based on the user interaction, and predict the application expected to be used based on the determined current status of the user interface, determine a preferred radio access technology (RAT) based on the predicted application, determine whether a current RAT being utilized by the wireless communications device corresponds to the determined preferred RAT, and perform one of: ensure that the wireless communications device continues to utilize the current RAT when the determined preferred RAT corresponds to the current RAT, or search for the determined preferred RAT when the current RAT does not correspond to the determined preferred RAT, and select the determined preferred RAT, based on the searching, when the determined preferred RAT is found.

Claim 14

The wireless communications device of claim 11 , where, when determining the preferred RAT, the at least one processor is further configured to: determine the preferred RAT based on one or more of a monetary cost criteria, power consumption associated with the wireless communications device criteria, bandwidth criteria, or an application availability criteria.

Claim 15

The wireless communications device of claim 12 , where the application availability criteria indicates whether a particular RAT supports the predicted application.

Claim 16

The wireless communications device of claim 11 , where, when ensuring that the wireless communication device continues to utilize the current RAT, the at least one processor is further configured to: prevent reselection of a different RAT or handover to a different RAT by offsetting one or more threshold values that govern reselection or handover with respect to the current RAT.

Claim 17

The wireless communications device of claim 11 , where the at least one processor is further configured to: receive a user selection of an application, determine whether the current RAT supports the user selected application.

Claim 18

The wireless communications device of claim 15 , where the at least one processor is further configured to: start the selected application when it is determined that the current RAT supports the selected application; determine whether the wireless communications device is utilizing the determined preferred RAT; perform a search for the determined RAT when the current RAT does not correspond to the determined preferred RAT; and perform a handover to the determined preferred RAT if the determined preferred RAT is found based on the search.

Claim 19

The wireless communications device of claim 15 , where the at least one processor is further configured to: delay a starting of the selected application when it is determined that the current RAT does not support the selected application; perform a search, for a period of time, to find the determined preferred RAT that supports the selected application; and indicate an application start-up failure when the period of time expires without finding the determined preferred RAT that supports the selected application.

Claim 20

The wireless communications device of claim 11 , where, when the determining the preferred RAT, the at least one processor is further configured to: consult a database that identifies one or more preferred RATs that support the predicted application, where the one or more RATs are prioritized based on one or more of a monetary cost criteria, a power consumption criteria associated with the wireless communications device, a bandwidth criteria, or an application availability criteria.

Claim 21

A computer-readable medium containing instructions executable by at least one processor of a wireless communications device, the computer-readable medium comprising: one or more instructions for predicting an application that will be started based on a user's interaction with the wireless communications device, where the one or more instructions for predicting the application further include: one or more instructions to determine a current status of a user interface of the wireless communications device based on the user interaction, and one or more instructions to predict the application based on the determined current status of the user interface; one or more instructions for determining a preferred radio access technology (RAT) based on the predicted application; one or more instructions for determining whether a current RAT being utilized by the wireless communications device corresponds to the preferred RAT; one or more instructions for ensuring that the wireless communications device continues to utilize the current RAT when the preferred RAT corresponds to the current RAT; and one or more instructions for searching for the preferred RAT when the current RAT does not correspond to the preferred RAT.

Claim 22

A computer-readable medium containing instructions executable by at least one processor of a wireless communications device, the computer-readable medium comprising: one or more instructions for predicting an application that will be started based on a user's interaction with the wireless communications device, where the one or more instructions for predicting the application further include: one or more instructions to determine a current status of a user interface of the wireless communications device based on the user interaction, and one or more instructions to predict the application based on the determined current status of the user interface; one or more instructions for determining a preferred radio access technology (RAT) based on the predicted application; one or more instructions for determining whether a current RAT being utilized by the wireless communications device corresponds to the preferred RAT; one or more instructions for ensuring that the wireless communications device continues to utilize the current RAT when the preferred RAT corresponds to the current RAT; and one or more instructions for searching for the preferred RAT when the current RAT does not correspond to the preferred RAT.

Claim 23

The computer-readable medium of claim 19 , where the determining the preferred RAT is based on one or more of a monetary cost criteria, a power consumption criteria associated with the wireless communications device, a bandwidth criteria, or an application availability criteria.