Patent US3614432A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US1978290A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US2005231A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US7363094B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US7363094B2
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Multivariable controller design method for multiple input/outputs systems with multiple input/output constraints
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 2006-01-09
•
Granted: 2008-04-22
•
Expires: 2026-01-09
Abstract
Abstract A method for dynamically controlling a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) system having multiple input and output constraints, the method comprising. In an exemplary embodiment, the method includes configuring a MIMO tracking controller to implement closed loop tracking of multiple control reference inputs of the system, in the absence of input and output constraints, and configuring a MIMO constraint controller to enforce the input and output constraints of the MIMO system by generating a reference modification applied to the multiple control reference inputs.
Inventors
- 👤 Aditya Kumar
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 21:37
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B11/00; G05B11/01; G05B11/32
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
129 words
A method for dynamically controlling a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) system having multiple input and output constraints, the method comprising: a two-step sequential process comprising: a first step configuring a MIMO tracking controller to implement closed loop tracking of multiple control reference inputs of the system via an inner control loop, in the absence of input and output constraints; and a second step of configuring a MIMO constraint controller via an outer control loop to enforce the input and output constraints of the MIMO system via an explicit analytical formula by generating a reference modification applied to said multiple control reference inputs such that said input and output constraints are dynamically controlled and the reference modification in the MIMO constraint controller is calculated via the explicit analytical formula.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
129 words
A method for dynamically controlling a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) system having multiple input and output constraints, the method comprising: a two-step sequential process comprising: a first step configuring a MIMO tracking controller to implement closed loop tracking of multiple control reference inputs of the system via an inner control loop, in the absence of input and output constraints; and a second step of configuring a MIMO constraint controller via an outer control loop to enforce the input and output constraints of the MIMO system via an explicit analytical formula by generating a reference modification applied to said multiple control reference inputs such that said input and output constraints are dynamically controlled and the reference modification in the MIMO constraint controller is calculated via the explicit analytical formula.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
116 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said configuring said MIMO constraint controller further comprises: determining a discrete, linearized model of a resulting closed loop portion of the MIMO system including said MIMO tracking controller for a current time sample; predicting, using said linearized model, constraint input and output values at a desired future time with respect to said current sample time, and comparing the predicted values to respective minimum and maximum values of the input and output constraints so as to determine whether any of said input and output constraints are active; and based on the determination of any active input and output constraints, calculating said reference modification using a robust dynamic inversion (DI) technique.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 2 , wherein said closed loop portion of the MIMO system includes integral action that is not bounded by said input constraints.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 2 , wherein said robust DI technique utilizes weighted least squares to generate a weighted pseudo-inverse matrix so as to provide stability for non-square system conditions.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 4 , wherein said robust DI technique further comprises: determining a first positive definite weighting matrix, R, for prioritizing tracking performance of multiple control outputs of the system; and determining a second positive definite weighting matrix, Q, for prioritizing enforcement of said constraint outputs.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 5 , wherein said weighted pseudo-inverse matrix is of the form: [(C c B) T Q(C c B)+R] −1 (C c B) T Q, wherein C c B represents the decoupling matrix for the MIMO system.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein said MIMO constraint controller is configured to calculate a change in actuator control input rates to be applied to corresponding base values outputted by said MIMO tracking controller.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
125 words
A control architecture for a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) system having multiple input and output constraints, comprising: a MIMO tracking controller configured to implement a first sequential step of closed loop tracking of multiple control reference inputs of the system via an inner control loop, in the absence of input and output constraints; and a MIMO constraint controller configured to implement via an outer control loop a second sequential step of enforcing the input and output constraints of the MIMO system via an explicit analytical formula by generating a reference modification applied to said multiple control reference inputs such that said input and output constraints are dynamically controlled and the reference modification in the MIMO constraint controller is calculated via the explicit analytical formula.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
125 words
A control architecture for a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) system having multiple input and output constraints, comprising: a MIMO tracking controller configured to implement a first sequential step of closed loop tracking of multiple control reference inputs of the system via an inner control loop, in the absence of input and output constraints; and a MIMO constraint controller configured to implement via an outer control loop a second sequential step of enforcing the input and output constraints of the MIMO system via an explicit analytical formula by generating a reference modification applied to said multiple control reference inputs such that said input and output constraints are dynamically controlled and the reference modification in the MIMO constraint controller is calculated via the explicit analytical formula.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
116 words
The control architecture of claim 8 , wherein said MIMO constraint controller is configured to: utilize a discrete, linearized model of a resulting closed loop portion of the MIMO system including said MIMO tracking controller for a current time sample; predict, using said linearized model, constraint input and output values at a desired future time with respect to said current sample time, and compare the predicted values to respective minimum and maximum values of the input and output constraints so as to determine whether any of said input and output constraints are active; and based on the determination of any active input and output constraints, calculate said reference modification using a robust dynamic inversion (DI) technique.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
27 words
The control architecture of claim 9 , wherein said closed loop portion of the MIMO system includes integral action that is not bounded by said input constraints.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
31 words
The control architecture of claim 9 , wherein said robust DI technique utilizes weighted least squares to generate a weighted pseudo-inverse matrix so as to provide stability for non-square system conditions.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
49 words
The control architecture of claim 11 , wherein said robust DI technique further comprises: determining a first positive definite weighting matrix, R, for prioritizing tracking performance of multiple control outputs of the system; and determining a second positive definite weighting matrix, Q, for prioritizing enforcement of said constraint outputs.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
41 words
The control architecture of claim 12 , wherein said weighted pseudo-inverse matrix is of the form: [(C c B) T Q(C c B)+R] −1 (C c B) T Q, wherein C c B represents the decoupling matrix for the MIMO system.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
36 words
The control architecture of claim 8 , wherein said MIMO constraint controller is configured to calculate a change in actuator control input rates to be applied to corresponding base values outputted by said MIMO tracking controller.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
146 words
A storage medium, comprising: a machine readable computer program code for dynamically controlling a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) system having multiple input and output constraints; and instructions for causing a computer to implement a two-step sequential method, the method further comprising: a first step of configuring a MIMO tracking controller via an inner control loop to implement closed loop tracking of multiple control reference inputs of the system, in the absence of input and output constraints; and a second step of configuring a MIMO constraint controller via an outer control loop to enforce the input and output constraints of to MIMO system via an explicit analytical formula by generating a reference modification applied to said multiple control reference inputs such that said input and output constraints are dynamically controlled and the reference modification in the MIMO constraint controller is calculated via the explicit analytical formula.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
146 words
A storage medium, comprising: a machine readable computer program code for dynamically controlling a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) system having multiple input and output constraints; and instructions for causing a computer to implement a two-step sequential method, the method further comprising: a first step of configuring a MIMO tracking controller via an inner control loop to implement closed loop tracking of multiple control reference inputs of the system, in the absence of input and output constraints; and a second step of configuring a MIMO constraint controller via an outer control loop to enforce the input and output constraints of to MIMO system via an explicit analytical formula by generating a reference modification applied to said multiple control reference inputs such that said input and output constraints are dynamically controlled and the reference modification in the MIMO constraint controller is calculated via the explicit analytical formula.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
116 words
The method of claim 15 , wherein said configuring said MIMO constraint controller further comprises: determining a discrete, linearized model of a resulting closed loop portion of the MIMO system including said MIMO tracking controller for a current time sample; predicting, using said linearized model, constraint input and output values at a desired future time with respect to said current sample time, and comparing the predicted values to respective minimum and maximum values of the input and output constraints so as to determine whether any of said input and output constraints are active; and based on the determination of any active input and output constraints, calculating said reference modification using a robust dynamic inversion (DI) technique.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 16 , wherein said closed loop portion of the MIMO system includes integral action that is not bounded by said input constraints.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 16 , wherein said robust DI technique utilizes weighted least squares to generate a weighted pseudo-inverse matrix so as to provide stability for non-square system conditions.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 18 , wherein said robust DI technique further comprises: determining a first positive definite weighting matrix, R, for prioritizing tracking performance of multiple control outputs of the system; and determining a second positive definite weighting matrix, Q, for prioritizing enforcement of said constraint outputs.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 19 , wherein said weighted pseudo-inverse matrix is of the form: [(C c B) T Q(C c B)+R] −1 (C c B) T Q, wherein C c B represents the decoupling matrix for the MIMO system.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 15 , wherein said MIMO constraint controller is configured to calculate a change in actuator rates to be applied to corresponding base values outputted by said MIMO tracking controller.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5446648A
Cited
US5384698A
Cited
US5486996A
Cited
US5456870A
Cited
US5519605A
Cited
US5796606A
Cited
US5893055A
Cited
US5920478A
Cited
US6565729B2
Cited
US6631299B1
Cited
US6587744B1
Cited
US6721608B1
Cited
US7123973B2
Cited
US6684115B1
Cited
US6684112B1
Cited
US7016743B1
Cited
US7158840B2
Cited
US7117045B2
Cited
US6917840B2
Cited
US6823675B2
Cited
US6823253B2
Cited
US6882889B2
Cited
US20040107013A1
Cited
US6865441B2
Cited
US6937908B2
Cited
EP1447727A2
Cited
US7035694B2
Cited
EP1538319A1
Cited
US7050880B2
Cited
US20050193739A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2011-04-22 | 2011-10-22 | 2012-04-22 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2015-04-22 | 2015-10-22 | 2016-04-22 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2019-04-22 | 2019-10-22 | 2020-04-22 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |