Patent US7130865B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US7130865B2 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Methods and systems for developing market intelligence

Assignee: Western Union Co
•
Filing: 2001-12-19
•
Granted: 2006-10-31
•
Expires: 2021-12-19
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Methods and systems are provided for characterizing market distribution for a business having multiple business representatives. The business is considered to be in competition with one or more competitors, each of which also has multiple representatives. Locations are determined both for the business representatives and for the competitor representatives, and these locations are used to populate one or more databases. A locator identification is assigned to each distinct location and used as a pointer within the databases. The locator identification may be unique to specific street addresses, permitting improved analysis of the market information, particularly analysis derived from the geographical distributions of the business representatives and of the competitor representatives.

Inventors

  • 👤 Raymond Moore

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-26 17:45
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q30/00; G06Q30/02; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/06; G06Q10/063; G06Q10/0637; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S707/00; Y10S707/99931; Y10S707/99941; Y10S707/99944; Y10S707/99945; Y10S707/99948

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 32
Claim 1
Independent Claim 195 words
A method for characterizing market distribution of a business, the method comprising: determining a location of each of a plurality of business representatives comprised by the business and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of the business's products; determining a location of each of a plurality of competitor representatives comprised by one or more competitors and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of competitor products, wherein each of the one or more competitors competes for sales of products with the business; populating at least one database with the locations of the business representatives and the locations of the competitor representatives; from location information in the at least one populated database, calculating a probability that quantifies a level of competition to the business for sales of the business's products, the competition being provided by the one or more competitors providing sales of the competitor products, and the level of competition being quantified in terms of a distance measure between the business and competitor representatives; correlating the quantified level of competition with demographic data corresponding to the location information in the at least one populated database; and outputting the quantified level of competition.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 195 words
A method for characterizing market distribution of a business, the method comprising: determining a location of each of a plurality of business representatives comprised by the business and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of the business's products; determining a location of each of a plurality of competitor representatives comprised by one or more competitors and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of competitor products, wherein each of the one or more competitors competes for sales of products with the business; populating at least one database with the locations of the business representatives and the locations of the competitor representatives; from location information in the at least one populated database, calculating a probability that quantifies a level of competition to the business for sales of the business's products, the competition being provided by the one or more competitors providing sales of the competitor products, and the level of competition being quantified in terms of a distance measure between the business and competitor representatives; correlating the quantified level of competition with demographic data corresponding to the location information in the at least one populated database; and outputting the quantified level of competition.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein determining the location of each of the plurality of competitor representatives comprises accessing an representative locator service on an internet web site of the one or more competitors.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method recited in claim 2 wherein accessing the representative-locator service is performed automatically by a web robot.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein determining the location for each of the plurality of competitor representatives comprises accessing an authenticated source identifying transactions performed by the competitor representatives.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 16 words
The method recited in claim 4 wherein the authenticated source comprises a publicly available government record.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method recited in claim 1 wherein the demographic data comprise census data.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method recited in claim 1 further comprising applying a filter criterion to the correlated data to characterize geographic divisions within the demographic data by market penetration.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method recited in claim 7 further comprising displaying the locations graphically according to the geographic divisions, wherein the geographic divisions are distinctly displayed according to the filter criterion.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method recited in claim 1 further comprising displaying the locations graphically.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method recited in claim 9 wherein displaying the locations graphically comprises displaying the locations on a map.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 40 words
The method recited in claim 9 , wherein the at least one database includes product information of the business representatives and of the competitor representatives, the method further comprising displaying the product information of at least one of the locations.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method recited in claim 1 , wherein calculating the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprises calculating a probability that at least one of the competitor representatives exists within a predetermined distance of each business representative.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method recited in claim 1 , wherein calculating the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprises calculating a probability that at least one of the business representatives exists within a predetermined distance of each competitor representative.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method recited in claim 1 , wherein calculating the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprises calculating a probability that any of the competitor representatives exists within a predetermined distance of any of the business representatives.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 233 words
A computer system comprising: a communications system; a storage device; a processor in communication with the communications system and the storage device; and a memory coupled with the processor, the memory comprising a computer readable storage medium having a computer-readable program embodied therein to operate the computer system to characterize market distribution of a business, the computer-readable program including: instructions to maintain at least one database on the storage device to store a location of each of a plurality of business representatives comprised by the business and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of the business's products, and to store a location of each of a plurality of competitor representatives comprised by one or more competitors and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of competitor products, wherein each of the one or more competitors competes for sales of products with the business; instructions to calculate, from location information in the at least one database, a probability that quantifies a level of competition to the business for sales of the business's products, the competition being provided by the one or more competitors providing sales of the competitor products, and the level of competition being quantified in terms of a distance measure between the business and competitor representatives; and instructions to correlate the quantified level of competition with demographic data corresponding to the location information in the at least one database.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 233 words
A computer system comprising: a communications system; a storage device; a processor in communication with the communications system and the storage device; and a memory coupled with the processor, the memory comprising a computer readable storage medium having a computer-readable program embodied therein to operate the computer system to characterize market distribution of a business, the computer-readable program including: instructions to maintain at least one database on the storage device to store a location of each of a plurality of business representatives comprised by the business and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of the business's products, and to store a location of each of a plurality of competitor representatives comprised by one or more competitors and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of competitor products, wherein each of the one or more competitors competes for sales of products with the business; instructions to calculate, from location information in the at least one database, a probability that quantifies a level of competition to the business for sales of the business's products, the competition being provided by the one or more competitors providing sales of the competitor products, and the level of competition being quantified in terms of a distance measure between the business and competitor representatives; and instructions to correlate the quantified level of competition with demographic data corresponding to the location information in the at least one database.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 47 words
The computer system recited in claim 15 wherein the computer readable program further includes instructions to determine the location of each of the plurality of competitor representatives by accessing an representative-locator service with the communications system on an internet web site of the one or more competitors.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 38 words
The computer system recited in claim 15 wherein the computer-readable program further includes instructions to operate the processor to apply a filter criterion to the correlated data to characterize geographic divisions within the demographic data by market penetration.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 88 words
The computer system recited in claim 15 wherein the memory further comprises a second computer-readable storage medium having a second computer readable program embodied therein to operate the computer system to populate the at least one database, the second computer-readable program including: instructions to access a representative-locator service maintained by the one or more competitors at an internet web site; instructions to extract location information for the plurality of competitor representatives from the representative-locator service; and instructions to store the location information in the at least one database.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 43 words
The computer system recited in claim 15 , wherein instructions to calculate the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprise instructions to calculate a probability that at least one of the competitor representatives exists within a predetermined distance of each business representative.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 44 words
The computer system recited in claim 15 , wherein the instructions to calculate the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprise instructions to calculate a probability that at least one of the business representatives exists within a predetermined distance of each competitor representative.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 44 words
The computer system recited in claim 15 , wherein the instructions to calculate the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprise instructions to calculate a probability that any of the competitor representatives exists within a predetermined distance of any of the business representatives.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 231 words
A computer-readable storage medium having a computer-readable program embodied therein to direct operation of a computer system including a communications system, a processor, and a storage device, wherein the computer readable program includes instructions to operate the computer system to characterize market distribution of a business in accordance with the following: maintaining at least one database on the storage device to store a location of each of a plurality of business representatives comprised by the business and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of the business's products, and to store a location of each of a plurality of competitor representatives comprised by one or more competitors and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of competitor products, wherein each of the one or more competitors competes for sales of products with the business; from location information in the at least one database, calculating a probability with the processor that quantifies a level of competition to the business for sales of the business's products, the competition being provided by the one or more competitors providing sales of the competitor products, and the level of competition being quantified in terms of a distance measure between the business and competitor representatives; correlating, with the processor, the quantified level of competition with demographic data corresponding to the location information in the at least one database; and outputting the quantified level of competition.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 231 words
A computer-readable storage medium having a computer-readable program embodied therein to direct operation of a computer system including a communications system, a processor, and a storage device, wherein the computer readable program includes instructions to operate the computer system to characterize market distribution of a business in accordance with the following: maintaining at least one database on the storage device to store a location of each of a plurality of business representatives comprised by the business and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of the business's products, and to store a location of each of a plurality of competitor representatives comprised by one or more competitors and situated at different geographical locations to provide sales of competitor products, wherein each of the one or more competitors competes for sales of products with the business; from location information in the at least one database, calculating a probability with the processor that quantifies a level of competition to the business for sales of the business's products, the competition being provided by the one or more competitors providing sales of the competitor products, and the level of competition being quantified in terms of a distance measure between the business and competitor representatives; correlating, with the processor, the quantified level of competition with demographic data corresponding to the location information in the at least one database; and outputting the quantified level of competition.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 47 words
The computer-readable storage medium recited in claim 22 wherein the computer-readable program further includes instructions to determine the location of each of the plurality of competitor representatives by accessing an representative-locator service with the communications system on an internet web sited of the one or more competitors.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 41 words
The computer-readable storage medium as recited in claim 22 wherein the computer-readable program further includes instructions to determine the location of each of the plurality of competitor representatives by accessing a publicly available source identifying transactions performed by the competitor representatives.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 39 words
The computer-readable storage medium recited in claim 22 wherein the computer-readable program further includes instructions to operate the processor to apply a filter criterion to the correlated data to characterize geographic divisions within the demographic data by market penetration.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 52 words
The computer-readable storage medium recited in claim 25 wherein the computer-readable program further includes instructions to: generating a graphical representation of the locations according to the geographic divisions, the graphical representation including a distinction among the geographic divisions according to the filter criterion; and transmitting the graphical representation over the communication system.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 45 words
The computer-readable storage medium recited in claim 22 , wherein the instructions to calculate the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprise instructions to calculate a probability that at least one of the competitor representatives exists within a predetermined distance of each business representative.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 45 words
The computer-readable storage medium recited in claim 22 , wherein the instructions to calculate the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprise instructions to calculate a probability that at least one of the business representatives exists within a predetermined distance of each competitor representative.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 45 words
The computer-readable storage medium recited in claim 22 , wherein the instructions to calculate the probability that quantifies the level of competition comprise instructions to calculate a probability that any of the competitor representatives exists within a predetermined distance of any of the business representatives.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2009-10-30 2010-05-01 2010-10-31 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2013-10-30 2014-05-01 2014-10-31 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2017-10-30 2018-05-01 2018-10-31 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag