Patent US7062031B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US7062031B2 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Call processing system

Assignee: Assurant Inc
•
Filing: 2004-06-14
•
Granted: 2006-06-13
•
Expires: 2024-06-14
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A system that is configured for determining the value of one or at least one incoming call and routing the call for processing based on this determined value. In one embodiment, the system routes very low value calls to an automated system for processing, and directs all other calls to human operators for processing. In another embodiment, the system assigns at least one agent to one or more of a plurality of groups of agents based on the agent's past performance in executing a particular task. For example, the highest performing agents at handling a particular type of call are assigned to a first group, and the second highest performing agents at handling this type of call are assigned to a second group. In one embodiment, the most important calls are routed to the first, “highest performing” group for processing, and less important calls are routed to the second group for processing.

Inventors

  • 👤 Manuel Becerra
  • 👤 Charles Thompson
  • 👤 Glenn McMillan

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-05 10:38
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04M; H04M3/00; H04M3/42; H04M3/50; H04M3/51; H04M3/5166; H04M3/523; H04M3/5232; H04M3/5233; H04M3/5235

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 70
Claim 1
Independent Claim 93 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving an incoming call; estimating an expected lifetime value that is predicted to be derived from a caller associated wit said incoming call; assessing a priority of said incoming call based, at least in part, on said expected lifetime economic value; determining whether to route said incoming call to an automated call processing system based on said assessed priority; and in response to determining to route said incoming call to said automated call processing system, routing said incoming call to said automated call processing system.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 93 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving an incoming call; estimating an expected lifetime value that is predicted to be derived from a caller associated wit said incoming call; assessing a priority of said incoming call based, at least in part, on said expected lifetime economic value; determining whether to route said incoming call to an automated call processing system based on said assessed priority; and in response to determining to route said incoming call to said automated call processing system, routing said incoming call to said automated call processing system.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 62 words
The call processing system of claim 1 , wherein said call processing system is further configured for; determining an estimated impact that performing one or more tasks in connection with said incoming call would have on said expected lifetime economic value, wherein: said step of assessing a priority of said incoming call is based, at least in part, on said estimated impact.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 98 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving data related to an in coming call; assigning a priority value to said incoming call based on said data; and using said priority value to determine whether to route said incoming call to a live agent or to an automated call processing system for handling, wherein said call processing system is further configured for: estimating an expected lifetime value that is predicted to be derived from a caller associated with said incoming call; and determining said priority value based, at least in part, on said expected lifetime economic value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 98 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving data related to an in coming call; assigning a priority value to said incoming call based on said data; and using said priority value to determine whether to route said incoming call to a live agent or to an automated call processing system for handling, wherein said call processing system is further configured for: estimating an expected lifetime value that is predicted to be derived from a caller associated with said incoming call; and determining said priority value based, at least in part, on said expected lifetime economic value.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 53 words
The system of claim 3 , wherein said call processing system is further configured to: determine the estimated impact that performing one or more tasks in connection with said incoming call would have on said expected lifetime economic value; and determine said priority value based, at least in part, on said estimated impact.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 97 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving data related to an incoming call: assigning a priority value to said incoming call based on said data; and using said priority value to determine whether to route said incoming call to a live agent or to an automated call processing system for handling, wherein said call processing system is further configured for; estimating an expected lifetime value that is predicted to be derived from an account associated with said incoming call; and determining said priority value based, at least in part, on said expected lifetime economic value.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 97 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving data related to an incoming call: assigning a priority value to said incoming call based on said data; and using said priority value to determine whether to route said incoming call to a live agent or to an automated call processing system for handling, wherein said call processing system is further configured for; estimating an expected lifetime value that is predicted to be derived from an account associated with said incoming call; and determining said priority value based, at least in part, on said expected lifetime economic value.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 51 words
The system of claim 5 , wherein said system is further configured to: determine the estimated impact that performing one or more tasks in connection with said incoming call would have on said expected lifetime economic value; and determine said priority value based, at least in part, on said estimated impact.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 90 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving a call from a customer, said call being related to the cancellation of a first service; determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to replace said first service with a particular product or second service; and at least partly in response to determining that it would not be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to replace said first service wit a particular product or second service, routing said call to an automated call processing system.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 90 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving a call from a customer, said call being related to the cancellation of a first service; determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to replace said first service with a particular product or second service; and at least partly in response to determining that it would not be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to replace said first service wit a particular product or second service, routing said call to an automated call processing system.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 59 words
The system of claim 7 , wherein said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to replace said first service with a particular product or second service comprises assessing whether it would be more profitable to have said customer retain said first service than to purchase said particular product or second service.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 49 words
The system of claim 7 , wherein said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to replace said first service with a particular product or second service comprises assessing whether an account associated with said call has been profitable in the past.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 55 words
The system of claim 7 , wherein said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to replace said first service with a particular product or second service comprises estimating the chances of persuading said customer to replace said first service with said particular product or said second service.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 57 words
A call processing system that is configured for: processing calls from one or more customers related to a debt cancellation contract; and for at least a particular one of said calls, allowing a customer associated with said particular call to cancel said debt cancellation contract, via said particular call, substantially without the assistance of a human operator.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 57 words
A call processing system that is configured for: processing calls from one or more customers related to a debt cancellation contract; and for at least a particular one of said calls, allowing a customer associated with said particular call to cancel said debt cancellation contract, via said particular call, substantially without the assistance of a human operator.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 57 words
A call processing system that is configured for: processing calls from one or more customers related to a debt deferment contract; and for at least a particular one of said calls, allowing a customer associated with said particular call to cancel said debt deferment contract, via said particular call, substantially without the assistance of a human operator.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 57 words
A call processing system that is configured for: processing calls from one or more customers related to a debt deferment contract; and for at least a particular one of said calls, allowing a customer associated with said particular call to cancel said debt deferment contract, via said particular call, substantially without the assistance of a human operator.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 234 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving information related to an incoming call; using said information to determine whether it would be beneficial to have a human representative handle said incoming call; and in response to determining that it would not be beneficial to have a human representative handle said incoming call, routing said call to an automated call processing system, wherein; said incoming call is a first incoming call that is in a queue with at least a second incoming call; said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to have a human representative handle said first incoming call comprises: using at least one statistical model to estimate the expected future profitability of a first caller, said first caner being associated with said first incoming call and said at least one statistical model being based on a plurality of variables; using said at least one statistical model to estimate the expected future profitability of a second caller, said second caller being associated with said second incoming call; and comparing said expected future profitability of said first caller with said expected future profitability of said second caller; at least partially in response to determining that said expected future profitability of said second caner is greater than said expected future profitability of said first caller, determining that it would not be beneficial to have a human representative handle said first incoming call.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 234 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving information related to an incoming call; using said information to determine whether it would be beneficial to have a human representative handle said incoming call; and in response to determining that it would not be beneficial to have a human representative handle said incoming call, routing said call to an automated call processing system, wherein; said incoming call is a first incoming call that is in a queue with at least a second incoming call; said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to have a human representative handle said first incoming call comprises: using at least one statistical model to estimate the expected future profitability of a first caller, said first caner being associated with said first incoming call and said at least one statistical model being based on a plurality of variables; using said at least one statistical model to estimate the expected future profitability of a second caller, said second caller being associated with said second incoming call; and comparing said expected future profitability of said first caller with said expected future profitability of said second caller; at least partially in response to determining that said expected future profitability of said second caner is greater than said expected future profitability of said first caller, determining that it would not be beneficial to have a human representative handle said first incoming call.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 85 words
The system of claim 13 , wherein: said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to have a human representative handle said first incoming call comprises: assessing human resources available to handle calls in said queue of calls; at least partially in response to determining that insufficient human resources exist to handle both said first incoming call and said second incoming call according to predetermined service criteria, determining that it would not be beneficial to have a human representative handle said first incoming call.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 137 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said call processing system is configured for: calculating an estimated value of future profits to be generated from said particular customer if an agent performs said one or more particular tasks successfully in regard to said incoming call; and determining said importance of said incoming call based, at least in part, on said estimated value of future profits.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 137 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said call processing system is configured for: calculating an estimated value of future profits to be generated from said particular customer if an agent performs said one or more particular tasks successfully in regard to said incoming call; and determining said importance of said incoming call based, at least in part, on said estimated value of future profits.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 49 words
The system of claim 15 , wherein said call processing system is configured for: determining an estimated probability that said one or more particular tasks will be successfully performed by an agent; and determining said importance of said incoming call based, at least in part, on said estimated probability.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 121 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and wherein said call processing system is configured for: determining the estimated probability that said one or more particular tasks will be successfully performed by an agent; and determining said importance of said incoming call based, at least in part, on said estimated probability.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 121 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and wherein said call processing system is configured for: determining the estimated probability that said one or more particular tasks will be successfully performed by an agent; and determining said importance of said incoming call based, at least in part, on said estimated probability.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 49 words
The system of claim 17 , wherein said call processing system is configured for: assessing the availability of said particular group of agents; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents based at least in part on said assessed availability of said particular group of agents.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 96 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers not to cancel a service.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 96 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers not to cancel a service.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 95 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to purchase an insurance policy.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 95 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to purchase an insurance policy.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 97 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to purchase a debt protection contract.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 97 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to purchase a debt protection contract.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 98 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to purchase an alternative service or product.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim 98 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to purchase an alternative service or product.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim 154 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to purchase an alternative service or product; said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to retain a service or product; and said system is configured to assess said particular agent's past performance in persuading customers to retain or purchase a product or service based on said particular agent's sold revenue value for one of more days in the past.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim 154 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said incoming call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to purchase an alternative service or product; said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to retain a service or product; and said system is configured to assess said particular agent's past performance in persuading customers to retain or purchase a product or service based on said particular agent's sold revenue value for one of more days in the past.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim 96 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to retain a service or product.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim 96 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call, said call being made by a particular customer; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein: at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based on said particular agent's past performance in completing one or more particular tasks, and said one or more particular tasks comprises persuading one or more customers to retain a service or product.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim 56 words
The call processing system of claim 24 , wherein said system is configured for measuring said particular agent's past performance in persuading customers to retain a product or service based on data comprising the length of time that one or more customers retained a product or service after speaking with said particular agent in the past.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim 45 words
The call processing system of claim 24 , wherein said system is configured for measuring said particular agent's past performance in persuading customers to retain a product or service based on said particular agent's call save rate for one or more days in the past.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim 44 words
The call processing system of claim 24 , wherein said system is configured for measuring said particular agent's performance for persuading customers to retain a product or service based on said particular agent's saved revenue value for one or more days in the past.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim 68 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based, at least in part, on said particular agent's saved revenue rate performance.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim 68 words
A call processing system that is configured for: assessing the importance of an incoming call; and routing said incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on said importance of said incoming call, wherein at least one particular agent within said group of agents has been assigned to said group of agents based, at least in part, on said particular agent's saved revenue rate performance.
Claim 45
Independent Claim 135 words
A method of routing a call for processing, said method comprising: identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more highest performing agents who are among the highest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing at least one task; assessing the value of a particular call; determining whether to route said particular call to said group of highest performing agents for processing based on said assessed value of said particular call; identifying from said plurality of agents, a group of one or more “lowest performing” agents who are among the lowest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; and determining whether to route said particular call to said group of “lowest performing agents” for processing based on said assessed value of said particular call.
Claim 46
Independent Claim 135 words
A method of routing a call for processing, said method comprising: identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more highest performing agents who are among the highest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing at least one task; assessing the value of a particular call; determining whether to route said particular call to said group of highest performing agents for processing based on said assessed value of said particular call; identifying from said plurality of agents, a group of one or more “lowest performing” agents who are among the lowest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; and determining whether to route said particular call to said group of “lowest performing agents” for processing based on said assessed value of said particular call.
Claim 47
Independent Claim 75 words
A method of routing a call for processing comprising: identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more “lowest performing” agents who are among the lowest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; assessing the value of a particular call; and determining whether to route said particular call to said group of “lowest performing agents” for processing based on said assessed value of said particular call.
Claim 48
Independent Claim 75 words
A method of routing a call for processing comprising: identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more “lowest performing” agents who are among the lowest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; assessing the value of a particular call; and determining whether to route said particular call to said group of “lowest performing agents” for processing based on said assessed value of said particular call.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method of claim 30 , wherein said particular call is an incoming call.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method of claim 30 , wherein said particular call is an outbound call.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method of claim 30 , further comprising routing said call to said group of “lowest performing agents” in response to determining that said call is a relatively low-value call.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 30 , wherein said one or more tasks comprises persuading a customer not to cancel a service.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 30 , wherein said one or more tasks comprises persuading a customer to purchase a product or service.
Claim 54
Independent Claim 170 words
A method of routing calls comprising: assigning a first performance rating to a first agent; assigning a second performance rating to a second agent; assigning a third performance rating to a third agent; in response to said first performance rating being above a pre-determined first threshold value, assigning said first agent to a first group of agents; in response to said second performance rating being below a pre-determined second threshold value, assigning said second agent to a second group of agents; in response to said third performance rating being below said first threshold value and above said second threshold value, assigning said third agent to a third group of agents; determining a value of a call; and routing a call to a selected one of said first, second, third groups of agents based, at least in part, on said value of said call, wherein: at least one of said first, second, or third performance ratings corresponds to an agent's past performance in persuading a customer not to cancel a service.
Claim 55
Independent Claim 170 words
A method of routing calls comprising: assigning a first performance rating to a first agent; assigning a second performance rating to a second agent; assigning a third performance rating to a third agent; in response to said first performance rating being above a pre-determined first threshold value, assigning said first agent to a first group of agents; in response to said second performance rating being below a pre-determined second threshold value, assigning said second agent to a second group of agents; in response to said third performance rating being below said first threshold value and above said second threshold value, assigning said third agent to a third group of agents; determining a value of a call; and routing a call to a selected one of said first, second, third groups of agents based, at least in part, on said value of said call, wherein: at least one of said first, second, or third performance ratings corresponds to an agent's past performance in persuading a customer not to cancel a service.
Claim 56
Independent Claim 134 words
A method of routing a correspondence for processing, said method comprising: identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more “higher performing” agents who are among the highest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing at least one task; assessing the value of a particular correspondence; determining whether to route said particular correspondence to said group of “higher performing agents” for processing based on said assessed value of said particular correspondence; identifying, from said plurality of agents, a group of one or more “lower performing” agents who are among the lowest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; and determining whether to route said particular call to said group of “lower performing” for processing based on said assessed value of said particular call.
Claim 57
Independent Claim 134 words
A method of routing a correspondence for processing, said method comprising: identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more “higher performing” agents who are among the highest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing at least one task; assessing the value of a particular correspondence; determining whether to route said particular correspondence to said group of “higher performing agents” for processing based on said assessed value of said particular correspondence; identifying, from said plurality of agents, a group of one or more “lower performing” agents who are among the lowest performing agents within said plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; and determining whether to route said particular call to said group of “lower performing” for processing based on said assessed value of said particular call.
Claim 58
Independent Claim 191 words
A method of routing a call for processing, said method comprising the steps of: (A) assessing the past performance of a first agent in performing one or more tasks; (B) assessing the past performance of a second agent in performing said one or more tasks; (C) comparing said past performance of said first agent with said past performance of said second agent; (D) for a first call in a queue of calls, assessing a first estimated benefit associated with attempting to persuade a first customer associated with said first call not to cancel a particular service; (E) for a second call in said queue of calls, assessing a second estimated benefit associated with attempting to persuade a second customer associated with said second call not to cancel a particular service; and (F) routing said first call to said first agent for handling in response to determining: (1) that said first estimated benefit is greater than said second estimated benefit; (2) that said past performance of said first agent is better than said past performance of said second agent; and (3) that said first agent is available to handle said first call.
Claim 59
Independent Claim 191 words
A method of routing a call for processing, said method comprising the steps of: (A) assessing the past performance of a first agent in performing one or more tasks; (B) assessing the past performance of a second agent in performing said one or more tasks; (C) comparing said past performance of said first agent with said past performance of said second agent; (D) for a first call in a queue of calls, assessing a first estimated benefit associated with attempting to persuade a first customer associated with said first call not to cancel a particular service; (E) for a second call in said queue of calls, assessing a second estimated benefit associated with attempting to persuade a second customer associated with said second call not to cancel a particular service; and (F) routing said first call to said first agent for handling in response to determining: (1) that said first estimated benefit is greater than said second estimated benefit; (2) that said past performance of said first agent is better than said past performance of said second agent; and (3) that said first agent is available to handle said first call.
Claim 60
Dependent Claim 35 words
The meted of claim 38 , further comprising: (G) in response to determining that said first agent is not available to handle said first call, routing said first call to said second agent for handling.
Claim 61
Dependent Claim 75 words
The method of claim 38 , further comprising: (G) determining whether routing said first call to said first agent for handling would satisfy a pre-determined average speed of answer requirement; and (H) said step of routing said first call to said first agent for handling is executed at least in part in response to determining that routing said first call to said first agent for handling would satisfy said pre-determined average speed of answer requirement.
Claim 62
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method of claim 40 , further comprising: (I) in response to determining that routing said first call to said first agent for handling would not satisfy said pre-determined average speed of answer requirement, routing said first call to said second agent for handling.
Claim 63
Dependent Claim 71 words
The method of claim 38 , farther comprising: (G) determining whether routing said first call to said first agent for handling would satisfy a pre-determined service level requirement; and (H) said step of routing said first call to said first agent for handling is executed at least in pan in response to determining that routing said first call to said first agent for handling would satisfy a pre-determined service level requirement.
Claim 64
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method of claim 42 , further comprising: (I) in response to determining that routing said first call to said first agent for handling would not satisfy said pre-determined service level requirement, routing said first call to said second agent for handling.
Claim 65
Dependent Claim 69 words
The method of claim 38 , further comprising: (G) determining an estimated effect that routing said first call to said first agent would have on said first agent's ability to complete one or more tasks in regard to said first call; and (H) said step of routing said first call to said first agent for handling is executed at least in part in response to said determined estimated effect.
Claim 66
Dependent Claim 84 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving a call from a customer, said call being related to the purchase of a product or service or potential purchase of a product or service; determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to purchase said product or service; and in response to determining that it would not be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to purchase said product or service, routing said call to an automated call processing system.
Claim 67
Dependent Claim 84 words
A call processing system that is configured for: receiving a call from a customer, said call being related to the purchase of a product or service or potential purchase of a product or service; determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to purchase said product or service; and in response to determining that it would not be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to purchase said product or service, routing said call to an automated call processing system.
Claim 68
Dependent Claim 42 words
The system of claim 45 , wherein said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to purchase said product or service comprises assessing the profitability associated with having said customer purchase said product or service.
Claim 69
Dependent Claim 41 words
The system of claim 45 , wherein said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to purchase said product or service comprises assessing the probability that said customer will purchase said product or service.
Claim 70
Dependent Claim 56 words
The system of claim 45 , wherein said step of determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade said customer to purchase said product or service comprises assessing: (1) the probability that said customer will purchase said product or service; and (2) the profitability associated with having said customer purchase said product or service.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2009-06-12 2009-12-12 2010-06-13 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2013-06-12 2013-12-12 2014-06-13 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2017-06-12 2017-12-12 2018-06-13 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag