Patent US6714918B2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6714918B2
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for detecting fraudulent transactions
Assignee: Access Business Group International LLC
•
Filing: 2002-11-18
•
Granted: 2004-03-30
•
Expires: 2022-11-18
Abstract
Abstract A system for detecting fraudulent transactions is disclosed. The system breaks the transaction down into its component parameters. A first score is computed depending on the propensity of the transacted commodity to be involved in fraud. A second score is computed as a function of the authentication of the remaining parameters of the transaction. A total fraud score is computed from the first score and the second score and compared against a fraud threshold to determine the likelihood of the transaction being fraudulent.
Inventors
- 👤 James M. Hillmer
- 👤 Richard A. Jones
- 👤 Colleen M. Gessner
- 👤 Connie S. Johnston
- 👤 Kelly R. Lewis, Jr.
- 👤 Sanjay H. Deshpande
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 12:23
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q20/00; G06Q20/38; G06Q20/40; G06Q20/401; G06Q20/4016; G06F; G06F7/00; G06F7/06; G06F7/08; G06Q20/22; G06Q20/24; G06Q20/403; G06Q20/4037; G06Q20/405; G06Q40/00; G06Q40/02; G06Q40/03; G07; G07F; G07F7/00; G07F7/08
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
400 words
A computer implemented system for detecting fraudulent transactions between a customer and a vendor, said computer comprising a memory and a processor coupled with said memory, said system comprising: a positive database comprising data representing a plurality of past non-fraudulent transactions known to said vendor; a negative database comprising data representing a plurality of past known fraudulent transactions; one or more transaction databases comprising consumer and geographic transaction information; a commodity database comprising data representing valuation and propensity to incite fraudulent activity for a plurality of commodities; transaction logic resident in said memory and operative to be executed by said processor to receive a transaction of a commodity from a vendor and decompose said transaction into a plurality of transaction parameters, said plurality of transaction parameters being characterized by an authenticity; result logic resident in said memory and operative to be executed by said processor to send an indication to said vendor whether said transaction is one of fraudulent and non-fraudulent; valuation logic resident in said memory and coupled with said transaction logic, said result logic and said commodity database and operative to be executed by said processor to compute the total value of said transaction and cause said result logic to indicate that said transaction is non-fraudulent if said total value is less than a first pre-determined threshold; comparison logic resident in said memory and coupled with said transaction logic, said result logic and said positive database and operative to be executed by said processor to compare said transaction with said positive database and cause said result logic to indicate that said transaction is non-fraudulent if said transaction matches at least one of said plurality of past non-fraudulent transactions in said positive database; and fraud logic resident in said memory and coupled with said transaction logic, said result logic and said negative database, said one or more transaction databases and said commodity database and operative to be executed by said processor to compute a first score as a function of said past fraudulent transactions and said propensity to incite fraudulent activity of said commodity, a second score as a function of said authenticity of said plurality of transaction parameters and a fraud score as a function of said first and second scores, said fraud logic being further operative to cause said result logic to indicate that said transaction is fraudulent if said fraud score exceeds a second pre-determined threshold.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
400 words
A computer implemented system for detecting fraudulent transactions between a customer and a vendor, said computer comprising a memory and a processor coupled with said memory, said system comprising: a positive database comprising data representing a plurality of past non-fraudulent transactions known to said vendor; a negative database comprising data representing a plurality of past known fraudulent transactions; one or more transaction databases comprising consumer and geographic transaction information; a commodity database comprising data representing valuation and propensity to incite fraudulent activity for a plurality of commodities; transaction logic resident in said memory and operative to be executed by said processor to receive a transaction of a commodity from a vendor and decompose said transaction into a plurality of transaction parameters, said plurality of transaction parameters being characterized by an authenticity; result logic resident in said memory and operative to be executed by said processor to send an indication to said vendor whether said transaction is one of fraudulent and non-fraudulent; valuation logic resident in said memory and coupled with said transaction logic, said result logic and said commodity database and operative to be executed by said processor to compute the total value of said transaction and cause said result logic to indicate that said transaction is non-fraudulent if said total value is less than a first pre-determined threshold; comparison logic resident in said memory and coupled with said transaction logic, said result logic and said positive database and operative to be executed by said processor to compare said transaction with said positive database and cause said result logic to indicate that said transaction is non-fraudulent if said transaction matches at least one of said plurality of past non-fraudulent transactions in said positive database; and fraud logic resident in said memory and coupled with said transaction logic, said result logic and said negative database, said one or more transaction databases and said commodity database and operative to be executed by said processor to compute a first score as a function of said past fraudulent transactions and said propensity to incite fraudulent activity of said commodity, a second score as a function of said authenticity of said plurality of transaction parameters and a fraud score as a function of said first and second scores, said fraud logic being further operative to cause said result logic to indicate that said transaction is fraudulent if said fraud score exceeds a second pre-determined threshold.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
111 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein one or more of said positive database, said negative database, said one or more transaction databases, said commodity database, said transaction logic, said result logic, said valuation logic, said comparison logic and said fraud logic operates on a computer system internal to said vendor and the remaining of said one or more of said positive database, said negative database, said one or more transaction databases, said commodity database, said transaction logic, said result logic, said valuation logic, said comparison logic and said fraud logic operates on a computer system external to said vendor, said internal and external computer systems in communication with each other.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein said fraud logic is further coupled with said valuation logic and further wherein said second score is dynamically adjusted as a function of said total value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
34 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein said fraud logic is further coupled with said valuation logic and further wherein said second pre-determined threshold is dynamically adjusted as a function of said total value.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
18 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein said system is operative to process said transaction in real time.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
30 words
The system of claim 1 , wherein said system is operative to receive two or more of said transactions and process said two or more of said transactions in batch.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
FR418144A
Cited
GB421808A
Cited
DE891068C
Cited
JPS6274768A
Cited
JPS63184870A
Cited
US5025372A
Cited
WO1989006398A1
Cited
EP0468229A2
Cited
JPH04113220A
Cited
JPH04220758A
Cited
US5163086A
Cited
EP0500245A2
Cited
US5416067A
Cited
US5819226A
Cited
US5936541A
Cited
US5950121A
Cited
US5832068A
Cited
US5627886A
Cited
US5774525A
Cited
US5884289A
Cited
US6154146A
Cited
US5805686A
Cited
US5745654A
Cited
US5790645A
Cited
US5895453A
Cited
US6219771B1
Cited
US6018723A
Cited
US6029154A
Cited
US6163771A
Cited
US5936221A
Cited
US6095413A
Cited
US6298336B1
Cited
US6516413B1
Cited
US6163604A
Cited
US6464134B1
Cited
US6418436B1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2007-03-30 | 2007-09-29 | 2008-03-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2011-03-30 | 2011-09-29 | 2012-03-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2015-03-30 | 2015-09-29 | 2016-03-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |