Patent US6539331B1 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6539331B1
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Microscopic feature dimension measurement system
Assignee: KLA Tencor Technologies Corp
•
Filing: 2000-09-08
•
Granted: 2003-03-25
•
Expires: 2020-09-08
Abstract
Abstract A measurement tool connects to an automatic inspection machine for measuring microscopic characteristics of features on a photographic mask. Widths of densely packed lines are measured for features having sizes of less than about the wavelength of the examining radiation. A simulated intensity profile is subtracted from the actual measured intensity profile to obtain an error profile. The error profile provides edge position corrections which adjust the originally estimated edge positions. A new, simulated intensity profile is created and the process is repeated until the error profile is deemed acceptable. The line width is measured by measuring between the estimated edge positions. The opacity of a feature is determined and used for correcting dimension measurements. A formula determines the opacity based upon the contrast, the measured dimension and the single data point. Width or height of an irregular feature is calculated accurately. Dimension of the feature is determined using the peak width data and the peak width standard deviation.
Inventors
- 👤 Peter J. Fiekowsky
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 01:17
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F1/00; G03F1/68; G03F1/82; G03F1/84; G03F1/86
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
162 words
A method of measuring a dimension of a microscopic feature in the presence of an interfering feature, the distance between said feature to be measured and said interfering feature is less than about 1.5 times the wavelength used to measure said feature, said method comprising: receiving an image of a region of interest, said region of interest including an image of said feature to be measured and an image of an edge of said interfering feature; determining an intensity profile for said region of interest; calculating estimated edge positions for the edges of said feature to be measured and said interfering feature; creating a simulated intensity profile for said region of interest based upon said estimated edge positions; determining an error intensity profile representing the difference between said intensity profile and said simulated intensity profile; and calculating new estimated edge positions using said error intensity profile, whereby the dimension of said microscopic feature may be calculated using said new estimated edge positions.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
162 words
A method of measuring a dimension of a microscopic feature in the presence of an interfering feature, the distance between said feature to be measured and said interfering feature is less than about 1.5 times the wavelength used to measure said feature, said method comprising: receiving an image of a region of interest, said region of interest including an image of said feature to be measured and an image of an edge of said interfering feature; determining an intensity profile for said region of interest; calculating estimated edge positions for the edges of said feature to be measured and said interfering feature; creating a simulated intensity profile for said region of interest based upon said estimated edge positions; determining an error intensity profile representing the difference between said intensity profile and said simulated intensity profile; and calculating new estimated edge positions using said error intensity profile, whereby the dimension of said microscopic feature may be calculated using said new estimated edge positions.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
64 words
A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising repeating the following until an error is acceptable: recreating a simulated intensity profile for said region of interest based upon said newly calculated estimated edge positions; determining an error intensity profile representing the difference between said intensity profile and said recreated simulated intensity profile; and calculating new estimated edge positions using said error intensity profile.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
62 words
A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said element of creating a simulated intensity profile includes the sub-steps of: convolving reference edge profiles to obtain an individual simulated profile for each of said feature to be measured and for said interfering feature; and adding said individual simulated profiles of said feature and said interfering feature to create said simulated intensity profile.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
52 words
A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising: creating a simulated interfering edge profile; subtracting said simulated interfering edge profile from said intensity profile to obtain an isolated intensity profile of said feature to be measured; and determining said dimension of said feature to be measured using said isolated intensity profile.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said feature is a line and said dimension is the width of said line.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said feature is present on a mask used to manufacture a semiconductor device.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
163 words
A method of measuring a dimension of a microscopic feature in the presence of an interfering feature, the distance between said feature to be measured and said interfering feature is less than about 1.5 times the wavelength used to measure to said feature, said method comprising: receiving an intensity profile for a region of interest, said region of interest including an image of said feature to be measured and an image of an edge of said interfering feature; estimating edge positions for the edges of said feature to be measured and said interfering feature; creating a simulated intensity profile for said region of interest based upon said estimated edge positions; calculating edge positions errors for the edges of said feature to be measured and said interfering feature using said intensity profile and said simulated intensity profile; and calculating new estimated edge positions using said edge positions errors, whereby the dimension of said microscopic feature may be calculated using said new estimated edge positions.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
163 words
A method of measuring a dimension of a microscopic feature in the presence of an interfering feature, the distance between said feature to be measured and said interfering feature is less than about 1.5 times the wavelength used to measure to said feature, said method comprising: receiving an intensity profile for a region of interest, said region of interest including an image of said feature to be measured and an image of an edge of said interfering feature; estimating edge positions for the edges of said feature to be measured and said interfering feature; creating a simulated intensity profile for said region of interest based upon said estimated edge positions; calculating edge positions errors for the edges of said feature to be measured and said interfering feature using said intensity profile and said simulated intensity profile; and calculating new estimated edge positions using said edge positions errors, whereby the dimension of said microscopic feature may be calculated using said new estimated edge positions.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
75 words
A method as recited in claim 7 further comprising repeating the following until said edge positions errors are acceptable: recreating a simulated intensity profile for said region of interest based upon said newly calculated estimated edge positions; recalculating edge positions errors for the edges of said feature to be measured and said interfering feature using said intensity profile and said recreated simulated intensity profile; and calculating new estimated edge positions using said edge positions errors.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
62 words
A method as recited in claim 7 wherein said element of creating a simulated intensity profile includes the sub-steps of: convolving reference edge profiles to obtain an individual simulated profile for each of said feature to be measured and for said interfering feature; and adding said individual simulated profiles of said feature and said interfering feature to create said simulated intensity profile.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
52 words
A method as recited in claim 7 further comprising: creating a simulated interfering edge profile; subtracting said simulated interfering edge profile from said intensity profile to obtain an isolated intensity profile of said feature to be measured; and determining said dimension of said feature to be measured using said isolated intensity profile.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method as recited in claim 7 wherein said feature is a line and said dimension is the width of said line.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method as recited in claim 7 wherein said feature is present on a mask used to manufacture a semiconductor device.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
44 words
A mask used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, said mask resulting from a method of measuring a dimension of a microscopic feature in the presence of an interfering feature, wherein said method is as recited in any of claims 1 through 12 .
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
42 words
A semiconductor device, said semiconductor device resulting from a method of measuring a dimension of a microscopic feature in the presence of an interfering feature on a mask, wherein said method is as recited in any of claims 1 through 12 .
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5633735A
Cited
US5294803A
Cited
US5614990A
Cited
US5862058A
Cited
US5804336A
Cited
US5966677A
Cited
US6167355A
Cited
US5994711A
Cited
US6271535B1
Cited
US6178360B1
Cited
US6181474B1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2006-03-24 | 2006-09-23 | 2007-03-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2010-03-24 | 2010-09-23 | 2011-03-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2014-03-24 | 2014-09-23 | 2015-03-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |