Patent US4564837A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US6463403B1 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US6463403B1 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

System and method for process matching

Assignee: Micron Technology Inc
•
Filing: 1999-12-14
•
Granted: 2002-10-08
•
Expires: 2019-12-14
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A computer-implemented method for matching parameters of outputs generated by a first and second process. The first process generates a first output having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter, and the second process generates a second output having the characteristic measurable by a second parameter. A computer having a processing unit and memory is provided. The computer generates a first model of the first parameter for the first process and a second model of the second parameter for the second process. The computer generates a first simulated output of the first process using the first model. A correction, which is a function of the second model and which compensates for the effect of the second process on the second parameter, is applied to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output. The second process is applied to the corrected output to generate with the computer thereby a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.

Inventors

  • 👤 James Burdorf
  • 👤 Christophe Pierrat

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 10:50
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70483; G03F7/70491; G03F7/705; G03F7/70425; G03F7/70433; G03F7/70441; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S430/00; Y10S430/143; Y10S430/167; Y10S430/168

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 31
Claim 1
Independent Claim 130 words
A computer system, comprising: means for generating a first model and a second model for a first and second parameter, respectively, wherein the parameters measure a characteristic of a first output of a first photolithographic process and of a second output of a second photolithographic process; means for generating a first simulated output of the first photolithographic process by using the first model; means for applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second photolithographic process on the second parameter; and means for applying the second photolithographic process to the corrected output generating thereby a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 130 words
A computer system, comprising: means for generating a first model and a second model for a first and second parameter, respectively, wherein the parameters measure a characteristic of a first output of a first photolithographic process and of a second output of a second photolithographic process; means for generating a first simulated output of the first photolithographic process by using the first model; means for applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second photolithographic process on the second parameter; and means for applying the second photolithographic process to the corrected output generating thereby a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 20 words
The computer system according to claim 1 , wherein the first and second photolithographic processes are applied to a mask.
Claim 4
Independent Claim 187 words
An apparatus, comprising: a computer readable medium having computer readable program code embodied thereon, the computer readable program code, when executed, implementing on a computer a method for matching parameters of generated outputs of a first photolithographic process and a second photolithographic process, wherein the first photolithographic process generates a first output having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter, and wherein the second photolithographic process generates a second output having the characteristic measurable by a second parameter, the method comprising the steps of: generating a first model of the first parameter for the first photolithographic process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second photolithographic process; generating a first simulated output of the first photolithographic process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second photolithographic process on the second parameter; and applying the second photolithographic process to the corrected output generating thereby a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 5
Independent Claim 187 words
An apparatus, comprising: a computer readable medium having computer readable program code embodied thereon, the computer readable program code, when executed, implementing on a computer a method for matching parameters of generated outputs of a first photolithographic process and a second photolithographic process, wherein the first photolithographic process generates a first output having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter, and wherein the second photolithographic process generates a second output having the characteristic measurable by a second parameter, the method comprising the steps of: generating a first model of the first parameter for the first photolithographic process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second photolithographic process; generating a first simulated output of the first photolithographic process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second photolithographic process on the second parameter; and applying the second photolithographic process to the corrected output generating thereby a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 43 words
In the apparatus, as recited in claim 3 , the computer readable medium further having computer readable program code, when executed, implementing on a computer a method further comprising the step of generating from the corrected output a second simulated output for verification.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 18 words
In the apparatus, as recited in claim 3 , wherein the first and second outputs are wafer images.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 216 words
A computer program product, comprising: a computer usable medium having a computer readable code means embodied therein for matching parameters of a first and second output of a first photolithographic process and second photolithographic process, comprising: computer readable program code means for generating a first output from a first photolithographic process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; computer readable program code means for generating a second output from a second photolithographic process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; computer readable program code means for generating a first model of the first parameter for the first photolithographic process; computer readable program code means for generating a second model of the second parameter for the second photolithographic process; computer readable program code means for generating a first simulated output of the first photolithographic process using the first model; computer readable program code means for applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second photolithographic process on the second parameter; and computer readable program code means for applying the second photolithographic process to the corrected output generating thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 216 words
A computer program product, comprising: a computer usable medium having a computer readable code means embodied therein for matching parameters of a first and second output of a first photolithographic process and second photolithographic process, comprising: computer readable program code means for generating a first output from a first photolithographic process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; computer readable program code means for generating a second output from a second photolithographic process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; computer readable program code means for generating a first model of the first parameter for the first photolithographic process; computer readable program code means for generating a second model of the second parameter for the second photolithographic process; computer readable program code means for generating a first simulated output of the first photolithographic process using the first model; computer readable program code means for applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second photolithographic process on the second parameter; and computer readable program code means for applying the second photolithographic process to the corrected output generating thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 27 words
The computer program product of claim 6 , further comprising a computer readable program means for generating from the corrected output a second simulated output for verification.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 32 words
The computer program product of claim 6 , wherein the computer readable program code means for applying a correction further comprises a computer readable program means for applying an optical proximity correction.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 32 words
The computer program product of claim 6 , wherein the computer readable program code means for applying a correction further comprises a computer readable program means for applying a topography effect correction.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 17 words
The computer program product of claim 6 , wherein the first and second outputs are wafer images.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 186 words
A computer program product, comprising: a computer usable medium having a computer readable code means embodied therein for performing a method of matching parameters of generated outputs of a first ion projection process and a second ion projection process, the method comprising: generating a first output from the first ion projection process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; generating a second output from the second ion projection process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; generating a first model of the first parameter for the first ion projection process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second ion projection process; generating a first simulated output of the first ion projection process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second ion projection process on the second parameter; and applying the second ion projection process to the corrected output thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 186 words
A computer program product, comprising: a computer usable medium having a computer readable code means embodied therein for performing a method of matching parameters of generated outputs of a first ion projection process and a second ion projection process, the method comprising: generating a first output from the first ion projection process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; generating a second output from the second ion projection process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; generating a first model of the first parameter for the first ion projection process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second ion projection process; generating a first simulated output of the first ion projection process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second ion projection process on the second parameter; and applying the second ion projection process to the corrected output thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 21 words
The computer program product of claim 11 , further comprising generating from the corrected output a second simulated output for verification.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 22 words
The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein the first and second ion projection processes are applied to a stencil mask.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 186 words
A computer program product, comprising: a computer usable medium having a computer readable code means embodied therein for performing a method for matching parameters of generated outputs of a first x-ray projection process and a second x-ray projection process, the method comprising: generating a first output from the first x-ray projection process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; generating a second output from the second x-ray projection process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; generating a first model of the first parameter for the first x-ray projection process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second x-ray projection process; generating a first simulated output of the first x-ray projection process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second x-ray projection process on the second parameter; and applying the second x-ray projection process to the corrected output thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 186 words
A computer program product, comprising: a computer usable medium having a computer readable code means embodied therein for performing a method for matching parameters of generated outputs of a first x-ray projection process and a second x-ray projection process, the method comprising: generating a first output from the first x-ray projection process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; generating a second output from the second x-ray projection process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; generating a first model of the first parameter for the first x-ray projection process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second x-ray projection process; generating a first simulated output of the first x-ray projection process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second x-ray projection process on the second parameter; and applying the second x-ray projection process to the corrected output thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 21 words
The computer program product of claim 14 , further comprising generating from the corrected output a second simulated output for verification.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 21 words
The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the first and second x-ray projection processes are applied to a mask.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 186 words
A computer program product, comprising: a computer usable medium having a computer readable code means embodied therein for performing a method for matching parameters of generated outputs of a first e-beam projection process and a second e-beam projection process, the method comprising: generating a first output from the first e-beam projection process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; generating a second output from the second e-beam projection process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; generating a first model of the first parameter for the first e-beam projection process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second e-beam projection process; generating a first simulated output of the first e-beam projection process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second e-beam projection process on the second parameter; and applying the second e-beam projection process to the corrected output thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 186 words
A computer program product, comprising: a computer usable medium having a computer readable code means embodied therein for performing a method for matching parameters of generated outputs of a first e-beam projection process and a second e-beam projection process, the method comprising: generating a first output from the first e-beam projection process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; generating a second output from the second e-beam projection process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; generating a first model of the first parameter for the first e-beam projection process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second e-beam projection process; generating a first simulated output of the first e-beam projection process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second e-beam projection process on the second parameter; and applying the second e-beam projection process to the corrected output thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 21 words
The computer program product of claim 17 , further comprising generating from the corrected output a second simulated output for verification.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 21 words
The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the first and second x-ray projection processes are applied to a mask.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 197 words
A computer comprising: a central processing unit; and a computer readable medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon, the computer executable instructions for execution by the central processing unit and for causing the computer to execute a method of matching parameters of a first and second output of a first photolithographic process and second photolithographic process, the method comprising: generating a first output from a first photolithographic process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; generating a second output from a second photolithographic process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; generating a first model of the first parameter for the first photolithographic process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second photolithographic process; generating a first simulated output of the first photolithographic process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second photolithographic process on the second parameter; and applying the second photolithographic process to the corrected output generating thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 197 words
A computer comprising: a central processing unit; and a computer readable medium having computer executable instructions stored thereon, the computer executable instructions for execution by the central processing unit and for causing the computer to execute a method of matching parameters of a first and second output of a first photolithographic process and second photolithographic process, the method comprising: generating a first output from a first photolithographic process having a characteristic measurable by a first parameter; generating a second output from a second photolithographic process having a characteristic measurable by a second parameter; generating a first model of the first parameter for the first photolithographic process; generating a second model of the second parameter for the second photolithographic process; generating a first simulated output of the first photolithographic process using the first model; applying a correction to the first simulated output to obtain a corrected output, wherein the correction is a function of the second model and wherein the correction compensates for the effect of the second photolithographic process on the second parameter; and applying the second photolithographic process to the corrected output generating thereby generating a third output matching the first parameter of the first output.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 23 words
The computer of claim 20 , further comprising computer executable instructions for generating from the corrected output a second simulated output for verification.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 23 words
The computer of claim 20 , wherein applying a correction further comprises a computer readable program means for applying an optical proximity correction.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 23 words
The computer of claim 20 , wherein applying a correction further comprises a computer readable program means for applying a topography effect correction.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 15 words
The computer of claim 20 , wherein the first and second outputs are wafer images.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US5394322A Cited
US5825645A Cited
US5783341A Cited
US5814783A Cited
US6085183A Cited
US5879845A Cited
US6097433A Cited
US5818583A Cited
US5956495A Cited
US6033814A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2005-10-07 2006-04-08 2006-10-08 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2009-10-07 2010-04-08 2010-10-08 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2013-10-07 2014-04-08 2014-10-08 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag