Patent US6324241B1 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6324241B1
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for CT reconstruction
Assignee: GE Medical Systems Global Technology Co LLC
•
Filing: 1999-12-30
•
Granted: 2001-11-27
•
Expires: 2019-12-30
Abstract
Abstract In one embodiment, the present invention is a method for reconstructing a scanned CT image that includes steps of: acquiring projection data of an object utilizing a flat-panel detector; and filtering and backprojecting the projection data, without radially interpolating, to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the object. This embodiment provides direct fan-parallel, three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomographic images without loss of resolution associated with radial interpolation, while retaining imaging quality and backprojection speed gains associated with parallel reconstruction.
Inventors
- 👤 Guy M. Besson
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 04:42
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T12/00; G06T12/10; A; A61; A61B; A61B6/00; A61B6/02; A61B6/027; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S378/00; Y10S378/901
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
46 words
A method for reconstructing a scanned CT image comprising the steps of: acquiring projection data of an object utilizing a flat-panel detector having a plurality of detector cells; and filtering and backprojecting the projection data, without radially interpolating, to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the object.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
46 words
A method for reconstructing a scanned CT image comprising the steps of: acquiring projection data of an object utilizing a flat-panel detector having a plurality of detector cells; and filtering and backprojecting the projection data, without radially interpolating, to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the object.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
310 words
A method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein filtering and backprojecting the projection data comprises the step of discretely reconstructing the image as an approximation to a continuous weighted-convolution backprojection written as: f ( r , φ ) = 1 4 π 2 S 2 ∫ 0 2 π 1 G ( ν ~ ) 2 { Lim ɛ → 0 ∫ ν inf ν sup f ɛ ( ν - ν ~ ) H 2 ( ν - ν ~ ) × J ( ν ) E ( ν ) × p ( β , ν ) ν } β where: r, φ, and θ are polar coordinates in a polar coordinate system; f(r,φ) is a polar representation of an x-ray attenuation coefficient distribution to be reconstructed; ν is a detector cell coordinate on a straight line defined by an intersection of an imaging plane and a plane defined by the flat panel detector; β is an angle from a y-axis to a radiation source; p(β,ν) is a representation of a radon transform of f , which itself is a Cartesian representation of an x-ray attenuation distribution to be reconstructed; S is a distance from a radiation source to an isocenter; ν sup is a maximum detector cell coordinate on the flat panel detector; ν inf is a minimum detector cell coordinate; H(ν−{tilde over (ν)}) and F ε (ν−{tilde over (ν)}) are convolution kernels; η({tilde over (ν)}) is a fan angle for a ray passing through a voxel being reconstructed, and {tilde over (ν)} is a cell index for the ray; E(ν) is a preconvolution weight that is a function of detector cell position ν; G({tilde over (ν)}) is a post convolution weighting; and J(ν) is a Jacobian function.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method in accordance with claim 2 wherein the pre-convolution weights are independent of an image point described by (r,φ).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
127 words
A method in accordance with claim 2 , wherein: sin [ η ( ν ) ] - sin [ η ( ν ~ ) ] = { η ′ ( ν ) cos [ η ( ν ) ] η ′ ( ν ~ ) cos [ η ( ν ~ ) ] η ′ ( 0 ) η ′ ( ν - ν ′ ) cos [ η ( ν - ν ~ ) ] } 1 / 2 sin [ η ( ν - ν ~ ) ] ; where η(ν) is a fan angle as a function of detector cell coordinate ν.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
43 words
A method in accordance with claim 2 , wherein acquiring projection data of an object utilizing a flat-panel detector comprises the step of acquiring projection data of the object utilizing a cone beam of radiation from a radiation source having a circular trajectory.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method in accordance with claim 5 wherein the detector is a multi-row detector and further comprising the step of rebinning data on a row-by-row basis.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
42 words
A method in accordance with claim 2 wherein acquiring projection data of an object utilizing a flat-panel detector comprises the step of acquiring projection data of the object utilizing a cone beam of radiation from a radiation source having a helical trajectory.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
67 words
A method in accordance with claim 7 wherein the detector is a multi-row detector and further comprising the steps of weighting the projection data to account for individual ray cone-angles, and using an average cone angle of a fan-parallel projection equal to a cone angle for a ray at η=0 to determine dβ′ in a tilted plane, where dβ′ is a source rotation in the tilted plane.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
60 words
A CT imaging system having a flat panel radiation detector and a radiation source, the flat panel radiation detector having a plurality of detector cells, and said imaging system being configured to: acquire projection data of an object utilizing the flat-panel detector; and filter and backproject the projection data, without radially interpolating, to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the object.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
60 words
A CT imaging system having a flat panel radiation detector and a radiation source, the flat panel radiation detector having a plurality of detector cells, and said imaging system being configured to: acquire projection data of an object utilizing the flat-panel detector; and filter and backproject the projection data, without radially interpolating, to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the object.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
314 words
A CT imaging system in accordance with claim 9 , wherein said system being configured to filter and backproject the projection data comprises said system being configured to reconstruct the image as a weighted-convolution backprojection written as: f ( r , φ ) = 1 4 π 2 S 2 ∫ 0 2 π 1 G ( ν ~ ) 2 { Lim ɛ → 0 ∫ ν inf ν sup f ɛ ( ν - ν ~ ) H 2 ( ν - ν ~ ) × J ( ν ) E ( ν ) × p ( β , ν ) ν } β where: r, φ, and θ are polar coordinates in a polar coordinate system; f(r,φ) is a polar representation of an x-ray attenuation coefficient distribution to be reconstructed; ν is a detector cell coordinate on a straight line defined by an intersection of an imaging plane and a plane defined by the flat panel detector; β is an angle from a y-axis to a radiation source; p(β,ν) is a representation of a radon transform of f , which itself is a Cartesian representation of an x-ray attenuation distribution to be reconstructed; S is a distance from a radiation source to an isocenter; ν sup is a maximum detector cell coordinate on the flat panel detector; ν inf is a minimum detector cell coordinate; H(ν−{tilde over (ν)}) and F ε (ν−{tilde over (ν)}) are convolution kernels; η({tilde over (ν)}) is a fan angle for a ray passing through a voxel being reconstructed, and {tilde over (ν)} is a cell index for the ray; E(ν) is a preconvolution weight that is a function of detector cell position ν; G({tilde over (ν)}) is a post convolution weighting; and J(ν) is a Jacobian function.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
A CT imaging system in accordance with claim 10 wherein the pre-convolution weights are independent of an image point described by (r,φ).
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
129 words
A CT imaging system in accordance with claim 10 , wherein: sin [ η ( ν ) ] - sin [ η ( ν ~ ) ] = { η ′ ( ν ) cos [ η ( ν ) ] η ′ ( ν ~ ) cos [ η ( ν ~ ) ] η ′ ( 0 ) η ′ ( ν - ν ′ ) cos [ η ( ν - ν ~ ) ] } 1 / 2 sin [ η ( ν - ν ~ ) ] ; where η is a fan angle associated with a detector cell indexed by ν.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
52 words
A CT imaging system in accordance with claim 10 , wherein said system being configured to acquire projection data of an object utilizing a flat-panel detector comprises said system being configured to acquire projection data of the object utilizing a cone beam of radiation from the radiation source in a circular trajectory.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
31 words
A CT imaging system in accordance with claim 13 wherein the radiation detector is a multi-row detector, the CT imaging system further being configured to rebin data on a row-by-row basis.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
52 words
A CT imaging system in accordance with claim 10 wherein said imaging system being configured to acquire projection data of an object utilizing a flat-panel detector comprises said system being configured to acquire projection data of the object utilizing a cone beam of radiation from the radiation source in a helical trajectory.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
73 words
A CT imaging system in accordance with claim 15 wherein the radiation detector is a multi-row detector and said imaging system is further configured to weight the projection data to account for individual ray cone-angles, and and use an average cone angle of a fan-parallel projection equal to a cone angle for a ray at η=0 to determine dβ′ in a tilted plane, where dβ′ is a source rotation in the tilted plane.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4549265A
Cited
US4852132A
Cited
US5999587A
Cited
US6075836A
Cited
US6173032B1
Cited
US6233308B1
Cited
US6246742B1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2004-11-26 | 2005-05-28 | 2005-11-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2008-11-26 | 2009-05-28 | 2009-11-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2012-11-26 | 2013-05-28 | 2013-11-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |