US6236907B1
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for creating agricultural decision and application maps for automated agricultural machines
Assignee: AG Chem Equipment Co Inc
•
Filing: 1996-12-30
•
Granted: 2001-05-22
•
Expires: 2016-12-30
Abstract
Abstract A system for creating application maps for controlling a dispensing apparatus based upon field data, the system including a system for maintaining field data. The field data may be georeferenced relative to geographic coordinates of the location of the field data. Application rate equations for correlating field data relative to desired output may be selectively defined based upon selected field data and desired output to produce application maps for a particular field. A processor is designed to selectively access field data for a particular field to execute application rate equations for the field data to produce an application map which may be used for variable rate application of material by dispensing apparatus based upon the selected field data and the desired output.
Inventors
- 👤 Joseph I. Hauwiller
- 👤 Youxuan Jin
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 12:13
CPC Classifications
A; A01; A01B; A01B79/00; A01B79/005
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 42
Claim 1
Independent Claim
82 words
A system for creating application maps for use in a controller, the system comprising: a data storage system for storing geographic data, attribute data, and recommendation equations, wherein the attribute data comprises crop selling price data and crop input cost data; and a processor operably coupled to the data storage system which creates application maps by retrieving a recommendation equation, selected geographic data and the attribute data, and processing the geographic data and attribute data as a function of a recommendation equation.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
82 words
A system for creating application maps for use in a controller, the system comprising: a data storage system for storing geographic data, attribute data, and recommendation equations, wherein the attribute data comprises crop selling price data and crop input cost data; and a processor operably coupled to the data storage system which creates application maps by retrieving a recommendation equation, selected geographic data and the attribute data, and processing the geographic data and attribute data as a function of a recommendation equation.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
11 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the recommendation equations are pre-defined.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
12 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the recommendation equations are user specific.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
27 words
The system of claim 3 and further comprising a user interface having a display and an input device allowing a user to define the desired recommendation equation.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the data storage system further stores commercial product information, including a composition of the commercial product.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
42 words
The system of claim 5 wherein the processor further comprises a formulation instruction assembly for determining the dispensing rate by field location of a commercial product based on the desired dispensing rates by field location of a component of the commercial product.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
38 words
The system of claim 6 wherein the formulation instruction assembly provides instructions for correlating the dispensing rates by location of multiple commercial products based on the desired dispensing rates by location of the components of the commercial products.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
38 words
The system of claim 6 wherein the formulation instruction assembly determines the dispensing rate by field location of a commercial product based on the desired dispensing rate by location of a plurality of components of a commercial product.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
34 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the recommendation equation is not pre-compiled by the system, and the system further comprises: an interpreter module for compiling a desired recommendation equation for execution by the processor.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
26 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the geographic data comprises spatial field data which is georeferenced relative to the geographic coordinates to which the data relates.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
13 words
The system of claim 10 wherein the geographic coordinates are longitude and latitude.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
24 words
The system of claim 10 wherein the data storage system comprises a spatial database for storing the spatial field data based on data type.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
15 words
The system of claim 12 wherein the spatial field data is converted to quadcode format.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
35 words
The system of claim 13 wherein the data storage system comprises a database management system coupled to the spatial database for correlating spatial field data relative to a particular field based on field boundary data.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
40 words
The system of claim 12 wherein spatial field data is maintained independently of a field and the spatial field data is associated with a particular field based on the geographic coordinates of the spatial field data and field boundary data.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of claim 1 wherein geographic data comprises recorded spread data of a material to a field by location.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
12 words
The system of claim 1 wherein geographic data comprises yield monitor data.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
12 words
The system of claim 1 wherein attribute data further comprises weather data.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
19 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the recommendation equations define a relationship between field productivity potential and nutrient levels.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
15 words
The system of claim 19 wherein the field productivity potential is variable across the field.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
21 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the recommendation equations define a relationship between application rates of a material and desired yield.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
14 words
The system of claim 21 wherein the desired yield is constant throughout the field.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
14 words
The system of claim 21 wherein the desired yield is variable across the field.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
34 words
The system of claim 21 and further comprising a user interface system allowing a user to create a yield map defining areas of different yield goals based on variable soil characteristics of the field.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
41 words
The system of claim 24 wherein the user interface system comprises: a display device for displaying a yield map; and an input device allowing a user to select boundary areas and to assign specific yield goals to the selected boundary areas.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
31 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the processor processes the attribute data as a function of a recommendation equation to create an application map based on a desired cost of application.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
18 words
The system of claim 26 wherein the application map is created based on a desired rate of return.
Claim 29
Independent Claim
100 words
A method for creating a product application map for variable rate application of material to a field, the method comprising: collecting geographic data of a field; storing the geographic data by location in a data storage system; storing attribute data of the field in the data storage system, wherein the attribute data comprises farm input costs and crop selling price; storing recommendation equations in the data storage system; selecting a recommendation equation; selecting certain geographic data and the attribute data; and creating a product application map based on the selected geographic data, the attribute data, and the selected recommendation equation.
Claim 30
Independent Claim
100 words
A method for creating a product application map for variable rate application of material to a field, the method comprising: collecting geographic data of a field; storing the geographic data by location in a data storage system; storing attribute data of the field in the data storage system, wherein the attribute data comprises farm input costs and crop selling price; storing recommendation equations in the data storage system; selecting a recommendation equation; selecting certain geographic data and the attribute data; and creating a product application map based on the selected geographic data, the attribute data, and the selected recommendation equation.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 28 and further comprising printing the product application map.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 28 wherein storing the geographic data by location comprises storing the geographic data in a spatial database based on data type.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 30 wherein storing the geographic data by location further comprises utilizing a database management system to correlate the spatial field data to a particular field based on field boundary data.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 28 wherein creating the product application map comprises processing the selected geographic data as a function of the recommendation equation to achieve a desired yield.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 32 wherein creating the product application map comprises processing the selected attribute data as a function of the recommendation equation to achieve a desired rate of return.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 28 wherein creating the product application map further comprises allowing a user to override the selected recommendation equation.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 28 wherein the geographic data further comprises spread rate data relating to material applied to a field.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
78 words
A geographic information system for use in site specific farming applications, the geographic information system comprising: a data storage system; farm input cost data and crop selling price data stored in the data storage system; and an expert system for processing the farm input cost data and crop selling price data based on a user defined relationship between the farm input cost and crop selling price data and a desired output to produce a site specific application map.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
78 words
A geographic information system for use in site specific farming applications, the geographic information system comprising: a data storage system; farm input cost data and crop selling price data stored in the data storage system; and an expert system for processing the farm input cost data and crop selling price data based on a user defined relationship between the farm input cost and crop selling price data and a desired output to produce a site specific application map.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
20 words
The geographic information system of claim 36 and further comprising a user interface system operably coupled to the expert system.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
34 words
The geographic information system of claim 37 wherein the relationship between the farm input cost and selling price data and the desired output can be altered by a user using the user interface system.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
17 words
The geographic information system of claim 36 wherein the desired output comprises a desired rate of return.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US1005822A
Cited
US1526642A
Cited
US2596390A
Cited
US2684865A
Cited
US2759762A
Cited
US2699967A
Cited
US2757044A
Cited
US2857863A
Cited
US2772921A
Cited
US3044661A
Cited
US3143295A
Cited
US3270962A
Cited
US3233832A
Cited
US3301487A
Cited
US3419221A
Cited
US3330070A
Cited
US3344993A
Cited
US3366281A
Cited
US3463397A
Cited
US3511411A
Cited
US3584788A
Cited
US3550866A
Cited
US3679098A
Cited
US3589614A
Cited
US3585827A
Cited
US3770198A
Cited
US3792709A
Cited
US3815830A
Cited
US3782634A
Cited
US3855953A
Cited
US4023020A
Cited
US3877645A
Cited
US3976231A
Cited
US3945332A
Cited
US3978324A
Cited
US4015366A
Cited
US4093107A
Cited
US4014271A
Cited
US4052003A
Cited
US4116138A
Cited
US4277022A
Cited
US4465211A
Cited
US4176395A
Cited
US4212428A
Cited
US4220998A
Cited
US4209131A
Cited
US4358054A
Cited
US4197995A
Cited
US4357670A
Cited
US4229799A
Cited
US4350293A
Cited
US4252274A
Cited
US4462079A
Cited
US4351535A
Cited
US4467961A
Cited
US4392611A
Cited
US4629164A
Cited
US4553702A
Cited
US4588127A
Cited
US4637547A
Cited
US4530463A
Cited
US4456176A
Cited
US4518118A
Cited
US4523280A
Cited
US4677787A
Cited
US4630773A
Cited
US4714196A
Cited
US4545396A
Cited
US4865253A
Cited
US4805089A
Cited
US4721245A
Cited
US4755942A
Cited
US4817870A
Cited
US4669662A
Cited
US4813604A
Cited
US4725004A
Cited
US4723710A
Cited
US4930702A
Cited
US4826083A
Cited
US5014914A
Cited
US4805088A
Cited
US4798325A
Cited
US4823268A
Cited
US4803626A
Cited
US4925096A
Cited
US4932232A
Cited
US4886208A
Cited
US4895303A
Cited
US4878614A
Cited
US5184420A
Cited
US5130925A
Cited
US5077653A
Cited
US4992942A
Cited
US5314120A
Cited
US5021939A
Cited
US5050771A
Cited
US4967957A
Cited
US5016817A
Cited
US4986782A
Cited
US5033397A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2004-05-21 | 2004-11-20 | 2005-05-22 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2008-05-21 | 2008-11-20 | 2009-05-22 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2012-05-21 | 2012-11-20 | 2013-05-22 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |