Patent US6178259B1 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6178259B1
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of compensating for pixel histogram distortion in an object recognition system
Assignee: Unisys Corp
•
Filing: 1998-04-17
•
Granted: 2001-01-23
•
Expires: 2018-04-17
Abstract
Abstract A method of recognizing an unknown object includes the following steps: receiving from a camera, a first image of the unknown object which is comprised of an array of pixels of multiple magnitudes that lie within a certain range; generating a second image from the first image by scaling the pixel magnitudes in the first image such that differences in the scaled pixel magnitudes are increased and the average pixel magnitude lies near the middle of the pixel range; and, determining the width of the unknown object by detecting an area in the second image where the pixel magnitudes exceed a certain threshold level. Based on that width, a third image is generated from the second image, by adjusting the magnification of the second image such that it has a predetermined standard width; and the unknown object is identified if a correlation between the third image and a reference exceeds a threshold.
Inventors
- 👤 Craig Weaver Harris
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 12:28
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06V; G06V40/00; G06V40/10; G06V40/16; G06V40/161; G06V10/00; G06V10/20; G06V10/32
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
170 words
A method of recognizing an unknown object, including the steps of: receiving from a camera, a first image of said unknown object which is comprised of an array of pixels of several different magnitudes; generating a second image, after said first image is received, by scaling the pixel magnitudes in said first image such that a histogram of the pixels in said second image has a larger standard deviation than a histogram of the pixels in said first image; detecting an area in said second image where the pixel magnitudes exceed a certain minimum; generating a third image, after said second image is generated, by decreasing the magnification of said second image if said area has a width which exceeds a predetermined standard, and increasing the magnification of said second image if said area has a width which is less then said predetermined standard; and, identifying said unknown object as a particular object if a correlation between said third image and an image of said particular object exceeds a threshold.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
170 words
A method of recognizing an unknown object, including the steps of: receiving from a camera, a first image of said unknown object which is comprised of an array of pixels of several different magnitudes; generating a second image, after said first image is received, by scaling the pixel magnitudes in said first image such that a histogram of the pixels in said second image has a larger standard deviation than a histogram of the pixels in said first image; detecting an area in said second image where the pixel magnitudes exceed a certain minimum; generating a third image, after said second image is generated, by decreasing the magnification of said second image if said area has a width which exceeds a predetermined standard, and increasing the magnification of said second image if said area has a width which is less then said predetermined standard; and, identifying said unknown object as a particular object if a correlation between said third image and an image of said particular object exceeds a threshold.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
76 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said scaling operation is of the form P 2 =V SD (P 1 −V A ), where P 1 is the magnitude of a pixel in the first image; P 2 is the magnitude of a scaled pixel in the second image which corresponds to the pixel P 1 ; V SD is a parameter greater than one; and V A is a parameter greater or equal to zero.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method according to claim 2 and further including the steps of measuring the standard deviation of the pixels in said first image, and increasing the parameter V SD as the measured standard deviation decreases.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method according to claim 2 and further including the steps of measuring the average value of the pixels in said first image, and increasing the parameter V A as the measured average value increases.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method according to claim 2 and further including the step of storing control signals in a memory which represent particular values of said parameters for use in identifying said particular object.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method according to claim 2 wherein said parameters V SD and V A are predetermined and independent of said pixels in said first image.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
64 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said scaling operation is of the form P 2 =V SD P 1 , where P 1 is the magnitude of a pixel in the first image; P 2 is the magnitude of a scaled pixel in the second image which corresponds to the pixel P 1 ; and V SD is a parameter greater than one.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
76 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said scaling operation is of the form P 2 =V SD P 1 −V A , where P 1 is the magnitude of a pixel in the first image; P 2 is the magnitude of a scaled pixel in the second image which corresponds to the pixel P 1 ; V SD is a parameter greater than one; and V A is a parameter greater or equal to zero.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said unknown object is the face of a person who is to be identified.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
18 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said camera generates said first image in the infrared frequency spectrum.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said camera generates said first image in the visible light frequency spectrum.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4651199A
Cited
US4959870A
Cited
US5163094A
Cited
US5748802A
Cited
US5835616A
Cited
US5497430A
Cited
US5693940A
Cited
US5991429A
Cited
US5822453A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2004-01-23 | 2004-07-24 | 2005-01-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2008-01-23 | 2008-07-24 | 2009-01-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2012-01-23 | 2012-07-24 | 2013-01-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |