← Back to Patent Explorer
US6167380A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

System and method for allocating manufactured products to sellers

Assignee: Blue Yonder Group Inc
•
Filing: 1997-02-18
•
Granted: 2000-12-26
•
Expires: 2017-02-18
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A software system is provided for managing available to promise (ATP) and making promises to fulfill customer requests. The software system includes a plurality of generic product models (600) each representing a generic product. Each generic product model (600) specifies one component of a plurality of possible components. A plurality of specific product models (602) each represent a specific product and each specify all components of the specific product. Each component specified by each specific product model (602) is specified by one of the generic product models (600) such that each specific product model (602) is related to a subset of the generic product models (600). A customer request matching a specific product then can be fulfilled by available-to-promise of the specific product or by available-to-promise of all related generic products. In addition, an organization in a seller hierarchy can retain product and designate first-come-first-served product. The organization also can define an ATP horizon to specify when forecasted product is actually available. Further, the organization can use an automatic allocation policy to allocate to members, and some forecast entries can be designated zero-ATP entries.

Inventors

  • 👤 Brian M. Kennedy
  • 👤 Christopher D. Burchett

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-28 04:36
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/06; G06Q10/063; G06Q10/0631; G06Q10/06315; G06Q10/08; G06Q10/087; G06Q10/0872; G06Q10/08726; G06Q10/0874; G06Q10/08744; G06Q30/00; G06Q30/02; G06Q30/0201; G06Q30/0202; Y; Y02; Y02P; Y02P90/00; Y02P90/80

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 30
Claim 1
Independent Claim 216 words
A system operating on a computer for allowing an organization to allocate manufactured products among sellers, comprising: a seller model stored in a memory of the computer and representing sellers that sell at least one product, the seller model forecasting for at least one product and defining commitment levels for creating at least one forecast request value; at least one supplier model stored in the memory, the supplier model receiving the forecast request value and providing at least one supplier promise value to the seller model, the supplier promise value being based on the forecast request value; and at least one customer model stored in the memory, the customer model providing a customer order value to the seller model and receiving an actual customer promise value; a forecast model for the product that is stored in the memory and maintains an allocation value, a forecast request value, and a supplier promise value, the allocation value representing the sum of promises from different suppliers plus any promises to customers; wherein the system displays allocation data to make product allocation available to the sellers; and wherein the seller model comprises a hierarchy of sellers, the forecast data representing an aggregate of forecasts from members of the hierarchy, the allocation data being distributed as sub-allocation data to the members.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 216 words
A system operating on a computer for allowing an organization to allocate manufactured products among sellers, comprising: a seller model stored in a memory of the computer and representing sellers that sell at least one product, the seller model forecasting for at least one product and defining commitment levels for creating at least one forecast request value; at least one supplier model stored in the memory, the supplier model receiving the forecast request value and providing at least one supplier promise value to the seller model, the supplier promise value being based on the forecast request value; and at least one customer model stored in the memory, the customer model providing a customer order value to the seller model and receiving an actual customer promise value; a forecast model for the product that is stored in the memory and maintains an allocation value, a forecast request value, and a supplier promise value, the allocation value representing the sum of promises from different suppliers plus any promises to customers; wherein the system displays allocation data to make product allocation available to the sellers; and wherein the seller model comprises a hierarchy of sellers, the forecast data representing an aggregate of forecasts from members of the hierarchy, the allocation data being distributed as sub-allocation data to the members.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 22 words
The system of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the products are designated as retained product not available for promising.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 37 words
The system of claim 1, wherein an automatic allocation policy allows the organization to designate forecast entry of a member as a zero-available-to-promise entry to make the available-to-promise product at the member zero for that forecast entry.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 20 words
The system of claim 1, wherein an automatic allocation policy for distributing the allocation data is a first-come-first-served allocation policy.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 16 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the automatic allocation policy is a per allocated allocation policy.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 16 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the automatic allocation policy is a per committed allocation policy.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 16 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the automatic allocation policy is a member rank allocation policy.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 16 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the automatic allocation policy is a fixed split allocation policy.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 117 words
The system of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of generic product models stored in the memory and each representing a generic product, each generic product model specifying one component of a plurality of possible components; a plurality of specific product models stored in the memory and each representing a specific product, each specific product model specifying all components of the specific product; wherein each component specified by each specific product model is specified by one of the generic product models, each specific product model being related to a subset of the generic product models; and wherein the system provides a customer promise value for a specific product according to a determined available-to-promise of related generic products.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 41 words
The system of claim 9, wherein the generic product models and specific product models are repeated across at least a portion of a seller hierarchy, there being organization-member relationships between generic products and between specific products in addition to generic-specific relationships.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 20 words
The system of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of said allocation value is distributed on a first-come-first-served basis.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 33 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the forecast model has an associated forecast period, and wherein an available-to-promise (ATP) of said forecast data has an associated available-to-promise period shorter than the forecast period.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 23 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the system is further operable to distribute the allocation data in accordance with an automatic allocation policy.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 44 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the forecast model adjusts the forecast request value and the supplier promise value in response to the customer order value, the allocation value remaining the same, but the forecast request value and the supplier promise value being reduced.
Claim 16
Independent Claim 215 words
A method operating on a computer for allowing an organization to allocate manufactured products among sellers, comprising: using a seller model stored in a memory of the computer to represent sellers that sell at least one product, the seller model forecasting for at least one product and defining commitment levels for creating at least one forecast request value; using at least one supplier model stored in the memory to receive the forecast request value and to provide at least one supplier promise value to the seller model, the supplier promise value being based on the forecast request value; and using at least one customer model stored in the memory to provide a customer order value to the seller model and to receive an actual customer promise value; using a forecast model for the product that is stored in the memory to maintain an allocation value, a forecast request value, and a supplier promise value, the allocation value representing the sum of promises from different suppliers plus any promises to customers; displaying allocation data to make product allocation available to the sellers; and wherein the seller model comprises a hierarchy of sellers, the forecast data representing an aggregate of forecasts from members of the hierarchy, the allocation data being distributed as sub-allocation data to the members.
Claim 17
Independent Claim 215 words
A method operating on a computer for allowing an organization to allocate manufactured products among sellers, comprising: using a seller model stored in a memory of the computer to represent sellers that sell at least one product, the seller model forecasting for at least one product and defining commitment levels for creating at least one forecast request value; using at least one supplier model stored in the memory to receive the forecast request value and to provide at least one supplier promise value to the seller model, the supplier promise value being based on the forecast request value; and using at least one customer model stored in the memory to provide a customer order value to the seller model and to receive an actual customer promise value; using a forecast model for the product that is stored in the memory to maintain an allocation value, a forecast request value, and a supplier promise value, the allocation value representing the sum of promises from different suppliers plus any promises to customers; displaying allocation data to make product allocation available to the sellers; and wherein the seller model comprises a hierarchy of sellers, the forecast data representing an aggregate of forecasts from members of the hierarchy, the allocation data being distributed as sub-allocation data to the members.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 15, wherein at least a portion of the products are designated as retained product not available for promising.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method of claim 15, wherein the automatic allocation policy for distributing the allocation data allows an organization to designate forecast entry of a member as a zero-available-to-promise entry to make the available-to-promise product at the member zero for that forecast entry.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 15, wherein automatic allocation policy for distributing the allocation data is a first-come-first-served allocation policy.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 15, wherein an automatic allocation policy for distributing the allocation data is a per allocated allocation policy.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 15, wherein an automatic allocation policy for distributing the allocation data is a per committed allocation policy.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 15, wherein an automatic allocation policy for distributing the allocation data is a member rank allocation policy.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 15, wherein an automatic allocation policy for distributing the allocation data is a fixed split allocation policy.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 124 words
The method of claim 15, further comprising: using a plurality of generic product models stored in the memory to represent generic products, each generic product model representing a particular generic product and specifying one component of a plurality of possible components; using a plurality of specific product models stored in the memory to represent specific products, each specific product model representing a particular specific product and specifying all components of the specific product; wherein each component specified by each specific product model is specified by one of the generic product models, each specific product model being related to a subset of the generic product models; and providing a customer promise value for a specific product according to a determined available-to-promise of related generic products.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 41 words
The method of claim 23, wherein the generic product models and specific product models are repeated across at least a portion of a seller hierarchy, there being organization-member relationships between generic products and between specific products in addition to generic-specific relationships.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 15, wherein at least a portion of said allocation value is distributed on a first-come-first-served basis.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 33 words
The method of claim 15, wherein the forecast model has an associated forecast period, and wherein an available-to-promise (ATP) of said forecast data has an associated available-to-promise period shorter than the forecast period.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 15, further comprising distributing the allocation data in accordance with an automatic allocation policy.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method of claim 15, further comprising using the forecast model to adjust the forecast request value and the supplier promise value in response to the customer order value, the allocation value remaining the same, but the forecast request value and the supplier promise value being reduced.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2003-12-26 2004-06-26 2004-12-26 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2007-12-26 2008-06-26 2008-12-26 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2011-12-26 2012-06-26 2012-12-26 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag