Patent US6161015A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6161015A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for improving communication coverage in multi-cell communication systems using location information
Assignee: Google Technology Holdings LLC
•
Filing: 1998-05-28
•
Granted: 2000-12-12
•
Expires: 2018-05-28
Abstract
Abstract The present invention provides a method for improving the communication coverage in a multi-cell communication system (100) which employs neighbor cell lists. A cell site (114) provides a communication unit (128) within its cell (112) with communication and a neighbor cell list. The neighbor cell list (200) informs the communication unit of other cells which are possible hand-off targets. When the fixed network equipment (FNE) detects that a particular communication unit (128) has entered another cell and/or needs to hand-off its communication to another cell site but has been denied, the cell site (114) sends the communication unit the neighbor cell list related to the new cell. With a new neighbor cell list (300), the communication unit (128) can now attempt to maintain its communication by handing-off to cells unknown before. In this manner the effective communication coverage of the system is improved.
Inventors
- 👤 Mark A. Birchler
- 👤 Lawrence J. Marturano
- 👤 Mark J. Marsan
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 10:14
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04W; H04W36/00; H04W36/24; H04W36/32; H04W36/322; H04W64/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
214 words
In a multi-cell communication system, a method of improving communication coverage, comprising: providing a first neighbor cell list to a communication unit wherein the communication unit is engaged in a comnmunication on a channel in a first cell; determining periodically a geographical location of the communication unit to a greater specificity than that of a cell site service coverage area; determining that the first neighbor cell list no longer relates to a current geographical location of the communication unit that is determined to a greater specificity than that of a cell site service coverage area; repeatedly determining that the communication unit needs to hand-off from the channel in the first cell to a channel in a second cell; repeatedly denying the communication unit access to the channel in the second cell to produce a quantity of hand-off denials; and providing the communication unit with a second neighbor cell list related to the current geographical location of the communication unit, wherein the step of providing the communication unit with a second neighbor cell list comprises the step of providing the communication unit with a second neighbor cell list when the first neighbor cell list no longer relates to a current geographical location of the communication unit and the quantity of hand-off denials reaches a threshold.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
214 words
In a multi-cell communication system, a method of improving communication coverage, comprising: providing a first neighbor cell list to a communication unit wherein the communication unit is engaged in a comnmunication on a channel in a first cell; determining periodically a geographical location of the communication unit to a greater specificity than that of a cell site service coverage area; determining that the first neighbor cell list no longer relates to a current geographical location of the communication unit that is determined to a greater specificity than that of a cell site service coverage area; repeatedly determining that the communication unit needs to hand-off from the channel in the first cell to a channel in a second cell; repeatedly denying the communication unit access to the channel in the second cell to produce a quantity of hand-off denials; and providing the communication unit with a second neighbor cell list related to the current geographical location of the communication unit, wherein the step of providing the communication unit with a second neighbor cell list comprises the step of providing the communication unit with a second neighbor cell list when the first neighbor cell list no longer relates to a current geographical location of the communication unit and the quantity of hand-off denials reaches a threshold.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining periodically a geographical location of the communication unit comprises the step of receiving geo-coordinates from the communication unit.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining periodically a geographical location of the communication unit further comprises the step of determining a distance between the communication unit and at least three cell site locations.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the first neighbor cell list no longer relates to a current location of the communication unit further comprises the step of receiving a neighbor cell list update request from the communication unit.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 4, wherein the neighbor cell list update request includes a current geographical location of the communication unit.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
65 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of providing the communication unit with a second neighbor cell list comprises the step of providing the communication unit with a second neighbor cell list when the first neighbor cell list no longer relates to a current geographical location of the communication unit and a neighbor cell list update request has been received from the comnmunication unit.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
141 words
In a multi-cell communication system having a plurality of communication units, a method of improving communication coverage, comprising the steps performed in at least one of the plurality of communication units: receiving a first neighbor cell list; requesting a hand-off from a serving cell to another cell; receiving a denial to hand-off to another cell; determining a new neighbor cell list is needed; requesting a neighbor cell list update; and receiving a second neighbor cell list; wherein the step of requesting a hand-off to another cell comprises the step of repeatedly requesting to be handed-off; wherein the step of receiving a denial to hand-off to another cell comprises the step of repeatedly receiving denials to hand-off producing a quantity of hand-off denials; and wherein the step of determining comprises the step of reaching a threshold in the quantity of hand-off denials.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
141 words
In a multi-cell communication system having a plurality of communication units, a method of improving communication coverage, comprising the steps performed in at least one of the plurality of communication units: receiving a first neighbor cell list; requesting a hand-off from a serving cell to another cell; receiving a denial to hand-off to another cell; determining a new neighbor cell list is needed; requesting a neighbor cell list update; and receiving a second neighbor cell list; wherein the step of requesting a hand-off to another cell comprises the step of repeatedly requesting to be handed-off; wherein the step of receiving a denial to hand-off to another cell comprises the step of repeatedly receiving denials to hand-off producing a quantity of hand-off denials; and wherein the step of determining comprises the step of reaching a threshold in the quantity of hand-off denials.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 7, wherein the step of determining comprises comparing signal quality measurements of the serving cell and at least one other cell.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5394158A
Cited
US5235633A
Cited
US5267261A
Cited
US5327575A
Cited
US5574968A
Cited
US5551058A
Cited
US5634192A
Cited
US5613205A
Cited
US5893033A
Cited
US5568153A
Cited
US5857155A
Cited
US5940761A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2003-12-12 | 2004-06-12 | 2004-12-12 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2007-12-12 | 2008-06-12 | 2008-12-12 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2011-12-12 | 2012-06-12 | 2012-12-12 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |