§
Luxuse
Patent Intelligence
Sign In
Patent US6072894A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US6072894A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Biometric face recognition for applicant screening

Assignee: Rateze Remote Mgmt LLC
•
Filing: 1997-10-17
•
Granted: 2000-06-06
•
Expires: 2017-10-17
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Biometric facial comparison is deployed in a novel way to improve screening of applicants across multiple branch locations, preventing common forms of application fraud. The biometric facial comparison software is located at a computing location (20), readily accessible from a first applicant screening branch (30) and a subsequent applicant screening branch (40), by means of a communication network (10). The biometric facial screening is fast, affordable, nonintrusive, and takes place in person in the branch. Even if false identification documents are used, perpetrators will be automatically detected as they attempt to go from branch to branch making bogus transactions. Patterns of fraudulent behavior are detected even if no prior transaction is yet known to be fraudulent, and even if the applicant's face does not match the face of any known perpetrator. Although the first fraudulent transaction will generally not be immediately detected, detection will occur before any subsequent transaction are processed or approved.

Inventors

  • 👤 John H. Payne

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-07 10:49
CPC Classifications
G; G07; G07C; G07C9/00; G07C9/30; G07C9/32; G07C9/37

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim 224 words
A method of screening applicants comprising the steps of: (a) receiving a request to apply from an applicant, said applicant appearing in person at an applicant screening branch; (b) capturing a digital facial image of said applicant; (c) converting without dithering said digital facial image of said applicant to a bilevel digital facial image of said applicant; (d) transmitting said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant, along with data identifying said request to apply, from said applicant screening branch to a computing location; (e) comparing, using computer based face recognition at said computing location, said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant with the bilevel digital facial images of prior applicants; (f) examining, using computer accessible databases, a history of prior requests to apply from applicants whose bilevel digital facial images closely resemble said applicant, to detect behavior indicative of application fraud; (g) updating, automatically, using computer accessible databases, said history of prior requests to apply, to include said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant, along with said data identifying said request to apply; (h) providing notification of the results of the examination for application fraud, to encourage further scrutiny and a possible rejection of said request to apply, as appropriate; (i) repeating all the above steps, a through h, for any subsequent request to apply at any subsequent applicant screening branch.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 224 words
A method of screening applicants comprising the steps of: (a) receiving a request to apply from an applicant, said applicant appearing in person at an applicant screening branch; (b) capturing a digital facial image of said applicant; (c) converting without dithering said digital facial image of said applicant to a bilevel digital facial image of said applicant; (d) transmitting said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant, along with data identifying said request to apply, from said applicant screening branch to a computing location; (e) comparing, using computer based face recognition at said computing location, said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant with the bilevel digital facial images of prior applicants; (f) examining, using computer accessible databases, a history of prior requests to apply from applicants whose bilevel digital facial images closely resemble said applicant, to detect behavior indicative of application fraud; (g) updating, automatically, using computer accessible databases, said history of prior requests to apply, to include said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant, along with said data identifying said request to apply; (h) providing notification of the results of the examination for application fraud, to encourage further scrutiny and a possible rejection of said request to apply, as appropriate; (i) repeating all the above steps, a through h, for any subsequent request to apply at any subsequent applicant screening branch.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 15 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a digital communication network, is the means of transmission.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the Internet is the means of transmission.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 1 wherein an Internet website, or a plurality of Internet websites, serves as said computing location.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 40 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said applicant screening branch is any branch location of a U.S. bank, credit union, savings and loan, or other U.S. depository institution, capable of receiving said request to apply, in person, from said applicant.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said request to apply is a request to open a new checking account, or a new share draft account.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the updating step occurs at any time before the repeating step and after the transmitting step.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 40 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a computer accessible geographic database is used to limit the examining of said history of prior requests to apply, to examine only the prior requests to apply that originated nearby said applicant screening branch.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said digital facial image of said applicant is also compared to the digital facial images of known perpetrators using said computer based face recognition.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 234 words
A method of screening applicants for check cashing privileges or pay-by-check privileges comprising the steps of: (a) receiving a request for said privileges from an applicant, said applicant appearing in person at an applicant screening branch; (b) capturing a digital facial image of said applicant; (c) converting without dithering said digital facial image of said applicant to a bilevel digital facial image of said applicant; (d) transmitting said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant, along with data identifying said request for said privileges, from said applicant screening branch to a computing location; (e) comparing, using computer based face recognition at said computing location, said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant with the bilevel digital facial images of prior applicants; (f) examining, using computer accessible databases, a history of prior requests to apply from applicants whose bilevel digital facial images closely resemble said applicant, to detect behavior indicative of fraud; (g) updating, automatically, using computer accessible databases, said history of prior requests to apply, to include said digital facial image of said applicant, along with said data identifying said request for said privileges; (h) providing notification of the results of the examination for application fraud, to encourage further scrutiny and a possible rejection of said request for said privileges, as appropriate; (i) repeating all the above steps, a through h, for any subsequent request for said privileges at any subsequent applicant screening branch.
Claim 12
Independent Claim 234 words
A method of screening applicants for check cashing privileges or pay-by-check privileges comprising the steps of: (a) receiving a request for said privileges from an applicant, said applicant appearing in person at an applicant screening branch; (b) capturing a digital facial image of said applicant; (c) converting without dithering said digital facial image of said applicant to a bilevel digital facial image of said applicant; (d) transmitting said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant, along with data identifying said request for said privileges, from said applicant screening branch to a computing location; (e) comparing, using computer based face recognition at said computing location, said bilevel digital facial image of said applicant with the bilevel digital facial images of prior applicants; (f) examining, using computer accessible databases, a history of prior requests to apply from applicants whose bilevel digital facial images closely resemble said applicant, to detect behavior indicative of fraud; (g) updating, automatically, using computer accessible databases, said history of prior requests to apply, to include said digital facial image of said applicant, along with said data identifying said request for said privileges; (h) providing notification of the results of the examination for application fraud, to encourage further scrutiny and a possible rejection of said request for said privileges, as appropriate; (i) repeating all the above steps, a through h, for any subsequent request for said privileges at any subsequent applicant screening branch.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 15 words
The method of claim 10 wherein a digital communication network, is the means of transmission.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the Internet is the means of transmission.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 10 wherein an Internet website, or a plurality of Internet websites, serves as said computing location.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method of claim 10 wherein said applicant screening branch is any branch location of a U.S. bank, credit union, savings and loan, or other U.S. depository institution, capable of receiving said request to for said privileges, in person, from said applicant.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of claim 10 wherein said applicant screening branch is any merchant location or check cashing service location capable of receiving said request for said privileges, in person, from said applicant.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the updating step occurs at any time before the repeating step and after the transmitting step.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method of claim 10 wherein said digital facial image of said applicant is also compared to the digital facial images of known perpetrators using said computer based face recognition.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4052739A Cited
US4910672A Cited
US4995081A Cited
US5563956A Cited
US5224173A Cited
US5561718A Cited
US5329381A Cited
US5331544A Cited
US5748755A Cited
US5592377A Cited
US5442162A Cited
US5469506A Cited
US5864363A Cited
US5761329A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2003-06-06 2003-12-06 2004-06-06 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2007-06-06 2007-12-06 2008-06-06 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2011-06-06 2011-12-06 2012-06-06 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag