Patent US3388045A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4928281A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US3259209A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US6038393A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US6038393A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Software development tool to accept object modeling data from a wide variety of other vendors and filter the format into a format that is able to be stored in OMG compliant UML representation
Assignee: Unisys Corp
•
Filing: 1997-09-22
•
Granted: 2000-03-14
•
Expires: 2017-09-22
Abstract
Abstract A programmed computer system transforms a distinctive representation of a business model into a generic representation format, such as the Unified Modeling Language ("UML") object model. The system also transforms legacy business processes, including legacy applications into UML format. The UML format of the business model and legacy components are stored in a central repository. The system also allows the reverse engineering and reverse transformation of UML models into a distinctive representation of business models and application components. The transformation of business model information into a UML model is achieved by identifying the differences between these models and creating a bidirectional mapping of the differences. The system also allows for selective movement of objects and models between business process models and UML. In other words, a user may select individual objects to be moved between models.
Inventors
- 👤 Sridhar Srinivasa Iyengar
- 👤 James Albert Fontana
- 👤 Norman Roy Smith
- 👤 Brian Edward Pattinson
- 👤 Anthony Reginald Pitchford
- 👤 Mireille Mathilde Staub
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 12:36
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F8/00; G06F8/20
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
172 words
A computer system, including a repository, comprising: a.) first means for transforming a first distinctive representation of business model information into an OMG compliant UML representation of at least a portion of a business model and storing said representation in said repository in the form of a set of object classes, said first means for transforming including: 1) a representation of a business model between one of said distinctive representations and said UML representation of said business model; and 2) means for creating bi-directional mapping between elements of said method of representation of a business model by said one of the distinctive representations and the method of representation of said business model by said UML representation; b.) means for modifying said UML representation of said business model; c.) means for modifying a distinctive representation of said business model to reflect the modification in said UML representation of said business model; and d.)second means for transforming said UML representation into a second distinctive representation of at least a portion of said business model.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
172 words
A computer system, including a repository, comprising: a.) first means for transforming a first distinctive representation of business model information into an OMG compliant UML representation of at least a portion of a business model and storing said representation in said repository in the form of a set of object classes, said first means for transforming including: 1) a representation of a business model between one of said distinctive representations and said UML representation of said business model; and 2) means for creating bi-directional mapping between elements of said method of representation of a business model by said one of the distinctive representations and the method of representation of said business model by said UML representation; b.) means for modifying said UML representation of said business model; c.) means for modifying a distinctive representation of said business model to reflect the modification in said UML representation of said business model; and d.)second means for transforming said UML representation into a second distinctive representation of at least a portion of said business model.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
17 words
The system of claim 1 wherein business model information comprises at least portion of a business model.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of claim 1 wherein business model information comprises one or more components of a legacy business process application.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
57 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said first distinctive representation comprises a first distinctive representation of a plurality of objects and wherein said first means for transforming comprise means for transforming said first distinctive representation of a subset of said plurality of objects into an OMG compliant UML representation of said subset of said plurality of objects.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
53 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said UML representation comprises a generalized representation of a plurality of objects and wherein said second means for transforming comprise means for transforming said UML representation of a subset of said plurality of objects into a second distinctive representation of said subset of said plurality of objects.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
100 words
A computer-implemented method comprising the steps of: a) first step of transforming a first distinctive representation of business model information into an OMG compliant UML representation of at least a portion of a business model; b) storing said UML representation as a set of object classes; c) second step of transforming said UML representation into a second distinctive representation of at least a portion of said business model; d) modifying said business model stored in said UML representation; and e) modifying a distinctive representation of said business model to reflect the modification in said UML representation of said business model.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
100 words
A computer-implemented method comprising the steps of: a) first step of transforming a first distinctive representation of business model information into an OMG compliant UML representation of at least a portion of a business model; b) storing said UML representation as a set of object classes; c) second step of transforming said UML representation into a second distinctive representation of at least a portion of said business model; d) modifying said business model stored in said UML representation; and e) modifying a distinctive representation of said business model to reflect the modification in said UML representation of said business model.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 6 wherein the business model information comprises at least portion of a business model.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 6 wherein the business model information comprises one or more components of a legacy business process application.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
75 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said first step for transforming comprises the steps of: identifying differences in the method of representation of a business model between one of said distinctive representations and said UML representation of a business model; and creating bi-directional mapping between elements of the method of representation of a business model by said one of said distinctive representations and said method of representation of a business model by said UML representation.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said first distinctive representation comprises a first distinctive representation of a plurality of objects and wherein said first step of transforming comprises the step of transforming said first distinctive representation of a subset of said plurality of objects into an OMG compliant UML representation of the subset of said plurality of objects.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said UML representation comprises a generalized representation of a plurality of objects and wherein said second step of transforming comprises the step of transforming said UML representation of a subset of the plurality of objects into a second distinctive representation of the subset of said plurality of objects.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
No citation records indexed.
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2003-03-14 | 2003-09-13 | 2004-03-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2007-03-14 | 2007-09-13 | 2008-03-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2011-03-14 | 2011-09-13 | 2012-03-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |