US6002347A — Integrated hazard avoidance system

Claim 1

Independent Claim 98 words

An aircraft flight hazard avoidance system comprising: a plurality of flight hazard warning systems wherein each of said systems generates an alert signal indicating a potential flight hazard; indicator means, responsive to said alert signals, for generating command indications corresponding to said alert signals for directing the operator of the aircraft to avoid said potential flight hazards; and an alerting system, responsive to at least two of said alert signals generated concurrently, for selecting one of said concurrently generated alert signals for input to said indicator means wherein said selected alert signal represents the most critical flight hazard.

Claim 2

Dependent Claim 98 words

An aircraft flight hazard avoidance system comprising: a plurality of flight hazard warning systems wherein each of said systems generates an alert signal indicating a potential flight hazard; indicator means, responsive to said alert signals, for generating command indications corresponding to said alert signals for directing the operator of the aircraft to avoid said potential flight hazards; and an alerting system, responsive to at least two of said alert signals generated concurrently, for selecting one of said concurrently generated alert signals for input to said indicator means wherein said selected alert signal represents the most critical flight hazard.

Claim 3

Dependent Claim 25 words

The system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of flight hazard warning systems includes a ground proximity warning system and a traffic collision warning system.

Claim 4

Dependent Claim 19 words

The system of claim 2 wherein said plurality of flight hazard warning systems additionally includes a predictive windshear system.

Claim 5

Dependent Claim 21 words

The system of claim 3 wherein said plurality of flight hazard warning systems additionally includes an enhanced ground proximity warning system.

Claim 6

Dependent Claim 19 words

The system of claim 4 wherein said plurality of flight hazard warning systems additionally includes a reactive windshear system.

Claim 7

Dependent Claim 68 words

The system of claim 1 wherein said alerting system includes flight path means for determining the projected flight path as suggested by each of said alert signals, wherein said alerting system includes threat condition means, responsive to said flight path means, for suppressing a generated one of said alert signals when said projected flight path as suggested by said alert signal would increase the threat to the aircraft.

Claim 8

Dependent Claim 69 words

The system of claim 1 wherein said alerting system includes comparing means for comparing a first one of said alert signals to a second subsequently generated one of said alert signals to determine whether said second alert signal represents a greater hazard probability than a hazard probability represented by said first alert signal and selecting for input to said indicator means the alert signal having the greatest hazard probability.

Claim 9

Dependent Claim 48 words

The system of claim 7 wherein said comparing means includes complementary means for determining if the corresponding command indications for said first and said second alert signals are complementary and selecting for input to said indicator means said second alert signal if said alert signals are not complementary.

Claim 10

Dependent Claim 36 words

The system of claim 1 wherein said alerting system includes a memory storing a plurality of alert priorities and computer means for selecting from said alert priorities said alert signal representing the most critical flight hazard.

Claim 11

Dependent Claim 36 words

The system of claim 9, wherein said alert priorities are based on an estimation of alert time and an estimation of the probability the hazard will result in an accident for each of said alert signals.

Claim 12

Dependent Claim 35 words

The system of claim 9 wherein said computer means in response to said alert priorities suppresses said alert signals which can not contribute to a pilot's situation awareness and which can contribute to pilot confusion.

Claim 13

Dependent Claim 38 words

The system of claim 9 wherein said computer means in response to said alert priorities suppresses a subsequent one of said alert signals having the same expected pilot reaction as a previously generated one of said alert signals.

Claim 14

Dependent Claim 18 words

The system of claim 9 wherein said alert priorities additionally represent expected pilot reaction to said alert signals.

Claim 15

Dependent Claim 19 words

The system of claim 9 wherein said alert priorities are based on the altitude of the aircraft above ground.

Claim 16

Dependent Claim 30 words

The system of claim 14 wherein said flight hazard warning systems include a ground proximity warning system having modes 1-5, a traffic collision warning system and a windshear alert system.

Claim 17

Dependent Claim 34 words

The system of claim 15 wherein said computer means suppresses said alert signals from said windshear alert system and 3 of 5 modes of said ground proximity warning system above a first predetermined altitude.

Claim 18

Dependent Claim 49 words

The system of claim 16 wherein said computer means enables said alert signals from said windshear alert system while suppressing said alert signals from 3 of 5 modes of said ground proximity warning system below said first predetermined altitude above ground and above a second predetermined altitude above ground.

Claim 19

Dependent Claim 51 words

The system of claim 17 wherein said computer means enables said alert signals from 3 of 5 modes of said ground proximity warning system and suppresses selected ones of said alert signals from said traffic collision warning system below said second predetermined altitude and above a third predetermined altitude above ground.

Claim 20

Dependent Claim 73 words

The system of claim 1 including: an I/O module adapted to receive flight data from the aircraft; a central computer operatively connected to said I/O module and wherein at least two of said warning systems and said alerting system is implemented in said central computer; and wherein said indicator means includes a speaker for generating aural alerts and a cockpit display for generating visual displays of alerts in response to said alert signals.

Claim 21

Dependent Claim 34 words

The system of claim 19 wherein said flight warning systems include a traffic collision warning system and wherein one of said warning systems implemented in said central computer is a ground proximity warning system.

Claim 22

Dependent Claim 56 words

The system of claim 20 including inhibit means for transmitting an inhibit signal from said alert system to said traffic collision warning system when said alert signal generated by said traffic collision warning system does not represent the most critical flight hazard, wherein said traffic collision warning system is inhibited when the inhibit signal is received.

Claim 23

Dependent Claim 35 words

The system of claim 20 wherein said I/O module is adapted to receive data from a weather radar and wherein one of said warning systems implemented in said central computer is a windshear warning system.

Claim 24

Dependent Claim 30 words

The system of claim 22 wherein said windshear system is a predictive windshear system and one of said warning systems implemented in said central computer is a reactive windshear system.

Claim 25

Dependent Claim 24 words

The system of claim 20 wherein one of said warning systems implemented in said central computer system is an enhanced ground proximity warning system.

Claim 26

Dependent Claim 15 words

The system of claim 19 wherein said central computer includes a plurality of processor units.

Claim 27

Independent Claim 83 words

A method for providing a alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: monitoring sensor data; analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards; outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of aircraft altitude; and generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 28

Independent Claim 83 words

A method for providing a alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: monitoring sensor data; analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards; outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of aircraft altitude; and generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 29

Independent Claim 94 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: monitoring sensor data; analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards; outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of a particular combination of hazardous flight conditions represented within said multiple alert condition; and generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 30

Independent Claim 94 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: monitoring sensor data; analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards; outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of a particular combination of hazardous flight conditions represented within said multiple alert condition; and generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 31

Independent Claim 87 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: monitoring sensor data; analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards; outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of a flight path of the aircraft; and generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 32

Independent Claim 87 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: monitoring sensor data; analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards; outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of a flight path of the aircraft; and generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 33

Independent Claim 95 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: monitoring sensor data; analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards; outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of anticipated corrective responses to the hazardous flight conditions represented within said multiple alert condition; and generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 34

Independent Claim 95 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: monitoring sensor data; analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards; outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of anticipated corrective responses to the hazardous flight conditions represented within said multiple alert condition; and generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 35

Independent Claim 86 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: (a) detecting if a first hazardous flight condition exits; (b) determining if a second hazardous flight condition exists; (c) comparing said first hazardous condition and said second hazardous condition according to a predefined criterion, wherein said step of comparing further comprises determining if corrective actions to said first and said second hazardous flight conditions are complementary; and (d) issuing an alert based on a result of step (c).

Claim 36

Independent Claim 86 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of: (a) detecting if a first hazardous flight condition exits; (b) determining if a second hazardous flight condition exists; (c) comparing said first hazardous condition and said second hazardous condition according to a predefined criterion, wherein said step of comparing further comprises determining if corrective actions to said first and said second hazardous flight conditions are complementary; and (d) issuing an alert based on a result of step (c).

Claim 37

Dependent Claim 29 words

The method of claim 30 wherein said step of comparing further comprises the step of comparing a relative hazard of each of said first and second hazardous flight conditions.

Claim 38

Dependent Claim 29 words

The method of claim 30 wherein said step of comparing further comprises the step of comparing a flight path associated with each of said first and second hazardous conditions.

Claim 39

Independent Claim 65 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for aircraft comprising the steps of: detecting a hazardous condition; determining if a projected flight path associated with an alert of said hazardous condition increases a threat condition of the aircraft; and suppressing an alert of said hazardous flight condition if the flight path associated with said hazardous flight condition increases said threat condition.

Claim 40

Independent Claim 65 words

A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for aircraft comprising the steps of: detecting a hazardous condition; determining if a projected flight path associated with an alert of said hazardous condition increases a threat condition of the aircraft; and suppressing an alert of said hazardous flight condition if the flight path associated with said hazardous flight condition increases said threat condition.

Claim 41

Independent Claim 104 words

A device for providing an alert within an aircraft of a hazardous flight condition, said device comprising: an input for receiving sensor data; a plurality of hazard detecting functions, each of said functions coupled to receive a given set of said sensor data, for determining if a hazard condition exists; an alert generation device, having an input coupled to each of said plurality of hazard detecting functions, for evaluating an input signal indicative of the hazardous condition, and for outputting an alert signal based upon a predetermined alert schedule; and a command generating device for generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 42

Independent Claim 104 words

A device for providing an alert within an aircraft of a hazardous flight condition, said device comprising: an input for receiving sensor data; a plurality of hazard detecting functions, each of said functions coupled to receive a given set of said sensor data, for determining if a hazard condition exists; an alert generation device, having an input coupled to each of said plurality of hazard detecting functions, for evaluating an input signal indicative of the hazardous condition, and for outputting an alert signal based upon a predetermined alert schedule; and a command generating device for generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

Claim 43

Dependent Claim 24 words

The device of claim 34 further comprising a fault tolerant database for coupling said plurality of hazard detecting functions to said alert generating device.

Annuity Stage	Window Opens	Payment Deadline	Surcharge Period Until	Estimated Fee	Status
3.5 Years (Year 4)	2002-12-13	2003-06-14	2003-12-14	$2000.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8)	2006-12-13	2007-06-14	2007-12-14	$3760.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12)	2010-12-13	2011-06-14	2011-12-14	$7700.00	Window Closed / Lapsed

Integrated hazard avoidance system

Abstract

Inventors

Bibliographic Details

Claims Analysis

References Cited (Backward Citations)

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Assigned Categories & Tags

Assign Category Tag