Apparatus and process for inspecting print material

Claim 3

The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein said pixel intensity range circuit has a pixel intensity range detector and a reference memory for storing the pixel intensity range from said pixel intensity range detector.

Claim 4

The apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein said pixel intensity range detector further includes a maximum pixel intensity detector and a maximum reference memory for storing maximum pixel intensity values from said maximum pixel intensity detector and a minimum pixel intensity detector and a minimum reference memory for storing minimum pixel intensity values from said minimum pixel intensity detector.

Claim 5

The apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein said pixel classifier circuit further includes an average value reference memory for storing the average intensity values of said pixel intensity range and a classification reference memory for storing the classification values calculated from said pixel intensity range.

Claim 6

The apparatus as claimed in claim 4 wherein said reference addresses are calculated using said average intensity values and said classification values of said pixel classifier circuit.

Claim 7

The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein said defect detector circuit further includes a table reader circuit for acquiring one of said flaw severity codes in said look-up table memory at said look-up table index, and a flaw severity memory for storing said corresponding flaw severity code.

Claim 8

The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein said defect rejecter circuit comprising: a histogram accumulator circuit for receiving said output data from said defect detector circuit wherein said accumulator circuit accumulates the count of occurrences of said output data having particular flaw severity codes and stores said accumulated count of said occurrences into a histogram memory; a flaw grade calculation circuit for calculating the flaw grades by reading said count of occurrences of each of said flaw severity codes from said histogram memory and the corresponding flaw weight values from a flaw weight memory; and an accept-reject decision circuit for receiving said flaw grade values and comparing said flaw grade values to the flaw grade threshold values.

Claim 9

The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein said apparatus further includes an optical digitizing circuit for capturing at least one reference image and a target image.

Claim 10

The apparatus as claimed in claim 8 wherein said optical digitizing circuit has at least one capturing channel.

Claim 13

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said reference pixel intensity value for each pixel data is an average pixel intensity value determined from a plurality of reference images.

Claim 14

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said pixel intensity of each of said pixel data of said target image in said comparing step is subtracted from said reference address generating a difference value wherein said difference value is an index to an entry of said look-up table containing a flaw severity code corresponding to said pixel data.

Claim 15

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said pixel intensity of each of said pixel data of said target image in said comparing step is added to said reference address generating a sum value wherein said sum value is an index to an entry of said look-up table containing a flaw severity code corresponding to said pixel data.

Claim 16

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said method is applied to each channel on a multiple channel image.

Claim 17

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said method is applied to a single channel image.

Claim 18

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said method is applied to a row of data from a line scan camera.

Claim 19

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said pixel intensity value is a pixel intensity gradient value.

Claim 20

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said reference pixel intensity value and said pixel classification value for each pixel data is determined from a minimum pixel intensity and a maximum pixel intensity of each pixel data calculated from at least one reference image.

Claim 21

The method as claimed in claim 18 wherein said minimum pixel intensity is determined from the least minimum of the minimum intensities of said pixel data and the adjacent pixel data, and wherein said maximum pixel intensity is determined from the highest maximum of the maximum intensities of said pixel data and the adjacent pixel data.

Claim 22

The method as claimed in claim 19 wherein said pixel classification value for each pixel data is assigned to a pixel class wherein said pixel class is one of eight pixel classes selected from the group consisting of edge mask classes, ink category classes and a substrate class, said assignment to said pixel class depending on said reference pixel intensity value and on the pixel intensity range of each pixel data calculated by subtracting said least minimum of the minimum intensities of said pixel data and the adjacent pixel data from said highest maximum of the maximum intensities of said pixel data and the adjacent pixel data.

Claim 23

The method as claimed in claim 18 wherein said minimum pixel intensity and said maximum pixel intensity is undated when the process variation is detected.

Claim 24

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said aggregating step comprising: accumulating a histogram of the occurrences of each of said flaw severity codes in said target image; multiplying said occurrences of each of said flaw severity codes with a predetermined weighting factor of each of said flaw severity codes; grouping each of said multipliers into under inking or over inking types of said flaw severity codes; summing said under inking multipliers to obtain the under inking flaw grade value, and summing said over inking multipliers to obtain the over inking flaw grade value; and comparing said under inking flaw grade value to an under inking flaw grade threshold and said over inking flaw grade value to an over inking flaw grade threshold to determine the acceptability of said target image.

Claim 25

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said aggregating step comprising: accumulating the occurrences of each of said flaw severity codes in said target image into histogram bins; and comparing each of said histogram bins to the corresponding threshold values to determine the acceptability of said target image.

Claim 26

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said step of comparing said aggregated flaw occurrences further comprising comparing said aggregated flaw occurrences to a warning threshold and a reject threshold wherein said target image is accepted when said aggregated result is less than said warning threshold, and wherein said target image is accepted with a warning when said aggregated result is equal to or greater than said warning threshold but is less than said reject threshold, and wherein said target image is rejected when said aggregated result is equal to or greater than said reject threshold.

Claim 27

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said step of creating said reference template further includes digitally registering subsequent reference images with respect to the first reference image before creating said reference template.

Claim 28

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said target image is digitally registered with respect to said at least one reference image before comparing each pixel intensity of said target image to said corresponding pixel data stored in said reference template.

Claim 29

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said step of adjusting said center offsetting step includes adding said reference pixel intensity value to said center offsetting step result.

Claim 30

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said step of adjusting said center offsetting step includes subtracting said reference pixel intensity value from said center offsetting step result.

Claim 31

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said predetermined flaw severity codes for each classification value contained in said look-up table are separated within each of said classification values in said look-up table into groups of under inking, over inking and no flaw types of said flaw severity codes.

Claim 32

The method as claimed in claim 10 wherein said look-up table containing said predetermined flaw severity codes is updated when the detection sensitivity is changed.

Claim 33

A program product comprising: a computer usable medium having computer readable program code means embodied therein for detecting pattern flaws, said computer readable program code means in said program product comprising: computer readable first program code means for causing the computer to effect creating a reference template from at least one reference image by calculating a reference address for each pixel data of said reference template, said calculating step comprising the steps of: multiplying a classification value of each pixel data by twice a gray scale range; center offsetting the result of said multiplying step by adding said gray scale range to said result; and adjusting said center offsetting step result with a reference pixel intensity value for each of said pixel data; computer readable second program code means for causing the computer to effect storing said reference template; computer readable third program code means for causing the computer to effect comparing each pixel intensity of a target image to a corresponding pixel data stored in said reference template; computer readable fourth program code means for causing the computer to effect using the result of said comparing step as an index to a look-up table containing predetermined flaw severity codes; computer readable fifth program code means for causing the computer to effect reading an entry of said look-up table at said look-up table index to obtain a flaw severity code of said pixel data in said target image; computer readable sixth program code means for causing the computer to effect aggregating the occurrences of said flaw severity codes in said target image; and computer readable seventh program code means for causing the computer to effect comparing said aggregated flaw occurrences to at least one threshold value and determining the acceptability of said target image.

Claim 34

A program product comprising: a computer usable medium having computer readable program code means embodied therein for detecting pattern flaws, said computer readable program code means in said program product comprising: computer readable first program code means for causing the computer to effect creating a reference template from at least one reference image by calculating a reference address for each pixel data of said reference template, said calculating step comprising the steps of: multiplying a classification value of each pixel data by twice a gray scale range; center offsetting the result of said multiplying step by adding said gray scale range to said result; and adjusting said center offsetting step result with a reference pixel intensity value for each of said pixel data; computer readable second program code means for causing the computer to effect storing said reference template; computer readable third program code means for causing the computer to effect comparing each pixel intensity of a target image to a corresponding pixel data stored in said reference template; computer readable fourth program code means for causing the computer to effect using the result of said comparing step as an index to a look-up table containing predetermined flaw severity codes; computer readable fifth program code means for causing the computer to effect reading an entry of said look-up table at said look-up table index to obtain a flaw severity code of said pixel data in said target image; computer readable sixth program code means for causing the computer to effect aggregating the occurrences of said flaw severity codes in said target image; and computer readable seventh program code means for causing the computer to effect comparing said aggregated flaw occurrences to at least one threshold value and determining the acceptability of said target image.