Patent US5963656A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5963656A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for determining the quality of fingerprint images
Assignee: Pendragon Networks LLC
•
Filing: 1996-09-30
•
Granted: 1999-10-05
•
Expires: 2016-09-30
Abstract
Abstract A fingerprint image is divided into blocks of pixels. The blocks are marked as directional or non-directional. The blocks are also determined to be within the foreground or background of the image. Contiguous regions of blocks that are in the foreground and are directional are selected. The quality measure is the ratio of the area of all these selected contiguous regions to the total area of the fingerprint image (i.e., the foreground.) The contribution of each of the blocks of the regions to the quality measure can be given by a distance from a block containing a reference point (a block of reference) within the foreground. Further, the block of reference can be located at the centroid of the foreground. Images are judged to be of poor quality if the quality measure is below a quality threshold and are judged to be of good quality if the quality measure is above the quality threshold. Optionally, poor quality images are examined further to determine if they are smudged or come from a dry finger. Good quality images are further processed to determine if they are partial or entire images of the fingerprint.
Inventors
- 👤 Rudolf Maarten Bolle
- 👤 Sharathchandra Umapatirao Pankanti
- 👤 Yi-Sheng Yao
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 17:03
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06V; G06V40/00; G06V40/10; G06V40/12; G06V40/1347; G06V10/00; G06V10/98; G06V10/993
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
201 words
A system for determining the quality of fingerprint images comprising: a computer comprising at least one central processing unit, at least one memory, and at least one input device; at least one fingerprint image stored in said at least one memory, said at least one fingerprint image being acquired through said at least one input device and comprising a foreground and a background, said at least one fingerprint image further comprising a plurality of blocks of pixels with at least one block of pixels being directional and at least one block of pixels being non-directional; said computer operating under the direction of a region process stored in said at least one memory for selecting regions of blocks, the selected regions of blocks each comprising contiguous blocks that are within the foreground and directional and each said region of blocks having a total number of blocks above a region threshold; and said computer further operating under the direction of a quality process stored in said at least one memory for determining a quality measure for the fingerprint image, the determined quality measure comprising a ratio of a combined area of the regions of blocks of pixels to an area of the foreground.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
201 words
A system for determining the quality of fingerprint images comprising: a computer comprising at least one central processing unit, at least one memory, and at least one input device; at least one fingerprint image stored in said at least one memory, said at least one fingerprint image being acquired through said at least one input device and comprising a foreground and a background, said at least one fingerprint image further comprising a plurality of blocks of pixels with at least one block of pixels being directional and at least one block of pixels being non-directional; said computer operating under the direction of a region process stored in said at least one memory for selecting regions of blocks, the selected regions of blocks each comprising contiguous blocks that are within the foreground and directional and each said region of blocks having a total number of blocks above a region threshold; and said computer further operating under the direction of a quality process stored in said at least one memory for determining a quality measure for the fingerprint image, the determined quality measure comprising a ratio of a combined area of the regions of blocks of pixels to an area of the foreground.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
38 words
A system, as in claim 1, where said at least one input device is comprised of at least one of a camera, an image scanner, and a second computer connected to a network in common with the system.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
A system, as in claim 1, where the blocks of pixels comprise down-sampled subsets of pixels from an area on an original fingerprint image.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
62 words
A system, as in claim 1, where each of the blocks of pixels is represented by a distance from a point of reference within the foreground, and where the determined quality measure is comprised of a ratio of the sum of weights of all of the blocks within all of the regions to weights of all of the blocks within the foreground.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
16 words
A system in claim 4, where the point of reference is the centroid of the foreground.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
47 words
A system, as in claim 1, where the fingerprint image is determined to be of poor quality if the determined quality measure is below a quality threshold, and the image is determined to be of good quality if the determined quality measure is above the quality threshold.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
56 words
A system, as in claim 6, where the poor quality image is processed further by said computer using a dry fingerprint process by determining that a difference between a maximum and a minimum contrast measure between a selected block in one of the regions and a plurality of neighboring blocks is greater than a dryness threshold.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
52 words
A system, as in claim 6, where the poor quality image is processed further by said computer using a smudge fingerprint process by determining that a multiplicity of the mean of ridge pixels and a standard deviation of intensities of all pixels within a selected block is smaller than a smudginess threshold.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
63 words
A system, as in claim 6, where the good quality image is further processed by said computer using a partial image process that determines if the image is a partial image of an entire image of the fingerprint by determining whether there exists a path consisting of a sequence of blocks, and traversing through both left and right parts of the fingerprint image.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
178 words
A method of determining a quality measure of a fingerprint image, comprising the steps of: selecting at least one block of pixels in the fingerprint image; determining whether the selected at least one block has a prominent direction, wherein those blocks having a prominent direction are defined as being directional blocks and wherein those blocks not having a prominent direction are defined as being non-directional blocks; determining that a particular block is a foreground block if the number of pixels within the block, whose absolute value of an intensity difference between the pixel and at least one neighboring pixel is greater than a a background threshold, and determining that a particular block is a background block if the number of pixels within the block, whose absolute value of the intensity difference between the pixel and the at least one neighboring pixel is less than the background threshold; creating regions of contiguous foreground and directional blocks; and determining the quality measure as a ratio of the areas of all of the created regions to an area of the foreground.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
178 words
A method of determining a quality measure of a fingerprint image, comprising the steps of: selecting at least one block of pixels in the fingerprint image; determining whether the selected at least one block has a prominent direction, wherein those blocks having a prominent direction are defined as being directional blocks and wherein those blocks not having a prominent direction are defined as being non-directional blocks; determining that a particular block is a foreground block if the number of pixels within the block, whose absolute value of an intensity difference between the pixel and at least one neighboring pixel is greater than a a background threshold, and determining that a particular block is a background block if the number of pixels within the block, whose absolute value of the intensity difference between the pixel and the at least one neighboring pixel is less than the background threshold; creating regions of contiguous foreground and directional blocks; and determining the quality measure as a ratio of the areas of all of the created regions to an area of the foreground.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
148 words
A method for processing an image of a fingerprint, comprising steps of: obtaining an image of a fingerprint, the image being comprised of pixels; processing the fingerprint image to partition the image into blocks of pixels each specified to be one of a background block or a foreground block; further processing foreground blocks to obtain regions each comprised of set of contiguous foreground blocks wherein the pixels of a block exhibit a prominent directionality; weighting blocks as a function of distance from a common reference point within the fingerprint image; determining a quality measure for the fingerprint image by computing a ratio of a summation of total weights of blocks exhibiting a prominent directionality to a summation of the weights of the foreground blocks; and directing further processing of the fingerprint image based on the determined quality measure by comparing the determined quality measure to a quality threshold.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
148 words
A method for processing an image of a fingerprint, comprising steps of: obtaining an image of a fingerprint, the image being comprised of pixels; processing the fingerprint image to partition the image into blocks of pixels each specified to be one of a background block or a foreground block; further processing foreground blocks to obtain regions each comprised of set of contiguous foreground blocks wherein the pixels of a block exhibit a prominent directionality; weighting blocks as a function of distance from a common reference point within the fingerprint image; determining a quality measure for the fingerprint image by computing a ratio of a summation of total weights of blocks exhibiting a prominent directionality to a summation of the weights of the foreground blocks; and directing further processing of the fingerprint image based on the determined quality measure by comparing the determined quality measure to a quality threshold.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method as in claim 11, wherein the common reference point is a centroid of the regions of foreground blocks.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
54 words
A method as in claim 11, wherein if the determined quality measure is less than the quality threshold, the further processing is comprised of a step of performing an analysis of the fingerprint image to determine if the fingerprint image represents a dry impression of a fingerprint or a smudged impression of the fingerprint.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
57 words
A method as in claim 13, wherein a first step of the analysis is to compute the mean intensity (μ) of the pixels in each foreground block of pixels, and where the computed mean intensity is used when determining if the fingerprint image represents the dry impression of the fingerprint or the smudged impression of the fingerprint.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method as in claim 11, wherein if the determined quality measure is greater than the quality threshold, the further processing is comprised of a step of performing a partial impression analysis of the fingerprint image.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-10-04 | 2003-04-05 | 2003-10-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-10-04 | 2007-04-05 | 2007-10-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-10-04 | 2011-04-05 | 2011-10-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |