US5962173A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for measuring the effectiveness of optical proximity corrections
Assignee: Future Link Systems LLC
•
Filing: 1997-10-16
•
Granted: 1999-10-05
•
Expires: 2017-10-16
Abstract
Abstract The effectiveness of various types of optical proximity correction schemes for avoiding line shortening are easily evaluated by imprinting a test pattern on a semiconductor wafer. The pattern includes an easily measurable standard measurement element not susceptible to line shortening and a test element having a series of parallel lines with narrow widths comparable to the widths of the circuit features that are susceptible to line shortening. The test element also includes the same optical proximity correction scheme whose effectiveness is to be measured. The entire test pattern is photolithographed onto the wafer and the lengths of measurement element and the test element are measured and compared to determine the effectiveness of the correction. Several test patterns, each with a different form of optical proximity correction, can be lithographed onto a single wafer for a comparative review of the different correction schemes both in focus and out of focus both positively and negatively.
Inventors
- 👤 Pierre Leroux
- 👤 Sethi Satyendra
- 👤 David Ziger
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 23:51
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70483; G03F7/70605; G03F7/70616; G03F7/70425; G03F7/70433; G03F7/70441; G03F7/70633; G03F7/70641
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 29
Claim 1
Independent Claim
151 words
A method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme employed to compensate for line shortening effect arising when forming narrow circuit features in an integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer comprising: preparing a mask having a test pattern, said test pattern including; a standard measurement element having a first nominal dimension, the ends of which being defined by measurement edges having widths sufficient to effectively preclude line shortening and a test element having a series of parallel lines of a second nominal dimension, at least one of the ends of which being defined by a measurement edge having a width comparable to the width of said circuit features and also including the optical proximity correction scheme whose effectiveness is to be measured; photolithographing said test pattern onto a wafer; and measuring the lengths of said standard and test element of said test pattern as photolithographed onto said wafer.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
151 words
A method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme employed to compensate for line shortening effect arising when forming narrow circuit features in an integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer comprising: preparing a mask having a test pattern, said test pattern including; a standard measurement element having a first nominal dimension, the ends of which being defined by measurement edges having widths sufficient to effectively preclude line shortening and a test element having a series of parallel lines of a second nominal dimension, at least one of the ends of which being defined by a measurement edge having a width comparable to the width of said circuit features and also including the optical proximity correction scheme whose effectiveness is to be measured; photolithographing said test pattern onto a wafer; and measuring the lengths of said standard and test element of said test pattern as photolithographed onto said wafer.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 1 wherein said first and said second nominal dimensions are equal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 1 wherein said parallel lines are spaced from each other by a distance equal to the width of said lines.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 1 wherein said test pattern includes an island pattern including an array of island elements each of which has an individual length equal to its width.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 1 wherein a plurality of said test patterns are prepared said plurality of test patterns including different optical proximity correction schemes.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 1 wherein said optical proximity correction scheme is a lengthening of the lines of said second nominal dimension.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 1 wherein said optical proximity correction scheme is the addition of a serif at the ends of said second nominal dimension.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 7 wherein said serif is a hammerhead configuration.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 7 wherein said serif is an eared configuration.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 7 wherein said serif is a uniform enlargement of the sides of the parallel lines at the ends thereof.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 7 wherein said serif is stepped.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme on a semiconductor wafer as described in claim 1 wherein said standard measurement element comprises a series of lines and spaces.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
142 words
A single mask for measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme employed to compensate for line shortening effect arising when forming narrow circuit features in an integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer with a stepper lens, said mask including a test pattern resolvable on a wafer comprising: a standard measurement element having a first nominal dimension, the ends of which being defined by measurement edges having widths sufficient to effectively preclude line shortening by said stepper lens and a test element having a series of parallel lines of a second nominal dimension, at least one of the ends of which being defined by a measurement edge having a width comparable to the width of said circuit features and subject to line shortening by said stepper lens and also including the optical proximity correction scheme whose effectiveness is to be measured.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
142 words
A single mask for measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme employed to compensate for line shortening effect arising when forming narrow circuit features in an integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer with a stepper lens, said mask including a test pattern resolvable on a wafer comprising: a standard measurement element having a first nominal dimension, the ends of which being defined by measurement edges having widths sufficient to effectively preclude line shortening by said stepper lens and a test element having a series of parallel lines of a second nominal dimension, at least one of the ends of which being defined by a measurement edge having a width comparable to the width of said circuit features and subject to line shortening by said stepper lens and also including the optical proximity correction scheme whose effectiveness is to be measured.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
17 words
A mask as described in claim 13 wherein said first and said second nominal dimensions are equal.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
26 words
A mask as described in claim 13 wherein said parallel lines are spaced from each other by a distance equal to the width of said lines.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
32 words
A mask as described in claim 13 wherein said test pattern includes an island pattern including an array of island elements each of which has an individual length equal to its width.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
27 words
A mask as described in claim 13 wherein a plurality of said test patterns are prepared; said plurality of test patterns including different optical proximity correction schemes.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
24 words
A mask as described in claim 13 wherein said optical proximity correction scheme is a lengthening of the lines of said second nominal dimension.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
27 words
A mask as described in claim 13 wherein said optical proximity correction scheme is the addition of a serif at the ends of said second nominal dimension.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
14 words
A mask as described in claim 19 wherein said serif is a hammerhead configuration.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
14 words
A mask as described in claim 19 wherein said serif is an eared configuration.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
25 words
A mask as described in claim 19 wherein said serif is a uniform enlargement of the sides of the parallel lines at the ends thereof.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
12 words
A mask as described in claim 19 wherein said serif is stepped.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
19 words
A mask as described in claim 13 wherein said standard measurement element comprises a series of lines and spaces.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
159 words
A single mask for measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme employed to compensate for line shortening effect arising when forming narrow circuit features in an integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer with a stepper lens comprising: an array of test patterns disposed throughout the area of the mask; each of said test patterns in said array being resolvable on a wafer and including; a standard measurement clement having a first nominal dimension, the ends of which being defined by measurement edges having widths sufficient to effectively preclude line shortening by said stepper lens and a test element having a series of parallel lines of a second nominal dimension, at least one of the ends of which being defined by a measurement edge having a width comparable to the width of said circuit features and subject to line shortening by said stepper lens and also including the optical proximity correction scheme whose effectiveness is to be measured.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
159 words
A single mask for measuring the effectiveness of an optical proximity correction scheme employed to compensate for line shortening effect arising when forming narrow circuit features in an integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer with a stepper lens comprising: an array of test patterns disposed throughout the area of the mask; each of said test patterns in said array being resolvable on a wafer and including; a standard measurement clement having a first nominal dimension, the ends of which being defined by measurement edges having widths sufficient to effectively preclude line shortening by said stepper lens and a test element having a series of parallel lines of a second nominal dimension, at least one of the ends of which being defined by a measurement edge having a width comparable to the width of said circuit features and subject to line shortening by said stepper lens and also including the optical proximity correction scheme whose effectiveness is to be measured.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
22 words
A mask as defined in claim 25 wherein said array of test patterns includes test patterns having different optical proximity correction schemes.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5328807A
Cited
US5546225A
Cited
US5439765A
Cited
US5700602A
Cited
US5798195A
Cited
US5447810A
Cited
US5698346A
Cited
US5731109A
Cited
US5800951A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-10-04 | 2003-04-05 | 2003-10-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-10-04 | 2007-04-05 | 2007-10-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-10-04 | 2011-04-05 | 2011-10-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |