Patent US5953238A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5953238A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for generating control system setpoints with implicit dependencies

Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1996-03-12
•
Granted: 1999-09-14
•
Expires: 2016-03-12
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method for modeling linear control systems that are asymptotically stable provided that any initial deviation is within a definite bound is described. The method includes the steps of generating a parametric model of the quasi steady state system, generating a time-invariant parametric mapping function, using the system model, to relate a system setpoint parameter at a system setpoint function to an input process parameter implicit in a system implicit parameter, and generating an interface protocol to adjust the time-invariant parametric mapping function to account for any time-dependent variations in the relative performance between the input process parameter and the implicit system parameter.

Inventors

  • 👤 Christofer M. Mowry
  • 👤 Israel Nir

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-04 14:13
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B17/00; G05B17/02

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 27
Claim 1
Independent Claim 62 words
A method for generating a system setpoint reference function for a boiling water reactor system, said method comprising the steps of: generating a parametric model of the system; defining a time-invariant parametric mapping function; and generating an interface protocol to adjust the time-invariant parametric mapping function to account for any time-dependent variations between an input process parameter and an implicit system parameter.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 62 words
A method for generating a system setpoint reference function for a boiling water reactor system, said method comprising the steps of: generating a parametric model of the system; defining a time-invariant parametric mapping function; and generating an interface protocol to adjust the time-invariant parametric mapping function to account for any time-dependent variations between an input process parameter and an implicit system parameter.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 28 words
A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the system implicit parameter, a system setpoint parameter, and the input process parameter are utilized in generating the parametric model.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 39 words
A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the mapping function is generated using the parametric model to relate a system setpoint parameter at a system setpoint function to the input process parameter implicit in the system implicit parameter.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 46 words
A method in accordance with claim 3 wherein relating the system setpoint parameter to the input process parameter comprises the step of collapsing a three dimensional system operating surface into a two-dimensional space defined by the control system input process parameter and the system setpoint parameter.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method in accordance with claim 4 wherein collapsing the three dimensional system operating surface is performed along the system setpoint function.
Claim 7
Independent Claim 106 words
A method for generating a system setpoint reference function for a boiling water reactor system, said method comprising the steps of: generating a parametric model of the system using a system implicit parameter, x 1 , a system setpoint parameter, x 2 , and an input process parameter, X 3 , wherein a system operating surface is described by the relationship of x 1 , x 2 , and x 3 ; defining a time-invariant parametric mapping function; and generating an interface protocol to adjust the time-invariant parametric mapping function to account for any time-dependent variations between the input process parameter and the system implicit parameter.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 106 words
A method for generating a system setpoint reference function for a boiling water reactor system, said method comprising the steps of: generating a parametric model of the system using a system implicit parameter, x 1 , a system setpoint parameter, x 2 , and an input process parameter, X 3 , wherein a system operating surface is described by the relationship of x 1 , x 2 , and x 3 ; defining a time-invariant parametric mapping function; and generating an interface protocol to adjust the time-invariant parametric mapping function to account for any time-dependent variations between the input process parameter and the system implicit parameter.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 54 words
A method in accordance with claim 6 wherein the system operating surface is defined as: S(x.sub.1, x.sub.2, x.sub.3)=Constant, where parameter x 1 is the system implicit parameter and is an independent variable of a system setpoint function, parameter x 2 is the system setpoint parameter, and parameter x 3 is the input process parameter.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 19 words
A method in accordance with claim 7 wherein the system setpoint function is defined as: x.sub.2 =g.sub.SSF (x.sub.1). 9.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 33 words
A method in accordance with claim 8 wherein for a given value of the input process parameter, the system implicit parameter is directly related to the system setpoint parameter by: x.sub.1 =F(x.sub.2,x.sub.3 ').
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 16 words
A method in accordance with claim 9 wherein the parametric mapping function is: x.sub.1 =Ω.sub.PMF (x.sub.3).
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 18 words
A method in accordance with claim 10 wherein the setpoint reference function is: x.sub.2 =g.sub.SSF (Ω.sub.PMF (x.sub.3)). 12.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 33 words
A method in accordance with claim 11 wherein generating an interface protocol comprises the step of defining an alignment reference trajectory inside the system operating envelope as: x.sub.2 =g.sub.ART (x.sub.1). x.sub.1 =f.sub.ART (x.sub.3).
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 29 words
A method in accordance with claim 12 wherein generating an interface protocol comprises the step of generating an alignment measured trajectory defined as: x.sub.2 =g.sub.ART (x.sub.1). x.sub.1 =f.sub.ART (x.sub.3).
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 44 words
A method in accordance with claim 13 wherein an alignment correction, Δ ALIGN , is established as a function of the measured input process parameter value (x 3 ), by conserving the implicit system parameter value, x 1 : f.sub.AMT (x.sub.3)=f.sub.ART (x.sub.3 =Δ.sub.ALIGN). 15.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 38 words
A method in accordance with claim 14 wherein compensations for any system performance changes are incorporated by the alignment correction as: x.sub.2 =g.sub.SSF (Ω.sub.PMF (x.sub.3 =Δ.sub.ALIGN)), where x 3 is the measured value of the input process parameter.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 66 words
A method in accordance with claim 15 wherein criterion for continued applicability of the parametric mapping function requires that the system model satisfies: ##EQU13## for any value of x' 3 , where ε is sufficiently small, and x 2 analytical and x 2 empirical refer to the analytical system model value and the measured value of the system setpoint parameter at a common x' 3 value.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 48 words
A method in accordance with claim 16 wherein trajectories on the system operating surface are equivalent to empirical values of the input process parameter if: |x.sub.3.sup.empirical -x.sub.3.sup.analytical |.sub.x.sbsb.1 '.sub., x.sbsb.2 '≦δ, where x' 1 and x' 2 represent any common point and δ is defined consistent with ε.
Claim 20
Independent Claim 87 words
A method for determining reactor trip setpoints as a function of reactor coolant recirculation flow, said method comprising the steps of: generating a parametric model of the system, the parametric model including core flow, W T , core power, P, and recirculation drive flow, W D , related by: W.sub.T =f.sub.SURF (P, W.sub.D); and defining a time-invariant parametric mapping function as: ##EQU14## where a core flow value at the intersection of setpoint function i and reference power control line n, is designated as W T i ,n.
Claim 21
Independent Claim 87 words
A method for determining reactor trip setpoints as a function of reactor coolant recirculation flow, said method comprising the steps of: generating a parametric model of the system, the parametric model including core flow, W T , core power, P, and recirculation drive flow, W D , related by: W.sub.T =f.sub.SURF (P, W.sub.D); and defining a time-invariant parametric mapping function as: ##EQU14## where a core flow value at the intersection of setpoint function i and reference power control line n, is designated as W T i ,n.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 14 words
A method in accordance with claim 18 wherein the trip reference function is: ##EQU15##20.
Claim 23
Independent Claim 82 words
A method for generating a system setpoint reference function for controlling a boiling water reactor system in a nuclear power plant, said method comprising the steps of: generating a parametric model of the system using a system implicit parameter, a system setpoint parameter, and an input process parameter; defining a time-invariant parametric mapping function; and generating an interface protocol to adjust the time-invariant parametric mapping function to account for any time-dependent variations between the input process parameter and the system implicit parameter.
Claim 24
Independent Claim 82 words
A method for generating a system setpoint reference function for controlling a boiling water reactor system in a nuclear power plant, said method comprising the steps of: generating a parametric model of the system using a system implicit parameter, a system setpoint parameter, and an input process parameter; defining a time-invariant parametric mapping function; and generating an interface protocol to adjust the time-invariant parametric mapping function to account for any time-dependent variations between the input process parameter and the system implicit parameter.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 33 words
A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein the parametric model includes core flow, W T , core power, P, and recirculation drive flow, W D , related by: W.sub.T =f.sub.SURF (P, W.sub.D).
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 42 words
A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein the time-invariant parametric mapping function is defined as: ##EQU16## where a core flow value at the intersection of setpoint function i and reference power control line n, is designated as W T i ,n.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 42 words
A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein the interference protocol produces a trip reference setpoint function defined as: ##EQU17## where P n i represents the core power value at the intersection of set point i and reference power control line n.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3919720A Cited
US4605530A Cited
US4707324A Cited
US4717532A Cited
US4728486A Cited
US4836862A Cited
US5572125A Cited
US5619433A Cited
US5552984A Cited
US5687291A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2002-09-13 2003-03-15 2003-09-14 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2006-09-13 2007-03-15 2007-09-14 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2010-09-13 2011-03-15 2011-09-14 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag