← Back to Patent Explorer
US5940124A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Attentional maps in objective measurement of video quality degradation

Assignee: Tektronix Inc
•
Filing: 1997-07-18
•
Granted: 1999-08-17
•
Expires: 2017-07-18
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Attentional maps that reflect the subjective view of an observer to the effects of degradation in a video image are used in the objective measurement of video quality degradation. The observer assists in generating an attentional map for each image of a test image sequence, which provides different thresholds or weighting factors for different areas of each image. A video image sequence from a system under test is compared with the test image sequence, and the error results are displayed as a function of the corresponding attentional maps.

Inventors

  • 👤 Bozidar Janko
  • 👤 John W. Edwards

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 17:54
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04N; H04N17/00; H04N17/004

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim 72 words
A method of measuring video quality degradation comprising the steps of: generating an attentional map for each image of a test image sequence; capturing a video image sequence corresponding to the test image sequence after it has been processed by a system under test; and comparing the test image sequence with the video image sequence with the results being weighted in accordance with the corresponding attentional maps to provide a measurement display.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 72 words
A method of measuring video quality degradation comprising the steps of: generating an attentional map for each image of a test image sequence; capturing a video image sequence corresponding to the test image sequence after it has been processed by a system under test; and comparing the test image sequence with the video image sequence with the results being weighted in accordance with the corresponding attentional maps to provide a measurement display.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 53 words
The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the steps of: initially selecting a measurement type from among a set of measurements that determines the results to be displayed as part of the measurement display; and preprocessing the video image sequence according to the selected measurement type prior to the comparing step.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 61 words
The method as recited in claim 2 wherein the preprocessing step comprises the steps of: performing specified measurements on the video image sequence to obtain measurement values according to the selected measurement type; testing the measurement values against limits to determine whether an out of limits situation is present; and providing a warning if the out of limits situation is present.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 65 words
The method as recited in claim 2 wherein the capturing step comprises the steps of: converting the video image sequence to serial digital if input in a composite format; searching for a test sequence trigger within the video image sequence; verifying that the test sequence trigger corresponds to the selected measurement type; and storing a frame of the video image sequence in a storage device.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 58 words
The method as recited in claim 4 wherein the comparing step comprises the steps of: retrieving the captured frame from the storage device; checking to see whether a comparable reference frame is available; and performing the measurement type using the captured frame and the comparable reference frame together with the corresponding attentional map to provide the measurement display.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 78 words
An instrument for measuring video quality degradation comprising: means for storing an attentional map for each image of a test image sequence; means for capturing a video image sequence corresponding to the test image sequence after the test image sequence has been processed by a system under test; and means for comparing the test image sequence with the video image sequence with the results being weighted in accordance with the corresponding attentional maps to provide a measurement display.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 78 words
An instrument for measuring video quality degradation comprising: means for storing an attentional map for each image of a test image sequence; means for capturing a video image sequence corresponding to the test image sequence after the test image sequence has been processed by a system under test; and means for comparing the test image sequence with the video image sequence with the results being weighted in accordance with the corresponding attentional maps to provide a measurement display.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US5757287A Cited
US5446492A Cited
US5596264A Cited
US5774569A Cited
US5818520A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2002-08-16 2003-02-15 2003-08-17 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2006-08-16 2007-02-15 2007-08-17 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2010-08-16 2011-02-15 2011-08-17 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag