Patent US459165A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US5886909A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5886909A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Defect diagnosis using simulation for IC yield improvement
Assignee: GlobalFoundries Inc
•
Filing: 1997-12-19
•
Granted: 1999-03-23
•
Expires: 2017-12-19
Abstract
Abstract Defects in integrated circuit wafers (10) are often difficult to diagnose, because patterned wafer inspections can only be done after certain wafer processing steps. Defect simulation is used to understand the relation between defects in the wafer (10) and the resulting wafer profiles. Defects such as particles (50) and bubbles (22) in the photoresist (28), for example, translate into a wide variety of defective profiles. Knowledge of the relation between defects and the defect profiles can assist in yield improvement efforts, since defects may be diagnosed by comparing simulated and observed defect profiles. From the simulated defect profiles, methods can be adapted to fix or correct observed defects.
Inventors
- 👤 Linda Milor
- 👤 Yeng-Kaung Peng
- 👤 Khoi Anh Phan
- 👤 David Steele
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 08:25
CPC Classifications
H; H10; H10P; H10P74/00; H10P74/23
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 31
Claim 1
Independent Claim
91 words
A method of diagnosing defects that impact topography of an integrated circuit wafer surface, comprising the steps of: scanning an integrated circuit wafer surface after predetermined processing steps have been performed on the wafer; storing any defect data detected from the scanned wafer in a defect profile; comparing the stored defect profile against a library of wafer surface defect types based on known wafer defect characteristics to identify a possible cause for the defect profile; and running predetermined experiments to narrow the number of feasible defect causes for the defect profile.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
91 words
A method of diagnosing defects that impact topography of an integrated circuit wafer surface, comprising the steps of: scanning an integrated circuit wafer surface after predetermined processing steps have been performed on the wafer; storing any defect data detected from the scanned wafer in a defect profile; comparing the stored defect profile against a library of wafer surface defect types based on known wafer defect characteristics to identify a possible cause for the defect profile; and running predetermined experiments to narrow the number of feasible defect causes for the defect profile.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of fixing wafer surface defects according to known techniques based on the feasible defect causes identified.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein the step of running predetermined experiments comprises the step of classifying defect types obtained from the predetermined experiments as feasible or infeasible causes of the defect profile.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein the step of running predetermined experiments comprises the step of running plural simulations of known defects.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method defined in claim 4, wherein the step of running plural simulations of known defects comprises varying both defect size and defect composition.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method defined in claim 4, wherein the step of running plural simulations comprises the step of calibrating the simulator to match non-defective wafer topography.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method defined in claim 4, wherein the step of running plural simulations comprises the step of simulating the defects caused by unintended particles in wafer processing.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method defined in claim 4, wherein the step of running plural simulations comprises the step of simulating the defects caused by bubbles in wafer processing.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method defined in claim 4, wherein the step of running plural simulations comprises the step of simulating the defects caused by foreign material in wafer processing.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method defined in claim 4, wherein the step of running plural simulations comprises the step of simulating the defects caused by chemical reactions in wafer processing.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
113 words
A method of developing a library of defects in integrated circuits, comprising the steps of: calibrating a defect simulator to match nominal wafer data for a non-defective integrated circuit; running plural defect simulations to determine the effect of changes in size and composition of known defects; developing defect profiles of common defects and their characteristics based on the plural defect simulations and storing the defect profiles in a library; comparing the defect profiles in the library against actual wafer defects; classifying potential defect profiles as feasible or infeasible causes of the actual wafer defects based on the comparison; and running predetermined experiments to narrow the range of feasible causes for the actual defects.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
113 words
A method of developing a library of defects in integrated circuits, comprising the steps of: calibrating a defect simulator to match nominal wafer data for a non-defective integrated circuit; running plural defect simulations to determine the effect of changes in size and composition of known defects; developing defect profiles of common defects and their characteristics based on the plural defect simulations and storing the defect profiles in a library; comparing the defect profiles in the library against actual wafer defects; classifying potential defect profiles as feasible or infeasible causes of the actual wafer defects based on the comparison; and running predetermined experiments to narrow the range of feasible causes for the actual defects.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method defined in claim 11, wherein the step of running plural defect simulations comprises performing simulations for different exposure patterns.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method defined in claim 11, wherein the step of running plural defect simulations comprises the step of simulating the defects caused by unintended particles in wafer processing.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method defined in claim 11 wherein the step of running plural defect simulations comprises the step of simulating the defects caused by bubbles in wafer processing.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method defined in claim 11 wherein the step of running plural defect simulations comprises the step of simulating the defects caused by foreign material in wafer processing.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method defined in claim 11, wherein the step of running plural defect simulations comprises the step of simulating the defects caused by chemical reactions in wafer processing.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
101 words
A method of detecting defects in integrated circuits that impact doping concentrations, comprising the steps of: measuring integrated circuit wafer electrical test data; determining if at least one wafer site demonstrates bad wafer electrical test data; running a simulator, calibrated to match nominal wafer electrical test data, to perform plural defect simulations, and comparing simulated data with measured wafer electrical test data; classifying defect simulation results as feasible or infeasible causes of the bad wafer electrical test data; and performing predetermined tests to narrow the set of feasible causes of the bad wafer electrical test data by using different test structures.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
101 words
A method of detecting defects in integrated circuits that impact doping concentrations, comprising the steps of: measuring integrated circuit wafer electrical test data; determining if at least one wafer site demonstrates bad wafer electrical test data; running a simulator, calibrated to match nominal wafer electrical test data, to perform plural defect simulations, and comparing simulated data with measured wafer electrical test data; classifying defect simulation results as feasible or infeasible causes of the bad wafer electrical test data; and performing predetermined tests to narrow the set of feasible causes of the bad wafer electrical test data by using different test structures.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method defined in claim 17, further comprising the step of fixing the identified defect according to known techniques.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein the bad wafer electrical test data comprises high resistance.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein the bad wafer electrical test data comprises non-uniform distribution.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein the bad wafer electrical test data comprises undesirable device performances.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein the step of performing plural defect simulations comprises simulating particles blocking various types of wafer implants.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein the step of performing plural defect simulations comprises simulating particles blocking various types of wafer implants.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein the step of performing plural defect simulations comprises simulating changes in defect position.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein the step of performing plural defect simulations comprises simulating changes in defect size.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein the step of performing plural defect simulations comprises simulating changes in defect composition.
Claim 30
Independent Claim
97 words
A method for fixing defects in an integrated circuit wafer, comprising the steps of: simulating the effect caused by at least one known integrated circuit wafer defect; storing the cause and associated effect of the at least one known integrated circuit wafer defect in an index; measuring at least one actual integrated circuit wafer to detect the existence of any defect; determining if the defect in the actual integrated circuit wafer is included in the index; and identifying the defect in the actual integrated circuit wafer based on the cause of the defect stored in the index.
Claim 31
Independent Claim
97 words
A method for fixing defects in an integrated circuit wafer, comprising the steps of: simulating the effect caused by at least one known integrated circuit wafer defect; storing the cause and associated effect of the at least one known integrated circuit wafer defect in an index; measuring at least one actual integrated circuit wafer to detect the existence of any defect; determining if the defect in the actual integrated circuit wafer is included in the index; and identifying the defect in the actual integrated circuit wafer based on the cause of the defect stored in the index.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-03-22 | 2002-09-21 | 2003-03-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-03-22 | 2006-09-21 | 2007-03-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-03-22 | 2010-09-21 | 2011-03-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |