Patent US5868902A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5868902A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Security paper

Assignee: Portals Ltd
•
Filing: 1996-03-11
•
Granted: 1999-02-09
•
Expires: 2016-03-11
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The present invention relates to a method for producing security paper which includes a security feature. The method comprises forming paper in a wet state, which paper incorporates on or more security features, applying to the paper a sizing agent, thereafter applying to one or both sides of the sized paper a coating comprising an unpigmented polyurethane. The unpigmented polyurethane may optionally comprise a functional additive provided that the presence of the functional additive does not increase the opacity of the paper by more than 1%. After the polyurethane has been applied the paper is dried. The coating composition provides a film, when cast on a glass surface, having a Konig hardness of from 15 to 130 seconds.

Inventors

  • 👤 Paul Howland
  • 👤 Jonathan Paul Foulkes

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 22:19
CPC Classifications
D; D21; D21H; D21H21/00; D21H21/14; D21H21/40; B; B41; B41M; B41M3/00; B41M3/14; D21H19/00; D21H19/10; D21H19/14; D21H19/24; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T428/00; Y10T428/24; Y10T428/24802; Y10T428/24934

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim 341 words
A method for producing security paper which includes a security feature, which method comprises: (1) supplying paper-making fibres to a paper-machine; (2) incorporating into the paper during its manufacture at least one security feature and producing paper; (3) applying to the resulting paper a sizing agent to size the paper; (4) selecting a substantially transparent coating composition comprising an unpigmented polyurethane which may optionally comprise a functional additive provided that the presence of the functional additive does not increase the opacity of the resulting paper by more than 1% wherein said coating composition being such as to provide a film, when cast on a glass surface, having a Konig hardness of from 15 to 130 seconds, and also passing the water resistance test as defined by the following steps: (a) the total formulation to be used in the coating is cast on a glass plate so as to produce a film with a dry weight of 80 g/m 2 ; (b) the film is initially dried at 23° C. Once it is tack free it is dried for an additional hour at 80° C.; (c) the film is weighed before being wetted and tested for tensile strength, Young's Modulus and is visually checked for any change in its transparency; (d) a sample of the film is boiled in water containing 10 g/litre Na 2 CO 3 for 30 mins; (e) the film in then rinsed in cold water and the steps b) to c) are then repeated; wherein when the film is dried and re-weighed the film meets the following criteria: i) the wet tensile strength and Young's Modulus of the boiled film is not less than 90% of the initial film wet tensile strength and Young's Modulus; ii) the film shows no perceptible loss of transparency, and iii) the dried weight of the film is not less than 98% of the original weight; (5) applying the selected coating composition to one or both sides of the sized paper; (6) and thereafter drying the paper to produce the said security paper.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 341 words
A method for producing security paper which includes a security feature, which method comprises: (1) supplying paper-making fibres to a paper-machine; (2) incorporating into the paper during its manufacture at least one security feature and producing paper; (3) applying to the resulting paper a sizing agent to size the paper; (4) selecting a substantially transparent coating composition comprising an unpigmented polyurethane which may optionally comprise a functional additive provided that the presence of the functional additive does not increase the opacity of the resulting paper by more than 1% wherein said coating composition being such as to provide a film, when cast on a glass surface, having a Konig hardness of from 15 to 130 seconds, and also passing the water resistance test as defined by the following steps: (a) the total formulation to be used in the coating is cast on a glass plate so as to produce a film with a dry weight of 80 g/m 2 ; (b) the film is initially dried at 23° C. Once it is tack free it is dried for an additional hour at 80° C.; (c) the film is weighed before being wetted and tested for tensile strength, Young's Modulus and is visually checked for any change in its transparency; (d) a sample of the film is boiled in water containing 10 g/litre Na 2 CO 3 for 30 mins; (e) the film in then rinsed in cold water and the steps b) to c) are then repeated; wherein when the film is dried and re-weighed the film meets the following criteria: i) the wet tensile strength and Young's Modulus of the boiled film is not less than 90% of the initial film wet tensile strength and Young's Modulus; ii) the film shows no perceptible loss of transparency, and iii) the dried weight of the film is not less than 98% of the original weight; (5) applying the selected coating composition to one or both sides of the sized paper; (6) and thereafter drying the paper to produce the said security paper.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 18 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyurethane is in the form of an aqueous dispersion.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 14 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the coating also comprises an extender.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 13 words
A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the extender is a polyacrylate.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 26 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the coat weight of the coating comprising the polyurethane is between 0.05 and 20 grams per square meter.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 20 words
A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the coating weight is between 0.5 and 5 grams per square meter.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 27 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the coating comprising the polyurethane is applied to the paper immediately after sizing while the paper is still wet.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 53 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the coating comprising the polyurethane is applied to dry paper after completion of the steps of normal papermaking, wherein the steps of normal papermaking comprise forming the paper, wet pressing the paper, drying the paper, calendering the paper and winding the paper as finished paper.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 29 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the fibres which are present in the paper are natural or synthetic fibres or a mixture of natural and synthetic fibres.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 37 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polyuerethane is of the aliphatic polyester type and is used in a dispersion with the dispersion having a polyurethane content in the range 2% to 70% by weight.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the dispersion has a polyurethane content in the range 5% to 30% by weight.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 20 words
A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the polyurethane is cross-linkable and is cross-linked during drying of the paper.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 19 words
A method as claimed in claim 12 wherein the cross-linking is effected using an aziridine as a cross-linking agent.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 27 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the security feature is a watermark, or an embedded thread which thread may incorporate visual or covert security elements.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the coating composition comprises a functional additive which is a fluorescent or iridescent additive.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 33 words
A method of producing a security document wherein security paper is produced by a method as claimed in claim 1, and thereafter the resulting security paper is printed to form the security document.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 30 words
A method as claimed in claim 16, wherein a foil including a plain foil, a hologram or a kinogram is affixed to the security paper before or after the printing.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 14 words
A method as claimed in claim 16, wherein said security paper is a banknote.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3880706A Cited
US4462866A Cited
EP0185184A1 Cited
GB2170501A Cited
US5232527A Cited
US5660919A Cited
DE4336214A1 Cited
EP0599675A1 Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2002-02-08 2002-08-10 2003-02-09 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2006-02-08 2006-08-10 2007-02-09 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2010-02-08 2010-08-10 2011-02-09 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag