US5861750A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Geophysical methods and apparatus for determining the hydraulic conductivity of porous materials
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1997-04-15
•
Granted: 1999-01-19
•
Expires: 2017-04-15
Abstract
Abstract A method and device for determining the hydraulic conductivity of porous materials is disclosed. The method uses a general permeability equation for calculating the hydraulic conductivity. The resistivity of the porous material is measured when the porous material is at least partially saturated with a pore filling fluid. Other data, such as a formation factor, permeability constants of the porous material, and in situ moisture content of the porous material may also be derived or measured. The geophysical permeability equation is then used to calculate the hydraulic conductivity of the porous material from the measurements and data. Methods are also disclosed which provide an average hydraulic conductivity over a given area. A device for determining hydraulic conductivity of a porous material is disclosed which utilizes a plurality of electrodes for conducting electricity to the porous material. A resistivity meter may be attached between the electrodes for measuring the resistivity. The device may include an electrode positioning device for positioning the electrodes in a predetermined spacial relationship.
Inventors
- 👤 Dennis M. Anderson
- 👤 William J. Ehni
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 05:33
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V3/00; G01V3/38; G01V3/02
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
195 words
A geotechnical method of determining the in-situ hydraulic conductivity of a porous material under test (PMUT) by electrically probing said porous material's surface, comprising the steps of: a) analyzing a standard sample of a material (SSM) with geotechnical characteristics similar to those of the PMUT, said SSM, after evaluation by independent methods, having known hydraulic conductivity "K md ", known saturation levels "S" of its pore filling fluid, known irreducible water saturation "Sw irr ", known permeant resistivity "R w ", known material resistivity "R", b) solving for SSM, equation system: ##EQU5## where an iterative approach makes four unknowns converge to final values for the formation factor "a", the water saturation variable "n", the cementation exponent "m", and constant "C k ", of the SSM; c) measuring in-situ the resistivity "R" of the PMUT with an electrical probe; d) measuring by independent means, the moisture saturation "S" for the PMUT; e) solving, for porosity "φ", and hydraulic conductivity "K md " for PMUT, equation system ##EQU6## where S and R are obtained in steps c) and d) and R w , a, n, m, Sw irr , and C k , are those of SSM.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
195 words
A geotechnical method of determining the in-situ hydraulic conductivity of a porous material under test (PMUT) by electrically probing said porous material's surface, comprising the steps of: a) analyzing a standard sample of a material (SSM) with geotechnical characteristics similar to those of the PMUT, said SSM, after evaluation by independent methods, having known hydraulic conductivity "K md ", known saturation levels "S" of its pore filling fluid, known irreducible water saturation "Sw irr ", known permeant resistivity "R w ", known material resistivity "R", b) solving for SSM, equation system: ##EQU5## where an iterative approach makes four unknowns converge to final values for the formation factor "a", the water saturation variable "n", the cementation exponent "m", and constant "C k ", of the SSM; c) measuring in-situ the resistivity "R" of the PMUT with an electrical probe; d) measuring by independent means, the moisture saturation "S" for the PMUT; e) solving, for porosity "φ", and hydraulic conductivity "K md " for PMUT, equation system ##EQU6## where S and R are obtained in steps c) and d) and R w , a, n, m, Sw irr , and C k , are those of SSM.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step c) comprises reading resistivity values in multiple positions and averaging the results as "R".
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step a) extracts the resistivity value of the permeant "R w " of said porous material by electrode probing a mixture of the said the SSM and the pore filling fluid after allowing colloidal particles to settle and the dissolved salts within the mixture have stabilized to a state of equilibrium.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1 with further steps of: f) repeating steps c) at multiple locations, and; g) comparing, from location to location, the values for the hydraulic conductivity.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 1 with further steps of: h) repeating steps c) through e) after a predetermined time interval, and; i) comparing the hydraulic conductivity for different times to measure the change of hydraulic conductivity.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the electrical probe is comprised of at least four electrodes controlled by a positioning device.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said electrical probe includes means for varying separation distances between the electrodes to obtain hydraulic conductivity measurements for variable depths beneath the electrode probe.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said electrical probe is pivoted around a central perpendicular axis to reposition said electrodes.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method of claim 1 where the resistivity of step c) is obtained by averaging measurements over multiple positions at the same locations when rotating the probe around a central perpendicular axis to reposition said electrodes.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method of claim 1 where the evaluation of the SSM by independent methods comprises the application of the guidelines in ASTM D 5084-90 modified by using a non-conductive compaction mold with an installed Wenner array.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method of claim 1 where the evaluation of the SSM by independent methods comprises the application of the guidelines in ASTM D 5093-90.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-01-18 | 2002-07-20 | 2003-01-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-01-18 | 2006-07-20 | 2007-01-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-01-18 | 2010-07-20 | 2011-01-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |