Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
94 words
A method of probing the state of a telecommunications channel, comprising: a) generating at a transmitter a two-level or three-level probing signal, said two-level or three-level probing signal having a first μ-law level over a first frame and a second μ-law level over a second frame; b) detecting at a receiver the two-level or three-level probing signal; and c) determining at the receiver the presence and order of RB-signaling and PAD attenuation, and the amount of PAD attenuation by comparing indications of transforms of the detected probing signals to a plurality of threshold values.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
94 words
A method of probing the state of a telecommunications channel, comprising: a) generating at a transmitter a two-level or three-level probing signal, said two-level or three-level probing signal having a first μ-law level over a first frame and a second μ-law level over a second frame; b) detecting at a receiver the two-level or three-level probing signal; and c) determining at the receiver the presence and order of RB-signaling and PAD attenuation, and the amount of PAD attenuation by comparing indications of transforms of the detected probing signals to a plurality of threshold values.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: said two-level probing signal has a first PCM μ-law level over a first frame of six symbols, and a second PCM μ-law level over a second frame of six symbols.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: an average power of said two-level probing signal is approximately -12.0 dBm.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method according to claim 3, wherein: said first μ-law level is ±975, and said second μ-law level is ±1023.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method according to claim 3, wherein: said first μ-law level is ±879, and said second μ-law level is ±1087.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
50 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: said three-level probing signal has a first PCM μ-law level over a first frame of six symbols, and a second PCM μ-law level over a second frame of six symbols, and a third PCM μ-law level over a third frame of six symbols.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: an average power of said three-level probing signal is approximately -12.0 dBm.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method according to claim 7, wherein: said three-level probing signal has a third μ-law level over a third frame, said first μ-law level is ±975, said second μ-law level is ±1023, and said third μ-law level is ±1151.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: said three-level probing signal has a third μ-law level over a third frame, said first μ-law level is ±1599, said second μ-law level is ±5981, and said third μ-law level is ±6239.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: said first frame and said second frame are adjacent frames.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: said determining comprises adding said indications of transforms to obtain a sum, and comparing said sum to at least one of said plurality of threshold values.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: said first frame and said second frame each have a predetermined number of slots, and said generating, detecting, and determining are conducted for each of said predetermined number of slots.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein: said two-level or three-level probing signal comprises a multi-symbol pseudorandom sequence which is sent over several frames.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
107 words
An apparatus coupled to a telecommunications channel, said apparatus comprising: a) a transmitter which generates at least one of a two-level and three-level probing signal, said at least one of a two-level and three-level probing signal having a first μ-law level over a first frame and a second μ-law level over a second frame and chosen such that the presence and order of RB-signaling and PAD attenuation in the telecommunications channel, and the amount of PAD attenuation in the telecommunications channel can be determined by comparing indications of transforms of the at least one of a two-level and three-level probing signal to a plurality of threshold values.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
107 words
An apparatus coupled to a telecommunications channel, said apparatus comprising: a) a transmitter which generates at least one of a two-level and three-level probing signal, said at least one of a two-level and three-level probing signal having a first μ-law level over a first frame and a second μ-law level over a second frame and chosen such that the presence and order of RB-signaling and PAD attenuation in the telecommunications channel, and the amount of PAD attenuation in the telecommunications channel can be determined by comparing indications of transforms of the at least one of a two-level and three-level probing signal to a plurality of threshold values.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
41 words
An apparatus according to claim 14, wherein: said transmitter generates said two-level probing signal with a first PCM μ-law level over a first frame of six symbols, and with a second PCM μ-law level over a second frame of six symbols.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
29 words
An apparatus according to claim 14, wherein: said at least one of a two-level probing signal and a three-level probing signal has an average power of approximately -12.0 dBm.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
34 words
An apparatus according to claim 16, wherein: said first μ-law level is ±975, and said second μ-law level is ±1023, or said first μ-law level is ±879, and said second μ-law level is ±1087.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
91 words
An apparatus according to claim 14, wherein: said transmitter generates said three-level probing signal with a first PCM μ-law level over a first frame of six symbols, with a second PCM μ-law level over a second frame of six symbols, and with a third PCM μ-law level over a third frame, and said first μ-law level is ±975, said second μ-law level is ±1023, and said third μ-law level is ±1151, or said first μ-law level is ±1599, said second μ-law level is ±5981, and said third μ-law level is ±6239.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
24 words
An apparatus according to claim 14, wherein: said two-level or three-level probing signal comprises a multi-symbol pseudorandom sequence which is sent over several frames.