Patent US5809162A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5809162A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Surface analysis system and method

Assignee: Nokia of America Corp
•
Filing: 1995-12-22
•
Granted: 1998-09-15
•
Expires: 2015-12-22
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A surface analysis system can contactlessly, automatically, and rapidly detect, classify, and evaluate a surface of an object, particularly, an optical fiber end face, for discontinuities to derive a single pass/fail conclusion regarding the surface. The surface analysis system has a scope for capturing an image of the end face. A computer is connected to the scope. A machine vision system is associated with the computer for receiving the image. A surface analysis program is associated with the computer for driving the machine vision system. The program searches for any discontinuities in the image by analyzing each pixel and a corresponding pixel structure of pixels to determine whether a discontinuity resides at each pixel. Discontinuities are classified as one of the following: binary thresholds, local gradients, and directional gradients. The pixel structure includes a plurality of pixels that were previously analyzed. The program determines whether the surface is continuous based upon any discovered discontinuities.

Inventors

  • 👤 Andrei Csipkes
  • 👤 Muid Ur-Rehman Mufti
  • 👤 John Mark Palmquist

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 11:02
CPC Classifications
G; G02; G02B; G02B6/00; G02B6/24; G02B6/36; G02B6/38; G02B6/3807; G02B6/381; G02B6/3818

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 5
Claim 1
Independent Claim 413 words
A method for analyzing a surface of an optical fiber end face, comprising the steps of: (a) producing a digitized image of said optical fiber end face, said image having a plurality of pixels; (b) searching for discontinuities in said image by successively analyzing a plurality of contiguous pixels, said analysis at each said pixel including examining a pixel structure corresponding with each said pixel to determine whether a discontinuity resides at each said pixel, said pixel structure including a plurality of pixels that were previously analyzed: (c) analyzing structure memory elements that are contiguous and that are situated contiguous with a pixel that is currently analyzed, and referred to hereafter as a structure working element; (d) analyzing satellite elements that are contiguous with at least one of said memory elements and that are noncontiguous with respect to said structure working element; (e) determining whether said structure working element is a local gradient and a directional gradient based upon said analyses of said satellite elements and said structure memory elements, wherein: said local gradient is a pixel having an intensity that differs by at least a first predefined amount from intensities associated with surrounding pixels, wherein said local gradient corresponds with a surface texture discontinuity said directional gradient is a plurality of pixels having intensities that differ by at least a second predefined amount from intensities associated with pixels situated about said directional gradient, wherein said directional gradient corresponds with a scratch; (f) combining intensities of said satellite elements to derive a satellite element average; (g) comparing said satellite element average to said structure working element; (h) when said average is unequivalent to said structure working element within a first predefined threshold, then identifying said structure working element as a tentative gradient and performing the following steps: (1) comparing each said structure memory element to said structure working element; (2) when said structure memory element is equivalent to said structure working element as defined by a second predefined threshold, then identifying said structure working element as a directional gradient and identifying said structure memory element as a directional gradient if not already identified as such; (3) when said structure memory element is unequivalent to said structure working element as defined by said second predefined threshold, then identifying said tentative local gradient as a local gradient; and (i) when said average is equivalent to said structure working element as defined by said first predefined threshold, then identifying said structure working element as a nongradient.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 413 words
A method for analyzing a surface of an optical fiber end face, comprising the steps of: (a) producing a digitized image of said optical fiber end face, said image having a plurality of pixels; (b) searching for discontinuities in said image by successively analyzing a plurality of contiguous pixels, said analysis at each said pixel including examining a pixel structure corresponding with each said pixel to determine whether a discontinuity resides at each said pixel, said pixel structure including a plurality of pixels that were previously analyzed: (c) analyzing structure memory elements that are contiguous and that are situated contiguous with a pixel that is currently analyzed, and referred to hereafter as a structure working element; (d) analyzing satellite elements that are contiguous with at least one of said memory elements and that are noncontiguous with respect to said structure working element; (e) determining whether said structure working element is a local gradient and a directional gradient based upon said analyses of said satellite elements and said structure memory elements, wherein: said local gradient is a pixel having an intensity that differs by at least a first predefined amount from intensities associated with surrounding pixels, wherein said local gradient corresponds with a surface texture discontinuity said directional gradient is a plurality of pixels having intensities that differ by at least a second predefined amount from intensities associated with pixels situated about said directional gradient, wherein said directional gradient corresponds with a scratch; (f) combining intensities of said satellite elements to derive a satellite element average; (g) comparing said satellite element average to said structure working element; (h) when said average is unequivalent to said structure working element within a first predefined threshold, then identifying said structure working element as a tentative gradient and performing the following steps: (1) comparing each said structure memory element to said structure working element; (2) when said structure memory element is equivalent to said structure working element as defined by a second predefined threshold, then identifying said structure working element as a directional gradient and identifying said structure memory element as a directional gradient if not already identified as such; (3) when said structure memory element is unequivalent to said structure working element as defined by said second predefined threshold, then identifying said tentative local gradient as a local gradient; and (i) when said average is equivalent to said structure working element as defined by said first predefined threshold, then identifying said structure working element as a nongradient.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of scanning said pixels of said image with said pixel structure in a raster format.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of analyzing each said pixel only a single time during said searching step.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 49 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of searching for any binary thresholds in said image, said binary threshold being a plurality of pixels having intensities that differ by at least a third predefined amount from intensities associated with an average of pixel intensities in said image.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4738507A Cited
US4738508A Cited
US4787698A Cited
US5179419A Cited
US5265787A Cited
US5682440A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2001-09-14 2002-03-16 2002-09-15 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2005-09-14 2006-03-16 2006-09-15 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2009-09-14 2010-03-16 2010-09-15 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag