Patent US5788635A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5788635A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Adaptive persistence processing
Assignee: Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc
•
Filing: 1997-01-17
•
Granted: 1998-08-04
•
Expires: 2017-01-17
Abstract
Abstract The invention provides a method and system for adaptive persistence processing in an ultrasound imaging system. Acoustic signals are temporally filtered using an adaptive persistence filter, having a recursive stage followed by a nonrecursive stage. A set of filtering coefficients for each stage are supplied by a look-up table in a memory, addressed or indexed in response to a plurality of input or output pixel values. The look-up table may therefore embody any selected function of its input variables. The input variables for the look-up table function are a current input pixel value X n and a previous intermediate pixel value W n-1 , and the function embodied by the look-up table includes a relative first difference function for selecting a filter coefficient. A recursive filtering coefficient α is held constant over time, while a nonrecursive filtering coefficient γis adjusted dynamically in response to the current input pixel value X n and the previous intermediate pixel value W n-1 . The non-recursive stage filter has a frequency response that attenuates higher frequency components without attenuating a broad range of lower frequency components, relative to the recursive stage frequency response. The step response or settling time of the non-recursive stage filter always spans one frame interval, independent of the nonrecursive filtering coefficient, while the step response or settling time for the recursive stage filter is generally longer and is dependent on the recursive filtering coefficient.
Inventors
- 👤 J. Nelson Wright
- 👤 Jay Sterling Plugge
- 👤 D. Grant Fash, III
- 👤 Donald R. Langdon
- 👤 David J. Finger
- 👤 Brian M. Normand
- 👤 Ismayil M. Guracar
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 23:07
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03H; H03H21/00; H03H21/0012; G; G01; G01S; G01S7/00; G01S7/52; G01S7/52017; G01S7/52023; G01S7/52025; G01S7/52026; G01S7/52046; G01S7/52034; H03H2021/007; H03H2021/0079
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 54
Claim 1
Independent Claim
68 words
An adaptive persistence filter in an ultrasound imaging system, the filter comprising: a first stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters comprising a first input and a first output and responsive to a substantially constant filtering coefficient; and a second stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters operatively connected to the first output and responsive to a dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
68 words
An adaptive persistence filter in an ultrasound imaging system, the filter comprising: a first stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters comprising a first input and a first output and responsive to a substantially constant filtering coefficient; and a second stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters operatively connected to the first output and responsive to a dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
24 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein the substantially constant filtering coefficient is substantially constant for the time required to process one set of signals.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
15 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein the first stage filter is a recursive stage filter.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
15 words
The filter of claim 3 wherein the second stage filter is a nonrecursive stage filter.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
28 words
The filter of claim 3 further comprising: a delay operatively connected to the first output; a second input to the first stage filter operatively connected to the delay.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
15 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein the second stage filter is a nonrecursive stage filter.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
33 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein the dynamic filtering coefficient is responsive to a signal selected from the group of signals at: the first input, the first output, and a delayed first output.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
35 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein the dynamic filtering coefficient is responsive to at least two signals selected from the group of signals at: the first input, the first output, and a delayed first output.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
29 words
The filter of claim 8 wherein the dynamic filtering coefficient is responsive to a first signal at the first input and a second signal at the delayed first output.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
29 words
The filter of claim 8 wherein the dynamic filtering coefficient is responsive to a first signal at the first output and a second signal at the delayed first output.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
16 words
The filter of claim 1 further comprising a function block for providing the dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
16 words
The filter of claim 11 wherein the function block further provides the substantially constant filtering coefficient.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
38 words
The filter of claim 11 wherein the function block comprises a look-up table memory, a first function block input operatively connected to the first input, and a second function block input operatively connected to a delayed first output.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
47 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein a transfer function H(z) of said filter comprises a term k 1 k 2 (1+βz -1 )/(1-αz -1 ) wherein: k 1 =(1-α), k 2 =(1-γ), β=γ/(1-γ), γ is the dynamic filtering coefficient, and α is the substantially constant filtering coefficient.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
34 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein the dynamic filtering coefficient is adjusted in response to a function of an absolute value of a signal at the first input minus a delayed first output signal.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
33 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein a difference between a first signal at the first input and a second signal delayed from the first output is multiplied by the substantially constant filtering coefficient.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
32 words
The filter of claim 1 wherein a difference between a first signal at the first output and a second signal delayed from the first output is multiplied by the dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
76 words
A method of adaptive persistence filtering in an ultrasound imaging system, the method comprising the steps of: receiving an input signal; filtering the input signal with a first stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters responsive to a substantially constant filtering coefficient; and filtering an output signal from the first stage filter with a second stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters responsive to a dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
76 words
A method of adaptive persistence filtering in an ultrasound imaging system, the method comprising the steps of: receiving an input signal; filtering the input signal with a first stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters responsive to a substantially constant filtering coefficient; and filtering an output signal from the first stage filter with a second stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters responsive to a dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient in response to a signal selected from the group of: the input signal, the output signal and a delayed output signal.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 19 wherein the step of adjusting comprises obtaining the dynamic filtering coefficient from a memory.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 19 wherein the step of adjusting comprises adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient as a function of an absolute value of the input signal minus the delayed output signal.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient in response to at least two signals selected from the group of: the input signal, the output signal and a delayed output signal.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 22 wherein the step of adjusting comprises adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient in response to the input signal and the delayed output signal.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 22 wherein the step of adjusting comprises adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient in response to the output signal and the delayed output signal.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of generating a delayed output signal corresponding to a previous output signal from the first stage filter.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 18 wherein the step of filtering the input signal comprises the steps of: calculating a difference between the input signal and a delayed output signal; and multiplying the difference by the substantially constant filtering coefficient.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 18 wherein the step of filtering an output signal comprises the steps of: calculating a difference between the output signal and a delayed output signal; and multiplying the difference by the dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
95 words
An adaptive persistence filter in an ultrasound imaging system, the filter comprising: a first stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters comprising a first input and a first output and responsive to a first filtering coefficient; a second stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters operatively connected to the first output and responsive to a dynamic filtering coefficient; and the dynamic filtering coefficient responsive to at least two signals selected from the group of signals at: the first input, the first output, and a delayed first output.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
95 words
An adaptive persistence filter in an ultrasound imaging system, the filter comprising: a first stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters comprising a first input and a first output and responsive to a first filtering coefficient; a second stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters operatively connected to the first output and responsive to a dynamic filtering coefficient; and the dynamic filtering coefficient responsive to at least two signals selected from the group of signals at: the first input, the first output, and a delayed first output.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
13 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein the first filtering coefficient is substantially constant.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
15 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein the first stage filter is a recursive stage filter.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
15 words
The filter of claim 30 wherein the second stage filter is a nonrecursive stage filter.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
28 words
The filter of claim 30 further comprising: a delay operatively connected to the first output; a second input to the first stage filter operatively connected to the delay.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
15 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein the second stage filter is a nonrecursive stage filter.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
23 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein the dynamic filtering coefficient is responsive to the first input signal and the delayed first output signal.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
23 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein the dynamic filtering coefficient is responsive to the first output signal and the delayed first output signal.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
16 words
The filter of claim 28 further comprising a function block for providing the dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
38 words
The filter of claim 36 wherein the function block comprises a look-up table memory, a first function block input operatively connected to the first input, and a second function block input operatively connected to the delayed first output.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
46 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein a transfer function H(z) of said filter comprises a term k 1 k 2 (1+βz -1 )/(1-αz -1 ) wherein: k 1 =(1-α), k 2 =(1-γ), β=γ/(1-γ), γ is the dynamic filtering coefficient, and α is the first filtering coefficient.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
39 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein the dynamic filtering coefficient is adjusted dynamically in response to a function of an absolute value of a first signal at the first input minus a second signal at the delayed first output.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
32 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein a difference between a first signal at the first input and a second signal at the delayed first output is multiplied by the first filtering coefficient.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
32 words
The filter of claim 28 wherein a difference between a first signal at the first output and a second signal at the delayed first output is multiplied by the dynamic filtering coefficient.
Claim 45
Independent Claim
103 words
A method of adaptive persistence filtering in an ultrasound imaging system, the method comprising the steps of: receiving an input signal; filtering said input signal with a first stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters responsive to a first filtering coefficient; filtering an output signal from the first stage filter with a second stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters responsive to a dynamic filtering coefficient; and adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient in response to at least two signals selected from the group of: the input signal, the output signal and a delayed output signal.
Claim 46
Independent Claim
103 words
A method of adaptive persistence filtering in an ultrasound imaging system, the method comprising the steps of: receiving an input signal; filtering said input signal with a first stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters responsive to a first filtering coefficient; filtering an output signal from the first stage filter with a second stage filter selected from the group of: recursive and nonrecursive filters responsive to a dynamic filtering coefficient; and adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient in response to at least two signals selected from the group of: the input signal, the output signal and a delayed output signal.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 42 wherein the step of adjusting comprises adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient in response to the input signal and the delayed output signal.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 42 wherein the step of adjusting comprises adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient in response to the output signal and the delayed output signal.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 42 further comprising the step of providing the delayed output signal as a second input signal to the first stage filter.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 42 further comprising the step of providing the first filtering coefficient and the dynamic filtering coefficient with a memory operatively connected to the at least two signals.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 46 wherein the step of providing comprises providing a substantially constant first filtering coefficient.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 42 wherein the step of adjusting comprises adjusting the dynamic filtering coefficient as a function of an absolute value of the input signal minus the delayed output signal.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 42 wherein the step of filtering the input signal comprises the steps of: calculating a difference between the input signal and the delayed output signal; and multiplying the difference by the first filtering coefficient.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 42 wherein the step of filtering an output signal comprises the steps of: calculating a difference between the output signal and the delayed output signal; and multiplying the difference by the dynamic filtering coefficient.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
FR1329733A
Cited
US3690153A
Cited
US4176658A
Cited
US4043181A
Cited
GB1534366A
Cited
US4408492A
Cited
US4356731A
Cited
US4389893A
Cited
US4441368A
Cited
US4452085A
Cited
US4569353A
Cited
US4475400A
Cited
US4470303A
Cited
US4590582A
Cited
US4475398A
Cited
US4513621A
Cited
US4817617A
Cited
US4727506A
Cited
US4852576A
Cited
US4751846A
Cited
US4662380A
Cited
US4750367A
Cited
US4785818A
Cited
US4887306A
Cited
US4786818A
Cited
US5060515A
Cited
US5107841A
Cited
US5113706A
Cited
US5392211A
Cited
US5152292A
Cited
US5226420A
Cited
US5153711A
Cited
US5313948A
Cited
US5495846A
Cited
US5249548A
Cited
US5301674A
Cited
US5287753A
Cited
US5271404A
Cited
US5301168A
Cited
US5476096A
Cited
US5531224A
Cited
US5467770A
Cited
US5479926A
Cited
US5595179A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-08-03 | 2002-02-02 | 2002-08-04 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-08-03 | 2006-02-02 | 2006-08-04 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-08-03 | 2010-02-02 | 2010-08-04 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |