Method and apparatus for determining the position and alignment of wheels

Claim 2

An on board sensor for determining the relative position of linkage members in an automobile linkage which connects a wheel to an automobile body comprising: a trackable object which is configured to be physically coupled to a first linkage member; a tracking device suitable for association with a second linkage member and configured to be magnetically coupled to the trackable object so that the movements of the trackable object are substantially tracked by the tracking device as a result of the magnetic coupling between the trackable object and the tracking device; and a detector configured to determine the position of the tracking device; whereby the determined position of the tracking device associated with the second linkage member determines the position of the first linkage member which is physically coupled to the trackable object.

Claim 3

The on board sensor as recited in claim 1 wherein the first linkage member is associated with a ball joint.

Claim 4

The on board sensor as recited in claim 1 wherein the second linkage member is a lower control arm.

Claim 5

The on board sensor as recited in claim 1 wherein the first linkage member is a ball joint collar.

Claim 6

The on board sensor as recited in claim 1 wherein the tracking device is physically mounted on the second linkage member.

Claim 7

The on board sensor as recited in claim 1 wherein the tracking device further includes: a swing arm having an end which is configured to be magnetically coupled to the trackable object.

Claim 8

The on board sensor as recited in claim 6 wherein the detector further includes an encoder which encodes the position of the swing arm.

Claim 9

The on board sensor as recited in claim 7 wherein the encoder is an optical encoder.

Claim 10

The on board sensor as recited in claim 7 wherein the detector further includes a counter which counts the changes in position indicated by the encoder.

Claim 11

The on board sensor as recited in claim 7 wherein the detector further includes a reference point reset processor which resets the counter to a reference point when a predetermined number of counts representing changes in position in a certain direction are registered.

Claim 12

The on board sensor as recited in claim 7 wherein the encoder is an analog potentiometer.

Claim 13

The on board sensor as recited in claim 7 wherein the encoder is an analog optical encoder.

Claim 14

In automotive linkage for connecting wheels to a frame, a method of determining the state of alignment of wheels having toe angles comprising: defining an alignment condition when a first wheel having a first toe angle and a second wheel having a second toe angle are substantially aligned with each other, including, determining a first aligned toe angle of the first wheel relative to a first reference point, determining a second aligned toe angle of the second wheel relative to a second reference point, using the aligned angular difference between the first aligned toe angle of the first wheel and the second aligned toe angle of the second wheel to define an alignment range of differences between the first toe angle of the first wheel and the second toe angle of the second wheel, the differences within the alignment range of differences substantially corresponding to the wheels being substantially aligned; testing the alignment state of the wheels, including, determining a first test toe angle of the first wheel relative to a first toe angle reference point; determining a second test toe angle of the second wheel relative to a second toe angle reference point; using the tested angular difference between the first test toe angle and the second test toe angle to determine whether the tested angular difference is within the alignment range; whereby, it is determined whether the two wheels are aligned.

Claim 15

In automotive linkage for connecting wheels to a frame, a method of determining the state of alignment of wheels having toe angles comprising: defining an alignment condition when a first wheel having a first toe angle and a second wheel having a second toe angle are substantially aligned with each other, including, determining a first aligned toe angle of the first wheel relative to a first reference point, determining a second aligned toe angle of the second wheel relative to a second reference point, using the aligned angular difference between the first aligned toe angle of the first wheel and the second aligned toe angle of the second wheel to define an alignment range of differences between the first toe angle of the first wheel and the second toe angle of the second wheel, the differences within the alignment range of differences substantially corresponding to the wheels being substantially aligned; testing the alignment state of the wheels, including, determining a first test toe angle of the first wheel relative to a first toe angle reference point; determining a second test toe angle of the second wheel relative to a second toe angle reference point; using the tested angular difference between the first test toe angle and the second test toe angle to determine whether the tested angular difference is within the alignment range; whereby, it is determined whether the two wheels are aligned.

Claim 16

The method as recited in claim 13 wherein the alignment range of differences between the first toe angle of the first wheel and the second toe angle of the second wheel is defined to include angular differences which differ from the aligned angular difference within a tolerance that allows for factors other than wheel misalignment.

Claim 17

The method as recited in claim 14 wherein the alignment range is 20 degrees wide.

Claim 18

The method as recited in claim 13 wherein a plurality of tested angular differences are determined for a plurality of toe angles associated with the first wheel and a plurality of toe angles associated with the second wheel and wherein the plurality of tested angular differences are used to determine whether the two wheels are aligned.

Claim 19

The method as recited in claim 16 wherein the proportion of the plurality of tested angular differences which are within the alignment range is used to determine whether the two wheels are aligned.

Claim 20

The method as recited in claim 17 wherein the wheels are determined to be aligned if the proportion of the plurality of tested angular differences which are within the alignment range is greater than 20 degrees.

Claim 21

The method as recited in claim 16 wherein the average of the plurality of the tested angular differences which are within the alignment range is used to determine whether the two wheels are aligned.

Claim 22

The method as recited in claim 19 further including: determining an adjustment to the first wheel based on the average of the plurality of the tested angular differences which improves the alignment of the first wheel relative to the second wheel; and adjusting the toe angle of the first wheel according to the adjustment, whereby the alignment of the two wheels is improved.

Claim 23

The method as recited in claim 13 wherein the first reference point is arbitrarily determined.

Claim 24

The method as recited in claim 13 wherein the first reference point is determined to correspond to an angular position relative to the frame.

Claim 25

A method as recited in claim 13 further including: resetting the first reference point by measuring changes in the toe angle of the first wheel and setting the measured toe angle to a predetermined value upon the occurrence of a predetermined change in the toe angle of the first wheel.

Claim 26

A method as recited in claim 13 further including: determining an adjustment to the first wheel based on the tested angular difference which improves the alignment of the first wheel relative to the second wheel; and adjusting the toe angle of the first wheel according to the adjustment, whereby the alignment of the two wheels is improved.