Quality forecasting engine

Claim 2

An automated method of predicting the number of defects that will occur during the manufacturing of a new product design on a specific assembly, line, comprising: identifying and counting the components that are manufactured on said assembly line during a time period; counting the number of defects that are associated with each of said identified components; storing the counted defects in a first historical database; calculating the defect rate for each of said identified components and storing said defect rate in the first historical database; enumerating a bill of material for said new electronic assembly design; extracting information associated with a component from a library database into a quality forecasting engine, said information comprising part number, part description and part geometry; the quality forecasting engine importing the enumerated bill of material and the stored defect rate from the first historical database; and the quality forecasting engine performing a comparison of the imported enumerated bill of material information to the extracted information and to the imported stored defect rate, and calculating a predicted number of defects for said new electronic assembly.

Claim 3

The method as described in claim 1, further comprising an exception handler step, prior to the final step, wherein factors for components that are not resident in the first historical database or in the library database are input into the quality forecasting engine.

Claim 4

The method as described in claim 1, wherein the step of calculating a predicted number of defects comprises calculating a predicted number of defects for every component in the bill of material.

Claim 5

The method as described in claim 1, wherein the step of extracting and the step of importing comprises reformatting said information and said defect rate.

Claim 6

The method as described in claim 1, wherein said enumerated bill of material contains a listing of every component in said new electronic assembly design.

Claim 7

The method as described in claim 1, wherein if a component in said new electronic assembly design can not be compared with a stored defect rate for an equivalent component resident in said first historical database, then a stored defect rate from an equivalent component in a second historical database is imported into the quality forecasting engine.

Claim 8

An automated method of predicting the number of defects that will occur during the manufacturing of a new electronic assembly design on a specific assembly line, comprising: identifying and counting the components that are manufactured on said assembly line during a time period; counting the number of defects that are associated with each of said identified components; storing the counted defects in a first historical database; calculating the defect rate for each of said identified components and storing said defect rate in the first historical database; enumerating a bill of material for every component in said new electronic assembly design; extracting information associated with a component from a library database into a quality forecasting engine, said information comprising part number, part description and part geometry; the quality forecasting engine importing the enumerated bill of material and the stored defect rate from the first historical database; inputting into the quality forecasting engine factors for components that are not resident in the first historical database or in the library database; and the quality forecasting engine performing a comparison of the imported enumerated bill of material information to the extracted information and to the imported stored defect rate, and calculating a predicted number of defects for every component in the bill of material of said new electronic assembly.

Claim 9

An automated method of predicting the number of defects that will occur during the manufacturing of a new electronic assembly design on a specific assembly line, comprising: identifying and counting the components that are manufactured on said assembly line during a time period; counting the number of defects that are associated with each of said identified components; storing the counted defects in a first historical database; calculating the defect rate for each of said identified components and storing said defect rate in the first historical database; enumerating a bill of material for every component in said new electronic assembly design; extracting information associated with a component from a library database into a quality forecasting engine, said information comprising part number, part description and part geometry; the quality forecasting engine importing the enumerated bill of material and the stored defect rate from the first historical database; inputting into the quality forecasting engine factors for components that are not resident in the first historical database or in the library database; and the quality forecasting engine performing a comparison of the imported enumerated bill of material information to the extracted information and to the imported stored defect rate, and calculating a predicted number of defects for every component in the bill of material of said new electronic assembly.

Claim 10

The method as described in claim 7, wherein if a component in said new electronic assembly design can not be compared with a stored defect rate for an equivalent component resident in said first historical database, then a stored defect rate from an equivalent component in a second historical database is imported into the quality forecasting engine.