Patent US5740078A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5740078A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and system for determining optimum colorant loading using merit functions
Assignee: SABIC Global Technologies BV
•
Filing: 1995-12-18
•
Granted: 1998-04-14
•
Expires: 2015-12-18
Abstract
Abstract The present invention discloses a method and system for determining the total colorant loading and relative colorant proportions for a color formula that is used for reproducing a color standard. In the present invention, a spectrophotometer measures the spectral reflectance of the color standard. A plurality of color matching attributes are then specified and used for attaining a match with the color standard. A merit function scale for quantifying how well a previously used color match corresponds to the color standard is developed. The merit function scale includes qualitative descriptions for the color matching attributes and a corresponding range of quantitative values. Next, a database of previously used color matches are searched and the merit function scale is used for determining a set of color matches that best approximates the color standard. A color match is determined from the set of previous color matches that optimally reproduces the color standard. The colorant loading and relative colorant proportions of the color formula from the color match are then used to reproduce the color standard.
Inventors
- 👤 William Estel Cheetam
- 👤 John Frederick Graf
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 21:21
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01J; G01J3/00; G01J3/46; G01J3/463
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
190 words
A computer-implemented method for determining total colorant loading and relative colorant proportions for a color formula used for reproducing a color standard according to desired property and appearance specifications, the method comprising the steps of: measuring spectral reflectance of the color standard; specifying a plurality of color matching attributes used for attaining a match with the color standard that are in accordance with the desired property and appearance specifications; developing a merit function scale for quantifying how well a previously used color match corresponds to the color standard for each of the specified plurality of color matching attributes, the merit function scale comprising a plurality of qualitative descriptions for each of the specified plurality of color matching attributes and a corresponding range of quantitative values; searching a plurality of previously used color matches and using the merit function scale for determining a set of color matches that best approximates the color standard; determining a color match from the set of previous color matches that optimally reproduces the color standard; and using colorant loading and relative colorant proportions of a color formula from the color match to reproduce the color standard.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
190 words
A computer-implemented method for determining total colorant loading and relative colorant proportions for a color formula used for reproducing a color standard according to desired property and appearance specifications, the method comprising the steps of: measuring spectral reflectance of the color standard; specifying a plurality of color matching attributes used for attaining a match with the color standard that are in accordance with the desired property and appearance specifications; developing a merit function scale for quantifying how well a previously used color match corresponds to the color standard for each of the specified plurality of color matching attributes, the merit function scale comprising a plurality of qualitative descriptions for each of the specified plurality of color matching attributes and a corresponding range of quantitative values; searching a plurality of previously used color matches and using the merit function scale for determining a set of color matches that best approximates the color standard; determining a color match from the set of previous color matches that optimally reproduces the color standard; and using colorant loading and relative colorant proportions of a color formula from the color match to reproduce the color standard.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
20 words
The computer-implemented method according to claim 1, wherein the spectral reflectance of the color standard is measured by a spectrophotometer.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
The computer-implemented method according to claim 1, wherein the specifying step comprises designating relative importance of each of the plurality of color matching attributes with a weighting factor.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
The computer-implemented method according to claim 3, wherein the plurality of color matching attributes comprise spectral reflectance, total colorant loading, cost of color formula, optical density, color shift, metamerism, and adjustability.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
83 words
The computer-implemented method according to claim 3, wherein the searching step comprises: using the merit function scale to determine the quantitative values for each of the specified color matching attributes for each of the previously used color matches; aggregating the quantitative values of the color matching attributes with the corresponding weighting factors to generate a merit score; ranking the merit scores of all of the plurality of previously used color matches; and retrieving a set of color matches having the best merit scores.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
51 words
The computer-implemented method according to claim 5, wherein the aggregating step comprises summing the product of the quantitative value for each of the color matching attributes with the corresponding weighting factor to obtain a first sum and dividing the first sum with a second sum of all of the weighting factors.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
The computer-implemented method according to claim 5, wherein the retrieving step comprises retrieving the merit scores having the lowest scores.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
22 words
The computer-implemented method according to claim 1, wherein the qualitative descriptions of the merit function scale comprise excellent, good, average, and poor.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
36 words
The computer-implemented method according to claim 1, further comprising adapting the colorant loading and relative colorant proportions of the color formula of the color match if necessary to obtain an acceptable match with the color standard.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
223 words
A system for determining total colorant loading and relative colorant proportions for a color formula used for reproducing a color standard according to desired property and appearance specifications, the system comprising: a spectrophotometer for measuring spectral reflectance of the color standard; and a processor for determining total colorant loading and relative colorant proportions for a color formula that matches the color standard, the processor comprising means for specifying a plurality of color matching attributes used for attaining a match with the color standard that are in accordance with the desired property and appearance specifications; means for developing a merit function scale for quantifying how well a previously used color match corresponds to the color standard for each of the specified plurality of color matching attributes, the merit function scale comprising a plurality of qualitative descriptions for each of the specified plurality of color matching attributes and a corresponding range of quantitative values; means for searching a plurality of previously used color matches and using the merit function scale for determining a set of color matches that best approximates the color standard; means for determining a color match from the set of previous color matches that optimally reproduces the color standard; and means for using colorant loading and relative colorant proportions of a color formula from the color match to reproduce the color standard.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
223 words
A system for determining total colorant loading and relative colorant proportions for a color formula used for reproducing a color standard according to desired property and appearance specifications, the system comprising: a spectrophotometer for measuring spectral reflectance of the color standard; and a processor for determining total colorant loading and relative colorant proportions for a color formula that matches the color standard, the processor comprising means for specifying a plurality of color matching attributes used for attaining a match with the color standard that are in accordance with the desired property and appearance specifications; means for developing a merit function scale for quantifying how well a previously used color match corresponds to the color standard for each of the specified plurality of color matching attributes, the merit function scale comprising a plurality of qualitative descriptions for each of the specified plurality of color matching attributes and a corresponding range of quantitative values; means for searching a plurality of previously used color matches and using the merit function scale for determining a set of color matches that best approximates the color standard; means for determining a color match from the set of previous color matches that optimally reproduces the color standard; and means for using colorant loading and relative colorant proportions of a color formula from the color match to reproduce the color standard.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
26 words
The system according to claim 10, wherein the specifying means designates relative importance of each of the plurality of color matching attributes with a weighting factor.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
30 words
The system according to claim 11, wherein the plurality of color matching attributes comprise spectral reflectance, total colorant loading, cost of color formula, optical density, color shift, metamerism, and adjustability.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
90 words
The system according to claim 11, wherein the searching means comprises: means for using the merit function scale to determine the quantitative values for each of the specified color matching attributes for each of the previously used color matches; means for aggregating the quantitative values of the color matching attributes with the corresponding weighting factors to generate a merit score; means for ranking the merit scores of all of the plurality of previously used color matches; and means for retrieving a set of color matches having the best merit scores.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
49 words
The system according to claim 13, wherein the aggregating means sums the product of the quantitative value for each of the color matching attributes with the corresponding weighting factor to obtain a first sum and divides the first sum with a second sum of all of the weighting factors.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
18 words
The system according to claim 13, wherein the retrieving means retrieves the merit scores having the lowest scores.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
21 words
The system according to claim 10, wherein the qualitative descriptions of the merit function scale comprise excellent, good, average, and poor.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
37 words
The system according to claim 10, further comprising means for adapting the colorant loading and relative colorant proportions of the color formula of the color match if necessary to obtain an acceptable match with the color standard.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3601589A
Cited
US3916168A
Cited
US4653014A
Cited
US4813000A
Cited
US4887906A
Cited
US5067067A
Cited
US5499366A
Cited
US5311437A
Cited
US5502642A
Cited
US5546564A
Cited
US5541848A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-04-13 | 2001-10-13 | 2002-04-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-04-13 | 2005-10-13 | 2006-04-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-04-13 | 2009-10-13 | 2010-04-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |