US5736281A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Dose modification proximity effect compensation (PEC) technique for electron beam lithography
Assignee: Nokia of America Corp
•
Filing: 1996-06-07
•
Granted: 1998-04-07
•
Expires: 2016-06-07
Abstract
Abstract A method of compensating for proximity effects in electron beam lithography systems is disclosed. An uncorrected dose profile is obtained for the pattern features to be introduced into a layer of electron beam sensitive material, including a determination of the clearing dose for the electron beam sensitive resist and the dose height for each edge of the pattern feature. Thereafter the incident dose of exposure energy for introducing an image of the pattern into a layer of electron beam sensitive material is adjusted by designating the clearing dose for each edge of the pattern feature as a function of the dose height. The uncorrected dose profile for determining the dose height and the clearing dose is optionally obtained from a calibration step. Each feature is optionally partitioned into a plurality of subshapes and the incident dose of exposure energy is then adjusted for each edge of each subshape by designating the clearing dose for each edge of each subshape as a function of the dose height.
Inventors
- 👤 George Patrick Watson
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 12:48
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01J; H01J37/00; H01J37/30; H01J37/317; H01J37/3174; B; B82; B82Y; B82Y10/00; B82Y40/00; H01J2237/00; H01J2237/30; H01J2237/304; H01J2237/30455; H01J2237/30461; H01J2237/317; H01J2237/3175; H01J2237/31769; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S430/00; Y10S430/143
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim
122 words
Method for correcting proximity effects in an e-beam lithography system, the method comprising the steps of: applying an electron beam sensitive resist material onto a substrate; introducing an image of a pattern into the electron beam sensitive resist material, wherein the incident dose of radiation used to introduce the image of the pattern into the resist material is adjusted by obtaining an exposure dose profile of the pattern, determining a dose height that corresponds to each edge of a feature in said pattern, determining a clearing dose for each of said edges of the feature as a function of said dose height, and then determining an incident dose of radiation based upon the clearing dose; and developing the image of said pattern.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
122 words
Method for correcting proximity effects in an e-beam lithography system, the method comprising the steps of: applying an electron beam sensitive resist material onto a substrate; introducing an image of a pattern into the electron beam sensitive resist material, wherein the incident dose of radiation used to introduce the image of the pattern into the resist material is adjusted by obtaining an exposure dose profile of the pattern, determining a dose height that corresponds to each edge of a feature in said pattern, determining a clearing dose for each of said edges of the feature as a function of said dose height, and then determining an incident dose of radiation based upon the clearing dose; and developing the image of said pattern.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said exposure dose profile is obtained from a calibration process comprising the steps of: applying an electron beam sensitive resist material onto a substrate; introducing an image of a test pattern into the electron beam sensitive resist material; developing the image of said test pattern; and determining the dose height and the clearing dose for said test pattern in the electron beam sensitive resist material.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said exposure dose profile is defined by the Gaussian equation, ##EQU2## where P(x') is the short range scatter distribution function for the incident dose of radiation introduced at position r and σ f is the short range scatter width for the incident dose of radiation.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
101 words
The method of claim 3, wherein the incident dose of radiation is determined from, D r (r)=kD i (r)+∫d 2 r'D i (r')P b (|r-r'|), where D r (r) is the clearing dose for the electron beam sensitive resist material, D i (r) is the incident dose of radiation introduced at position r, the integral ∫d 2 r'D i (r')ρ b (|r-r'|) is the sum of the doses of radiation received at position r from adjacent positions r' due to backscattering ρ b is the backscatter spreading function, and k is the correction for the short range scatter of the radiation.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 4, wherein k is within the range 0<k<1.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
7 words
The method of claim 4, wherein k=0.5.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the clearing dose is the value on the dose profile that intersects the dose height at the halfway point.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1, wherein each feature is divided into a plurality of subshapes and the incident dose of radiation is adjusted for each edge of said subshape.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-04-06 | 2001-10-06 | 2002-04-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-04-06 | 2005-10-06 | 2006-04-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-04-06 | 2009-10-06 | 2010-04-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |