US5734740A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for automated radiographic quality assurance
Assignee: University of Florida
•
Filing: 1994-10-31
•
Granted: 1998-03-31
•
Expires: 2014-10-31
Abstract
Abstract A method for quantitatively evaluating the quality of radiographic films is disclosed. The method provides for digitizing a radiographic image to form a digital image made up of a plurality of pixels. The individual pixels of the digitized image are assigned grey level values. These grey level values are summed to form a global histogram representing all of the pixels of the digital image. The histogram is subsequently binned and subdivided to form first and second binned histograms. A series of rules is applied to these histograms to evaluate whether the radiographic film is clinically acceptable for use in making a diagnosis.
Inventors
- 👤 Douglas K. Benn
- 👤 Minbo Shim
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 11:00
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/0002; G06T7/0012
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
292 words
A computer implemented method for determining film density quality of a clinical radiographic image on an exposed radiographic film comprising the steps of: exposing a radiographic film to form a radiographic image; digitizing said radiographic image to form a digital image of said radiographic image, said digital image comprising a plurality of pixels; storing said digital image in a memory; assigning a grey level value to each of said plurality of pixels based on a relative darkness of each said pixel; generating a grey level histogram of said digital image based on said assigned grey level values; storing said grey level histogram in a memory; generating at least one binned grey level histogram of said digital image based on said assigned grey level values; storing said at least one binned grey level histogram in a memory; and determining a quality classification of said radiographic image based on an evaluation of said binned grey level histogram of said digital image; wherein the step of generating said at least one binned grey level histogram comprises retrieving said grey level histogram from memory; summing a number of pixels of said digital image having grey level values in a first range, said first range being defined as a dark range; summing a number of pixels of said digital image having grey level values in a second range, said second range being defined as an intermediate range; summing a number of pixels of said digital image having grey level values in a third range, said third range being defined as a light range; said first binned histogram reflecting relative percentages of the numbers of pixels of the digital images in each of said first, second and third ranges; and storing said first binned histogram in a memory.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
292 words
A computer implemented method for determining film density quality of a clinical radiographic image on an exposed radiographic film comprising the steps of: exposing a radiographic film to form a radiographic image; digitizing said radiographic image to form a digital image of said radiographic image, said digital image comprising a plurality of pixels; storing said digital image in a memory; assigning a grey level value to each of said plurality of pixels based on a relative darkness of each said pixel; generating a grey level histogram of said digital image based on said assigned grey level values; storing said grey level histogram in a memory; generating at least one binned grey level histogram of said digital image based on said assigned grey level values; storing said at least one binned grey level histogram in a memory; and determining a quality classification of said radiographic image based on an evaluation of said binned grey level histogram of said digital image; wherein the step of generating said at least one binned grey level histogram comprises retrieving said grey level histogram from memory; summing a number of pixels of said digital image having grey level values in a first range, said first range being defined as a dark range; summing a number of pixels of said digital image having grey level values in a second range, said second range being defined as an intermediate range; summing a number of pixels of said digital image having grey level values in a third range, said third range being defined as a light range; said first binned histogram reflecting relative percentages of the numbers of pixels of the digital images in each of said first, second and third ranges; and storing said first binned histogram in a memory.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said grey level values are in the range of 0 to 255, 0 being a darkest grey level and 255 being a lightest grey level.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
81 words
The method of claim 1, comprising the further steps of: retrieving said digital image from memory; dividing said digital image into three regions, each region being approximately one-third of the digital image and each of the three regions being independent of each other; assigning grey level values to each of said plurality of pixels; generating a grey level histogram for each of said three independent regions; and storing said grey level histogram of each said three independent regions in a memory.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
168 words
The method of claim 3, further comprising the step of binning the grey level histograms of each of the three regions to form a second binned grey level histogram comprising a binned grey level histogram for each said region, wherein the step of binning comprises: retrieving said grey level histogram for each said three independent regions from said memory; summing a number of pixels of a given region of said digital image having grey level values in said first range; summing a number of pixels in a given region of said digital image having grey level values in said second range; summing a number of pixels in a given region of said digital image having grey level values in said third range; repeating said summing steps for each of said three independent regions; generating a second binned histogram for each said region, wherein said binned histogram reflects relative percentages of said first, second and third ranges in each region; and storing said second binned histogram in a memory.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
107 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said step of determining quality classification of said radiographic image comprises: retrieving said first and second binned histograms from memory; comparing the relative percentage of said first, second and third ranges in said first binned histogram and comparing the relative percentages of said first, second and third ranges in each of the three regions of said second binned histogram in accordance with predetermined rules, said rules comprising at least one of a first rule, a complex dark rule and a complex light rule; and determining the quality classification based on a result of applying said predetermined rules to said binned histogram.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
298 words
The method of claim 5, wherein applying said rules comprises: applying said first rule to said first binned histogram, said first rule comprising: classifying the quality of said radiographic image as acceptable when a percentage of pixels in said first range is less than 65% and a percentage of pixels in said third range is less than 65%; applying said complex dark rule to said second binned histogram to determine if the quality of said radiographic image is acceptable or too dark when a percentage of pixels of said first binned histogram in said first range is greater than 65% in each region, said complex dark rule comprising: classifying the quality of said radiographic image as acceptable if the percentage of pixels in the first range is less than 65% in any of the three regions; classifying the quality of the radiographic image as too dark if the percentage of pixels in the first range is not less than 65% in each of the three regions; and applying said complex light rule to said second binned histogram to determine if the quality of said radiographic image is acceptable or too light when the percentage of pixels in the third range of said first binned histogram is greater than 65%, said complex light rule comprising: classifying the quality of the radiographic image as too light when the percentage of pixels in the third range is greater than 65% in all three regions; classifying the quality of the radiographic image as too light when the percentage of pixels in the third range is greater than 70% in two of the three regions and greater than 50% in a remaining region; and classifying the quality of the radiographic image as acceptable if it has not been determined to be too light.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 1, wherein: said first range is defined as a range of grey level values from 0 to 85; said second range is defined as a range of grey level values from 86 to 170; and said third range is defined as a range of grey level values from 171 to 255.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4239395A
Cited
US4453226A
Cited
US4467351A
Cited
US4550422A
Cited
US4950894A
Cited
US4896278A
Cited
US5225979A
Cited
US5077768A
Cited
US5537483A
Cited
US5218625A
Cited
US5157455A
Cited
US5369572A
Cited
US5224177A
Cited
US5297550A
Cited
US5450502A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-03-30 | 2001-09-29 | 2002-03-31 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-03-30 | 2005-09-29 | 2006-03-31 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-03-30 | 2009-09-29 | 2010-03-31 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |