Patent US5694540A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5694540A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Automated software regression test and compilation system
Assignee: Nokia of America Corp
•
Filing: 1996-01-16
•
Granted: 1997-12-02
•
Expires: 2016-01-16
Abstract
Abstract The regression testing of a recompiled main software program is provided a facility which performs a limited regression test that has the same level of testing as if the main program were tested using an expanded regression test that tests virtually all of the software modules forming the program. More particularly, if an error is found in the main program it is documented in a modification request which a programmer thereafter uses to track down and identify the software module(s) that needs to be modified to deal with the error. At that point, the programmer modifies the identified software module and also designs a current test program to test the recompiled program to determine if the error has been corrected and that the modification does not affect some other aspect of the program. The modified module and test program are then associated with an identifier identifying the associated modification request. The facility then locates all modification request identifiers respectively associated with prior modification made to the identified software module and executes the test programs associated with those modifiers as well as the current test program against the recompiled version of the main program.
Inventors
- 👤 James E. Humelsine
- 👤 Moses M. Ling
- 👤 Carl H. Olson, III
- 👤 Pramod Warty
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 14:30
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/36; G06F11/3668; G06F11/3672; G06F11/3688; G06F8/00; G06F8/70; G06F8/71
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
179 words
A method of performing a regression test of a recompiled program formed from a plurality of software modules, said method comprising the steps of associating a software error found in said program with a modification request and associating said modification request with a respective identifier, responsive to associating said error with at least one of said software modules, (a) changing said one software module to correct said error, (b) designing a current test program to test said one software module to verify that the error contained therein has been corrected and (c) associating said current test program and said changed software module with said identifier, said one software module being associated with prior changes associated with respective identifiers and respective test programs, recompiling said program using said changed one software module and the other ones of said plurality of software modules, determining all modification request identifiers respectively associated with prior changes made to said one software module and executing the test programs respectively associated with such prior identifiers as well as the current test program against said recompiled program.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
179 words
A method of performing a regression test of a recompiled program formed from a plurality of software modules, said method comprising the steps of associating a software error found in said program with a modification request and associating said modification request with a respective identifier, responsive to associating said error with at least one of said software modules, (a) changing said one software module to correct said error, (b) designing a current test program to test said one software module to verify that the error contained therein has been corrected and (c) associating said current test program and said changed software module with said identifier, said one software module being associated with prior changes associated with respective identifiers and respective test programs, recompiling said program using said changed one software module and the other ones of said plurality of software modules, determining all modification request identifiers respectively associated with prior changes made to said one software module and executing the test programs respectively associated with such prior identifiers as well as the current test program against said recompiled program.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of executing includes the step of automatically executing said test programs in the order that they were created.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of executing includes the step of storing the results of each test program in a memory file and supplying said file to a user.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the step of storing includes the step of analyzing said results and storing the results of such analysis in said file.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said analysis includes identifying which tests of said test program passed or failed.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of determining a transitive closure of test dependencies for each of said test programs that is executed.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
194 words
A method of performing a regression test of a recompiled program formed from a plurality of software modules, said method comprising the steps of documenting software errors found in said program in respective modification requests and associating said modification requests with respective identifiers, identifying the software modules respectively containing said errors as a function of the documentation contained in the respective modification requests, responsive to each said identification, (a) changing the associated identified software module to correct the error contained therein, (b) designing a current test program to test the software module after it has been changed to verify that the error contained therein has been corrected and (c) associating said test and said changed software module with the identifier associated with the modification request used to identify the error, recompiling said program using said software modules which have been changed and those of said plurality of software modules which did not change, determining all modification request identifiers respectively associated with prior changes made to each of said identified software modules and executing only the test programs respectively associated with such prior identifiers as well as each current test program against said recompiled program.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
194 words
A method of performing a regression test of a recompiled program formed from a plurality of software modules, said method comprising the steps of documenting software errors found in said program in respective modification requests and associating said modification requests with respective identifiers, identifying the software modules respectively containing said errors as a function of the documentation contained in the respective modification requests, responsive to each said identification, (a) changing the associated identified software module to correct the error contained therein, (b) designing a current test program to test the software module after it has been changed to verify that the error contained therein has been corrected and (c) associating said test and said changed software module with the identifier associated with the modification request used to identify the error, recompiling said program using said software modules which have been changed and those of said plurality of software modules which did not change, determining all modification request identifiers respectively associated with prior changes made to each of said identified software modules and executing only the test programs respectively associated with such prior identifiers as well as each current test program against said recompiled program.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 7 wherein the step of executing includes the steps of identifying prior test programs associated with a changed software module, and automatically executing the identified test programs based on the order in which their associated identifiers were created and then executing the associated current test program.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 7 wherein the step of executing includes the step of storing the results obtained from executing a test program in a memory file and supplying said file to a user.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the step of storing includes the step of analyzing said results and storing the results of such analysis in said file.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 10 wherein said analysis includes identifying which tests of said test program passed of failed.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
181 words
A system for regression testing a recompiled program formed from a plurality of software modules, said system comprising means, responsive to identifying a software error in said program, for documenting said software error in a modification request and associating said modification request with a respective identifier, means, responsive to such documentation, for associating said error with at least one of said software modules, means, operative as a result of said associating for (a) modifying said one software module to correct said error, (b) designing a current test program to test said modified software module to verify that the error contained therein has been corrected and (c) associating said current test program and said changed software module with said identifier, means for recompiling said program using said changed modified software module and the other ones of said plurality of software modules, and means for determining all modification request identifiers respectively associated with prior modifications made to said modified software module and executing the test programs respectively associated with such prior identifiers as well as the current test program against said recompiled program.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
181 words
A system for regression testing a recompiled program formed from a plurality of software modules, said system comprising means, responsive to identifying a software error in said program, for documenting said software error in a modification request and associating said modification request with a respective identifier, means, responsive to such documentation, for associating said error with at least one of said software modules, means, operative as a result of said associating for (a) modifying said one software module to correct said error, (b) designing a current test program to test said modified software module to verify that the error contained therein has been corrected and (c) associating said current test program and said changed software module with said identifier, means for recompiling said program using said changed modified software module and the other ones of said plurality of software modules, and means for determining all modification request identifiers respectively associated with prior modifications made to said modified software module and executing the test programs respectively associated with such prior identifiers as well as the current test program against said recompiled program.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
27 words
The system set forth in claim 12 wherein said means for executing includes means for automatically executing said test programs in the order that they were created.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
33 words
The system set forth in claim 12 wherein said means for executing includes means for storing the results of each test program in a memory file and supplying said file to a user.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
28 words
The system set forth in claim 14 wherein said means for storing includes means for analyzing said results and storing the results of such analysis in said file.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
21 words
The system set forth in claim 15 wherein said analysis includes identifying which tests of said test program passed or failed.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
25 words
The system set forth in claim 12 further comprising means for determining a trasitive closure of test dependencies for each of said executed test programs.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-12-01 | 2001-06-02 | 2001-12-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-12-01 | 2005-06-02 | 2005-12-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-12-01 | 2009-06-02 | 2009-12-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |