US5680350A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for narrowing threshold voltage distribution in a block erased flash memory array
Assignee: Round Rock Research LLC
•
Filing: 1994-12-14
•
Granted: 1997-10-21
•
Expires: 2014-12-14
Abstract
Abstract This invention constitutes a method for narrowing threshold voltage distribution among the individual cells of a block erased flash memory array by firstly, preprogramming cells within the block be erased to a level of saturation using hot electron injection to drive a surplus of electrons into the floating gate of each cell; secondly, subjecting all cells with the block to a first erase pulse which causes the surplus electrons within the floating gate of each cell to be driven into the cell's source region via Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, with the erase pulse being of sufficient length to erase every cell within the block; thirdly, subjecting all cells within the block to a word line stress step or a soft programming step, by means of which some electrons are driven back into the floating gate of each cell via Fowler-Nordheim tunneling or hot electron injection, respectively; and, fourthly, subjecting all cells within the block to a second erase pulse, the second erase pulse being at least an order of magnitude shorter than the first erase pulse. Use of the second erase pulse following the word line stress step not only shifts the threshold voltage distribution to a somewhat lower level, but also compresses the distribution. Since compression on the high side of the curve is greater than on the low side, the length of the second erase pulse can be tailored to fit the characteristics of a particular flash memory.
Inventors
- 👤 Roger R. Lee
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 02:06
CPC Classifications
G; G11; G11C; G11C16/00; G11C16/02; G11C16/06; G11C16/34; G11C16/3404; G11C16/3409; G11C16/10; G11C16/14; G11C16/16
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
169 words
A method for erasing a block of flash memory cells, each cell comprising a field-effect transistor having a control gate, a floating gate, a source region coupled to a source line, a drain region coupled to a digit line, and a channel region coupling said source and drain regions, said method comprising the following sequence of steps: (a) preprogramming all cells within the block to be erased using hot electron injection to drive a surplus of electrons into the floating gate of each cell; (b) subjecting all cells within the block to a first erase pulse which causes the surplus electrons within the floating gate of each cell to be driven into the cell's source region via Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, the erase pulse being of sufficient length to erase every cell within the block; (c) driving some electrons back into the floating gate of each cell; and (d) subjecting all cells within the block to a second erase pulse, the second erase pulse being shorter than the first erase pulse.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
169 words
A method for erasing a block of flash memory cells, each cell comprising a field-effect transistor having a control gate, a floating gate, a source region coupled to a source line, a drain region coupled to a digit line, and a channel region coupling said source and drain regions, said method comprising the following sequence of steps: (a) preprogramming all cells within the block to be erased using hot electron injection to drive a surplus of electrons into the floating gate of each cell; (b) subjecting all cells within the block to a first erase pulse which causes the surplus electrons within the floating gate of each cell to be driven into the cell's source region via Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, the erase pulse being of sufficient length to erase every cell within the block; (c) driving some electrons back into the floating gate of each cell; and (d) subjecting all cells within the block to a second erase pulse, the second erase pulse being shorter than the first erase pulse.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
The process of claim 1, wherein some electrons are driven back into the floating gate of each cell in step (c) via Fowler-Nordheim tunneling effected by a word line stress step.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
31 words
The process of claim 1, wherein some electrons are driven back into the floating gate of each cell in step (c) via hot electron injection effected by a soft programming step.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 1, wherein hot electron injection associated with step (a) is allowed to continue until the floating gates all cells within the block reach a surplus electron saturation level for the employed preprogramming voltage.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 4, wherein compression effected by the second erase pulse is greater on the high side of the threshold voltage distribution than on the lower side.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said second erase pulse length is at least an order of magnitude shorter than said first erase pulse.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the second erase pulse results in a compression of the threshold voltage distribution, and in a shifting of average threshold voltage to a lower value.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
58 words
An method for narrowing threshold voltage distribution among the individual cells in a block of flash memory cells which have undergone a preprogramming step, a subsequent first erase step, and a word line stress step following the first erase step, wherein the method comprises the step of performing a second erase step following the word line stress step.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
58 words
An method for narrowing threshold voltage distribution among the individual cells in a block of flash memory cells which have undergone a preprogramming step, a subsequent first erase step, and a word line stress step following the first erase step, wherein the method comprises the step of performing a second erase step following the word line stress step.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 8, wherein the second erase step is of a duration that is at least an order of magnitude shorter than the duration of the first erase step.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 8, wherein the second erase step effects a compression of the threshold voltage distribution and a shifting of average threshold voltage to a lower value.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 10, wherein compression effected by the second erase step is greater on the high side of the threshold voltage distribution than on the lower side.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
56 words
An method for narrowing threshold voltage distribution among the individual cells in a block of flash memory cells which have undergone a preprogramming step, a subsequent first erase step, and a soft programming step following the first erase step, wherein the method comprises the step of performing a second erase step following the soft programming step.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
56 words
An method for narrowing threshold voltage distribution among the individual cells in a block of flash memory cells which have undergone a preprogramming step, a subsequent first erase step, and a soft programming step following the first erase step, wherein the method comprises the step of performing a second erase step following the soft programming step.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 12, wherein the second erase step is of a duration that is at least an order of magnitude shorter than the: duration of the first erase step.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 8, wherein the second erase step effects a compression of the threshold voltage distribution and a shifting of average threshold voltage to a lower value.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 14, wherein compression effected by the second erase step is greater on the high side of the threshold voltage distribution than on the lower side.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-10-20 | 2001-04-21 | 2001-10-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-10-20 | 2005-04-21 | 2005-10-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-10-20 | 2009-04-21 | 2009-10-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |