Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
88 words
A signal processing method for use with multi-pass and multi-channel interferometric synthetic aperture radar systems, said method comprising the steps of: performing a process on raw synthetic aperture radar data to produce a plurality of synthetic aperture radar images therefrom; performing a process on the synthetic aperture radar images to produce a plurality of linear phase matched synthetic aperture radar images and predetermined processing parameters; and performing a process on the plurality of linear phase matched synthetic aperture radar images to produce a synthetic aperture radar elevation map.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
88 words
A signal processing method for use with multi-pass and multi-channel interferometric synthetic aperture radar systems, said method comprising the steps of: performing a process on raw synthetic aperture radar data to produce a plurality of synthetic aperture radar images therefrom; performing a process on the synthetic aperture radar images to produce a plurality of linear phase matched synthetic aperture radar images and predetermined processing parameters; and performing a process on the plurality of linear phase matched synthetic aperture radar images to produce a synthetic aperture radar elevation map.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of performing a process on the raw synthetic aperture radar data to produce a plurality of synthetic aperture radar images comprises the steps of: compensating for relative motion between each of the plurality of images; converting the plurality of images into ground plane polar format; compressing range data associated with each of the images; and registering each of the images to each other.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
108 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of performing a process on the synthetic aperture radar images to produce a plurality of linear phase matched synthetic aperture radar images comprises the steps of: matching noise power contained in each of the images to normalize the images to compensate for differences in gain of the systems from scan to scan; matching linear phase values of each of the images to correct for phase differences by estimating phase matching parameters for each of the images; estimating a phase-difference scale factor for each of the images; and ordering each of the images in terms of increasing phase difference scale factors.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the step of matching linear phase values of each of the images comprises the steps of: computing a pairwise interferogram for adjacent images; summing sample-pair products of the interferogram to estimate the linear phase thereof; and computing the phase of the summed sample-pair products.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 3 which further comprises the step of: applying a soft limiter to a magnitude component of the interferograms before the above summations are performed, preventing a few very large magnitude samples from dominating the estimate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the step of summing sample-pair products comprises the step of: computing a magnitude-weighted median phase.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the step of ordering each of the images comprises the steps of: finding an image-pair having the smallest phase-difference scale factor; adding an image that results in the smallest increase in total elevation aperture is added to this list of image pairs; and repeating the above two steps until no more images remain.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of performing a process on the plurality of linear phase matched synthetic aperture radar images to produce a synthetic aperture radar elevation map further comprises the step of: performing a process on the plurality of linear phase matched synthetic aperture radar images to produce an elevation quality map.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
80 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of performing a process on the plurality of linear phase matched complex synthetic aperture radar images to produce a synthetic aperture radar elevation map comprises the steps of: computing an initial elevation map based on one image-pair and computing average signal power; estimating additive phase correction values for each of the linear phase matched images; and estimating elevation values for each of the linear phase matched images to produce the elevation map.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the step of computing comprises the steps of: estimating additive-phase corrections and elevation values; calculating an initial elevation map using an image-pair having the shortest phase-difference scale factor; and computing a sample-by-sample average of the magnitude of the gain-matched images to compute the step size for elevation estimation and to compute elevation accuracy or quality.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the step of estimating additive phase correction values comprises the steps of: estimating additive-phase corrections that represent an unknown phase error that is constant throughout each image but varies from image to image by calculating the average image value after correcting for the current elevation estimate; and calculating the resulting average residual phase.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 11 wherein the step of estimating elevation values comprises the step of: computing a maximum-likelihood estimate of elevation given the image and phase corrections.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
75 words
The method of claim 12 wherein the step of computing a maximum-likelihood estimate of elevation values comprises the steps of: estimating a lower-bound of elevation accuracy derived from a Cramer-Rao lower bound; calculating a step size for elevation estimation; estimating the elevation value by calculating an elevation that maximizes a log-likelihood function; saving the maximum sampled value and corresponding argument to provide a maximum likelihood estimate of elevation; and saving the elevation and accuracy estimates.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
118 words
The method of claim 12 wherein the step of computing a maximum-likelihood estimate of elevation values comprises the steps of: computing 51 an elevation accuracy lower bound and search-step size; calculating 52 complex image weights; calculating 53 a coherent weighted sum; computing 54 the magnitude of the calculated summation; testing 55 for a maximum and saving the elevation and magnitude values; computing 56 the next elevation value by incrementing the elevation value using the previously computed step size; testing 57 the incremented elevation value to determine whether it is within elevation search limits, and repeating all but the first step above if the stopping criterion is not met; and interpolating 58 the elevation estimate to further refine it.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 14 wherein the computing step 51 comprises the step of calculating a theoretical lower bound on elevation error variance derived from average image magnitude, noise power, and phase-difference scale factors.