Patent US5674256A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5674256A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Cardiac pre-ejection period detection
Assignee: Cardiac Pacemakers Inc
•
Filing: 1995-12-19
•
Granted: 1997-10-07
•
Expires: 2015-12-19
Abstract
Abstract A method of and apparatus for controlling a rate adaptive pacer is disclosed which operates based on the pre-ejection period (PEP), the method including the step of detecting the pre-ejection period utilizing only the pacer ECG signal and an accelerometer transducer signal.
Inventors
- 👤 Gerrard M. Carlson
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-10 01:57
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61N; A61N1/00; A61N1/18; A61N1/32; A61N1/36; A61N1/362; A61N1/365; A61N1/36514; A61N1/36542
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
134 words
A method of determining the pre-ejection period (PEP) for use in controlling a rate adaptive pacer based on the PEP measured during an on-going cardiac beat and using accelerometer sensor signals and electrocardiogram (ECG) signals, the method comprising the steps of (a) providing an accelerometer trace signal of cardiac activity; (b) detecting the peak of the R wave of the ECG signal; and (c) measuring the PEP of an on-going cardiac beat as the time difference between the peak of the R wave of the ECG signal which gives rise to ejection during said on-going cardiac beat and a time defined as the time of minimum prediction error which is the time of best autoregressive (AR) match of the accelerometer trace to that of a predetermined model accelerometer transducer signal evaluated during baseline conditions.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
134 words
A method of determining the pre-ejection period (PEP) for use in controlling a rate adaptive pacer based on the PEP measured during an on-going cardiac beat and using accelerometer sensor signals and electrocardiogram (ECG) signals, the method comprising the steps of (a) providing an accelerometer trace signal of cardiac activity; (b) detecting the peak of the R wave of the ECG signal; and (c) measuring the PEP of an on-going cardiac beat as the time difference between the peak of the R wave of the ECG signal which gives rise to ejection during said on-going cardiac beat and a time defined as the time of minimum prediction error which is the time of best autoregressive (AR) match of the accelerometer trace to that of a predetermined model accelerometer transducer signal evaluated during baseline conditions.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 1 wherein an allowable time to determine the time of best AR match is confined to a time window that begins with the peak of the R wave, which gives rise to ejection during said on-going cardiac beat, and ends with the end of a main lobe of the RMS-PEP waveform corresponding to said beat.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
192 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of: (a) preconditioning the accelerometer signal; (b) processing a first segment of the preconditioned accelerometer signal of (a) by algorithms selected from the group consisting of Levinson and Yule-Walker from autocorrelation lags of the accelerometer signal derived during the time of a main lobe of the RMS-PEP waveform; (c) subjecting the output of the processed signal of (b) to an inverse filter; (d) extracting the output of the inverse filter as an absolute value; (e) processing a second segment of the preconditioned accelerometer signal of (a) to produce a running RMS estimate of the accelerometer signal; (f) scaling the absolute value of the output of the inverse filter by the running RMS estimate of the accelerometer signal during the main lobe of the RMS-PEP waveform to produce a scaled signal; (g) using a peak detector to detect the peak absolute value of the scaled signal in (f) to determine the time of minimum prediction error, which is the time of best AR match; and (h) subtracting the time of the R wave peak from the time of best AR match to obtain PEP.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the step of subjecting the output of the processed signal of (b) to an inverse filter includes subjecting same to an FIR lattice filter.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 3 wherein an allowable time to determine the time of best AR match is confined to a time window that begins with the peak of the R wave, which gives rise to ejection during said on-going cardiac beat, and ends with the end of a main lobe of the RMS-PEP waveform corresponding to said beat.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the step of preconditioning the accelerometer signal further comprises the steps of (a) subjecting the accelerometer signal to a low pass filter; (b) extracting the first derrivative of the output of the low pass filter; and (c) digitizing the signal using an A-to-D converter.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
247 words
In a cardiac pre-ejection period detector for use in controlling a rate adaptive pacer based on the pre-ejection period (PEP) said pacer having an ECG signal detector including an R wave peak detector means and an associated accelerometer transducer having an output signal: (a) means for preconditioning the accelerometer output signal; (b) means for processing a first segment of the preconditioned accelerometer output signal of (a) to produce a running RMS-PEP waveform of the accelerometer output signal; (c) means for processing a second segment of the preconditioned accelerometer output signal of (a) using algorithms selected from the group consisting of Levinson and Yule-Walker from autocorrelation lags of the accelerometer signal derived during the time of a main lobe of the RMS-PEP signal to produce an auto-regressive (AR) signal output; (d) inverse filter means for processing said AR signal output and producing an inverse filter output signal; (e) means for producing an absolute value signal from the inverse filter output signal; (f) multiplying means for scaling the absolute value of the output of the inverse filter by the running RMS-PEP waveform of the accelerometer signal during the main lobe of the RMS-PEP waveform; (g) detector means to detect the peak absolute value of the scaled inverse filter output signal to determine the time of minimum prediction error which is the best AR match; and (h) means for subtracting the time of the peak of the R wave from the time of the best AR match to obtain PEP.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
247 words
In a cardiac pre-ejection period detector for use in controlling a rate adaptive pacer based on the pre-ejection period (PEP) said pacer having an ECG signal detector including an R wave peak detector means and an associated accelerometer transducer having an output signal: (a) means for preconditioning the accelerometer output signal; (b) means for processing a first segment of the preconditioned accelerometer output signal of (a) to produce a running RMS-PEP waveform of the accelerometer output signal; (c) means for processing a second segment of the preconditioned accelerometer output signal of (a) using algorithms selected from the group consisting of Levinson and Yule-Walker from autocorrelation lags of the accelerometer signal derived during the time of a main lobe of the RMS-PEP signal to produce an auto-regressive (AR) signal output; (d) inverse filter means for processing said AR signal output and producing an inverse filter output signal; (e) means for producing an absolute value signal from the inverse filter output signal; (f) multiplying means for scaling the absolute value of the output of the inverse filter by the running RMS-PEP waveform of the accelerometer signal during the main lobe of the RMS-PEP waveform; (g) detector means to detect the peak absolute value of the scaled inverse filter output signal to determine the time of minimum prediction error which is the best AR match; and (h) means for subtracting the time of the peak of the R wave from the time of the best AR match to obtain PEP.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 7 wherein said inverse filter is an FIR lattice filter.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4730619A
Cited
US4719921A
Cited
US4773401A
Cited
US4865036A
Cited
US5156142A
Cited
US5549650A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-10-06 | 2001-04-07 | 2001-10-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-10-06 | 2005-04-07 | 2005-10-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-10-06 | 2009-04-07 | 2009-10-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |