Patent US1987422A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US2048223A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US5647663A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5647663A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Radiation treatment planning method and apparatus
Assignee: ADVANTAGE CAPITAL WISCONSIN PARTNERS I LP
•
Filing: 1996-01-05
•
Granted: 1997-07-15
•
Expires: 2016-01-05
Abstract
Abstract A method of radiation treatment planning for radiation systems providing multiple beams of independently adjustable intensities limits the iterative beam weight determination to a set of discrete beam weights avoiding errors in post-optimization truncation of the beam weights, and decreasing the iteration time. Those beams having a greatest effect on the solution are preferentially adjusted and larger changes between discrete values of beam weights are given preference to smaller changes.
Inventors
- 👤 Timothy W. Holmes
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 19:04
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61N; A61N5/00; A61N5/10; A61N5/103; A61N5/1031; G; G16; G16H; G16H20/00; G16H20/40; G16Z; G16Z99/00; G16H40/00; G16H40/60; G16H40/63; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S128/00; Y10S128/92; Y10S128/922
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
199 words
A method of planning radiation treatment of a treatment volume of a patient using a radiation therapy machine generating a plurality of radiation beams to be directed through different parts of the volume, the beams having independently controllable intensities, the method comprising the steps of: operating an electronic computer according to a stored program to: 1) pre-compute a standard dose map for a plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume for each beam, under the assumption that the beams have a predetermined normal beam intensity; 2) receive from a user an objective function indicating a desired distribution of dose the plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume; 3) scale the standard dose map for each beam by a current weight for that beam and sum the scaled standard dose maps together to produced a computed dose map; 4) evaluate the computed dose according to the objective function; 5) adjust the current weight of at least one beam according to the evaluation of step (4) and repeat steps (3) through (5) until the value of the objective has stabilized; and 6) at the conclusion of step (5) output the adjusted current beam weights as a radiation treatment plan.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
199 words
A method of planning radiation treatment of a treatment volume of a patient using a radiation therapy machine generating a plurality of radiation beams to be directed through different parts of the volume, the beams having independently controllable intensities, the method comprising the steps of: operating an electronic computer according to a stored program to: 1) pre-compute a standard dose map for a plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume for each beam, under the assumption that the beams have a predetermined normal beam intensity; 2) receive from a user an objective function indicating a desired distribution of dose the plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume; 3) scale the standard dose map for each beam by a current weight for that beam and sum the scaled standard dose maps together to produced a computed dose map; 4) evaluate the computed dose according to the objective function; 5) adjust the current weight of at least one beam according to the evaluation of step (4) and repeat steps (3) through (5) until the value of the objective has stabilized; and 6) at the conclusion of step (5) output the adjusted current beam weights as a radiation treatment plan.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 1 wherein step (1) includes the steps of: (i) reading computed tomography data indicating the tissue characteristics in the volume; (ii) computing scatter of the beam caused by the tissue characteristics in the volume in determining the standard dose maps.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the objective function is the least squared error between a computed dose distribution and a desired dose distribution.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
169 words
A method of planning radiation treatment of a treatment volume, of a patient using a radiation therapy machine generating a plurality of radiation beams to be directed through different parts of the volume, the beams having independently controllable intensities, the method comprising the steps of: operating an electronic computer according to a stored program to: 1) receive from a user a limited set of discrete intensity values to which each beam will conform; 2) receive from a user an objective function indicating a desired distribution of dose in the plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume; 3) compute from a current weight for each beam, a computed dose map; 4) evaluate the computed dose according to the objective function; 5) adjust the current weights of the beams according to the evaluation of step (4) to different ones of the discrete intensity values and repeat steps (3) through (5) until the value of the objective has stabilized; and 6) output the adjusted beam weights as a radiation treatment plan.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
169 words
A method of planning radiation treatment of a treatment volume, of a patient using a radiation therapy machine generating a plurality of radiation beams to be directed through different parts of the volume, the beams having independently controllable intensities, the method comprising the steps of: operating an electronic computer according to a stored program to: 1) receive from a user a limited set of discrete intensity values to which each beam will conform; 2) receive from a user an objective function indicating a desired distribution of dose in the plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume; 3) compute from a current weight for each beam, a computed dose map; 4) evaluate the computed dose according to the objective function; 5) adjust the current weights of the beams according to the evaluation of step (4) to different ones of the discrete intensity values and repeat steps (3) through (5) until the value of the objective has stabilized; and 6) output the adjusted beam weights as a radiation treatment plan.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 4 wherein step (5) includes the steps of: (i) determining a gradient of the objective function with respect to beam weights; (ii) identifying from the gradient at least one beam having the greatest effect on the objective function; and (iii) preferentially adjusting the weight of the beam determined in step (ii).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 4 wherein step (5) preferentially adjusts the current weights among discrete intensity values that cause greater change in the beam weight.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
74 words
The method of claim 4 wherein step (3) includes the steps of: (i) pre-computing a standard dose map for a plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume for each beam under the assumption that the beams have a predetermined normal beam intensity; and (ii) scaling the standard dose map for each beam by the current weight for that beam and summing the scaled standard dose maps together to produce a computed dose map.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 4 wherein step (5) includes the steps of: (i) representing the current weights as binary numbers having a limited number of bits; and (ii) toggling the state of a selected bit in a selected binary number.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the selected bit is determined by choosing a random number between 0 and 2 n -1, n being an integer where 2 n equals the limited set of discrete intensity values and selecting the bit equal to the highest bit in the binary representation of the random number; whereby higher order bits are preferentially toggled.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 4 wherein step (5) determines a gradient of the objective function with respect to beam weights and uses the gradient to preferentially adjust the weights of beams having the greatest effect on the objective function.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
190 words
A radiation treatment system comprising: a radiation source generating a plurality of radiation beams to be directed through different parts of a treatment volume, the beams having independently controllable intensities according to a control signal; and an electronic computer according to a stored program to: 1) pre-compute a standard dose map for a plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume for each beam, under the assumption that the beams have a predetermined normal beam intensity; 2) receive from a user an objective function indicating a desired distribution of dose in the plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume; 3) scale the standard dose map for each beam by a current weight for that beam and sum the scaled standard dose maps together to produce a computed dose map; 4) evaluate the computed dose according to the objective function; 5) adjust the current weight of at least one beam according to the evaluation of step (4) and repeat steps (3) through (5) until the value of the objective has stabilized; and 6) at the conclusion of step (5) output the adjusted current beam weights as a radiation treatment plan.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
190 words
A radiation treatment system comprising: a radiation source generating a plurality of radiation beams to be directed through different parts of a treatment volume, the beams having independently controllable intensities according to a control signal; and an electronic computer according to a stored program to: 1) pre-compute a standard dose map for a plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume for each beam, under the assumption that the beams have a predetermined normal beam intensity; 2) receive from a user an objective function indicating a desired distribution of dose in the plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume; 3) scale the standard dose map for each beam by a current weight for that beam and sum the scaled standard dose maps together to produce a computed dose map; 4) evaluate the computed dose according to the objective function; 5) adjust the current weight of at least one beam according to the evaluation of step (4) and repeat steps (3) through (5) until the value of the objective has stabilized; and 6) at the conclusion of step (5) output the adjusted current beam weights as a radiation treatment plan.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
158 words
A radiation treatment system comprising: a radiation source generating a plurality of radiation beams to be directed through different parts of a treatment volume, the beams having independently controllable intensities according to control signal; and an electronic computer according to a stored program to: 1) receive from a user a limited set of discrete intensity values to which each beam will conform; 2) receive from a user an objective function indicating a desired distribution of dose in the plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume; 3) compute from a current weight for each beam, a computed dose map; 4) evaluate the computed dose according to the objective function; 5) adjust the current weights of the beams according to the comparison of step (4) to different ones of the discrete intensity values and repeat steps (3) through (5) until the value of the objective has stabilized; and 6) output the adjusted beam weights as a radiation treatment plan.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
158 words
A radiation treatment system comprising: a radiation source generating a plurality of radiation beams to be directed through different parts of a treatment volume, the beams having independently controllable intensities according to control signal; and an electronic computer according to a stored program to: 1) receive from a user a limited set of discrete intensity values to which each beam will conform; 2) receive from a user an objective function indicating a desired distribution of dose in the plurality of volume elements within the treatment volume; 3) compute from a current weight for each beam, a computed dose map; 4) evaluate the computed dose according to the objective function; 5) adjust the current weights of the beams according to the comparison of step (4) to different ones of the discrete intensity values and repeat steps (3) through (5) until the value of the objective has stabilized; and 6) output the adjusted beam weights as a radiation treatment plan.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3206893A
Cited
US3871579A
Cited
US3987281A
Cited
US4729099A
Cited
US5205289A
Cited
US5291404A
Cited
US5373844A
Cited
US5418827A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-07-14 | 2001-01-13 | 2001-07-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-07-14 | 2005-01-13 | 2005-07-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-07-14 | 2009-01-13 | 2009-07-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |