Patent US5636020A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5636020A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Zone analysis system and method for optimizing the performance of an inspection system for determining disparity between two surfaces
Assignee: Nokia of America Corp
•
Filing: 1995-04-27
•
Granted: 1997-06-03
•
Expires: 2015-04-27
Abstract
Abstract A zone analysis system and method (211) optimize speed and minimize adverse effects resulting from noise in an inspection system (90) for measuring disparity between two surfaces. In particular, the zone analysis system and method (211) can be implemented in an inspection system (90) for contactlessly measuring undercut or protrusion of an optical fiber (26) relative to a surrounding support material (36) at the endface (79) of an optical fiber termination (37). In structure, the inspection system (90) has a measurement apparatus (91) with an interferometer (98) controlled by a machine vision system (92) for determining the degree of disparity. The inspection system (90) measures an offset of an interferometric fringe (113') produced by the interferometer (98) over the target (82) in the image in order to determine the disparity. Further, the machine vision system (92) employs the zone analysis system and method (211) for optimizing the performance thereof.
Inventors
- 👤 Andrei Csipkes
- 👤 John M. Palmquist
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 11:55
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01B; G01B11/00; G01B11/24
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
143 words
A zone analysis method for optimizing speed and minimizing adverse effects from noise in an inspection system for measuring disparity between first and second surfaces, said first surface surrounding said second surface, the method comprising the steps of: (a) capturing with said inspection system an image of said surfaces with an interferometric fringe superimposed over said image and over said surfaces, said interferometric fringe being a highest gradient fringe of an interferometric pattern produced with white light; and (b) performing automatically with said inspection system the following: (1) defining first and second zones in said image over said first and second surfaces respectively as well as said fringe; (2) arithmetically fitting first and second equations to said fringe in said first and second zones respectively; and (3) determining said disparity between said first and second surfaces based upon said first and second equations.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
143 words
A zone analysis method for optimizing speed and minimizing adverse effects from noise in an inspection system for measuring disparity between first and second surfaces, said first surface surrounding said second surface, the method comprising the steps of: (a) capturing with said inspection system an image of said surfaces with an interferometric fringe superimposed over said image and over said surfaces, said interferometric fringe being a highest gradient fringe of an interferometric pattern produced with white light; and (b) performing automatically with said inspection system the following: (1) defining first and second zones in said image over said first and second surfaces respectively as well as said fringe; (2) arithmetically fitting first and second equations to said fringe in said first and second zones respectively; and (3) determining said disparity between said first and second surfaces based upon said first and second equations.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said disparity corresponds to undercut of an optical fiber relative to a curvature associated with a surrounding material.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said disparity corresponds to protrusion of an optical fiber relative to a curvature associated with a surrounding material.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) comprises the steps of: (1) exposing said surfaces to an interferometer disposed at an angle relative to an axis that is substantially perpendicular to said surfaces; and (2) capturing said image with a camera and associated machine vision system coupled to said interferometer.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1, wherein step (a) comprises the step of moving said interferometric fringe at a desired location in said image by adjusting a displacement of an interferometer relative to said surfaces.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method of claim 1, wherein step (b)(1) comprises the steps of: (i) obtaining a location of a center of said second surface in said image and a diameter of said second surface in said image; and (ii) determining whether said location and said diameter will permit placement of said zones in said image.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
75 words
The method of claim 1, wherein step (b)(1) comprises the steps of: (i) obtaining a location of a center of said second surface in said image and a diameter of said second surface in said image; (ii) calculating positions of two opposing corners of each of said zones based upon said location, said diameter, and a predetermined size corresponding with each said zone; and (iii) defining said zones based upon said positions of said corners.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said first and second equations are circles and wherein step (b)(3) further comprises the step of deriving said disparity by subtracting locations corresponding with said first and second circles at a predefined location over said image representing said second surface.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
176 words
A zone analysis method for optimizing speed and minimizing adverse effects resulting from noise in an inspection system for measuring disparity between first and second surfaces, said first surface surrounding said second surface, the method comprising the following steps that are performed automatically with said inspection system: (a) capturing an image of said surfaces with an interferometric fringe superimposed over said image and over said surfaces; (b) isolating zones in said image for analysis, while discarding regions characterized by noise, by: (1) defining first and fourth zones in said image over said first surface and said fringe on opposing sides of said second surface; and (2) defining second and third zones over said second surface and said fringe on opposing sides of a center of said second surface; (c) arithmetically fitting a first equation to said fringe in said first and fourth zones; (d) arithmetically fitting a second equation to said fringe in said second and third zones; and (e) determining said disparity between said first and second surfaces based upon said first and second equations.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
176 words
A zone analysis method for optimizing speed and minimizing adverse effects resulting from noise in an inspection system for measuring disparity between first and second surfaces, said first surface surrounding said second surface, the method comprising the following steps that are performed automatically with said inspection system: (a) capturing an image of said surfaces with an interferometric fringe superimposed over said image and over said surfaces; (b) isolating zones in said image for analysis, while discarding regions characterized by noise, by: (1) defining first and fourth zones in said image over said first surface and said fringe on opposing sides of said second surface; and (2) defining second and third zones over said second surface and said fringe on opposing sides of a center of said second surface; (c) arithmetically fitting a first equation to said fringe in said first and fourth zones; (d) arithmetically fitting a second equation to said fringe in said second and third zones; and (e) determining said disparity between said first and second surfaces based upon said first and second equations.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
144 words
A zone analysis system for optimizing speed and minimizing adverse effects from noise in an inspection system for measuring disparity between first and second surfaces, said first surface surrounding said second surface, the system comprising: (a) means for capturing with said inspection system an image of said surfaces with an interferometric fringe superimposed over said image and over said surfaces, said interferometric fringe being a highest gradient fringe of an interferometric pattern produced with white light; and (b) means for performing automatically with said inspection system the following: (1) defining first and second zones in said image over said first and second surfaces respectively as well as said fringe; (2) arithmetically fitting first and second equations to said fringe in said first and second zones respectively; and (3) determining said disparity between said first and second surfaces based upon said first and second equations.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
144 words
A zone analysis system for optimizing speed and minimizing adverse effects from noise in an inspection system for measuring disparity between first and second surfaces, said first surface surrounding said second surface, the system comprising: (a) means for capturing with said inspection system an image of said surfaces with an interferometric fringe superimposed over said image and over said surfaces, said interferometric fringe being a highest gradient fringe of an interferometric pattern produced with white light; and (b) means for performing automatically with said inspection system the following: (1) defining first and second zones in said image over said first and second surfaces respectively as well as said fringe; (2) arithmetically fitting first and second equations to said fringe in said first and second zones respectively; and (3) determining said disparity between said first and second surfaces based upon said first and second equations.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
174 words
A zone analysis system for optimizing speed and minimizing adverse effects resulting from noise in an inspection system for measuring disparity between first and second surfaces, said first surface surrounding said second surface, the system comprising: (a) means for capturing an image of said surfaces with an interferometric fringe superimposed over said image and over said surfaces; (b) means for isolating in said image for analysis, while discarding regions characterized by noise, by: (1) defining first and fourth zones in said image over said first surface and said fringe on opposing sides of said second surface; and (2) defining second and third zones over said second surface and said fringe on opposing sides of a center of said second surface; (c) means for arithmetically fitting a first equation to said fringe in said first and fourth zones; (d) means for arithmetically fitting a second equation to said hinge in said second and third zones; and (e) means for determining said disparity between said first and second surfaces based upon said first and second equations.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
174 words
A zone analysis system for optimizing speed and minimizing adverse effects resulting from noise in an inspection system for measuring disparity between first and second surfaces, said first surface surrounding said second surface, the system comprising: (a) means for capturing an image of said surfaces with an interferometric fringe superimposed over said image and over said surfaces; (b) means for isolating in said image for analysis, while discarding regions characterized by noise, by: (1) defining first and fourth zones in said image over said first surface and said fringe on opposing sides of said second surface; and (2) defining second and third zones over said second surface and said fringe on opposing sides of a center of said second surface; (c) means for arithmetically fitting a first equation to said fringe in said first and fourth zones; (d) means for arithmetically fitting a second equation to said hinge in said second and third zones; and (e) means for determining said disparity between said first and second surfaces based upon said first and second equations.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-06-02 | 2000-12-02 | 2001-06-03 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-06-02 | 2004-12-02 | 2005-06-03 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-06-02 | 2008-12-02 | 2009-06-03 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |