US5550845A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for dynamic testing of digital logic circuits
Assignee: Siemens AG
•
Filing: 1991-06-10
•
Granted: 1996-08-27
•
Expires: 2011-06-10
Abstract
Abstract A method for dynamic testing of digital logic circuits includes the application of cyclically-occurring digital signals to the inputs of a logic circuit and identifying anticipated output values in comparison to the inputs. Blank or dummy cycles are introduced after a predetermined number of test cycles, the blank or dummy cycles having the character that modifications no longer appear at the input signals. The predetermined number of test cycles is greater than or equal to 2.
Inventors
- 👤 Karl Traub
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 13:31
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/317; G01R31/3181; G01R31/319; G01R31/3193; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/22; G06F11/2273
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
81 words
A method for dynamic testing of logic circuits, comprising the steps of: (a) applying cyclically-occurring digital signals having a predetermined chronological spacing to inputs of the logic circuit; (b) identifying anticipated values in all cycles at outputs of the logic circuit with respect to its inputs; and (c) after at least two test cycles, introducing dummy cycles to provide a spread of the digital signals such that modifications no longer appear at the inputs to the logical circuits during the spread.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
81 words
A method for dynamic testing of logic circuits, comprising the steps of: (a) applying cyclically-occurring digital signals having a predetermined chronological spacing to inputs of the logic circuit; (b) identifying anticipated values in all cycles at outputs of the logic circuit with respect to its inputs; and (c) after at least two test cycles, introducing dummy cycles to provide a spread of the digital signals such that modifications no longer appear at the inputs to the logical circuits during the spread.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the digital signals have bit patterns and wherein the step (a) of applying cyclically-occurring digital signals is further defined as: (a1) producing a number of test cycles z of an unspread, original bit pattern, where z is a prime number.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
63 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the step (a) of applying cyclically-occurring digital signals is further defined as: producing a number of test cycles z of an unspread, original bit pattern of the digital signals, where z satisfies the relationship z=(n×m)+1, where z is the number of test cycles, n is the number of interconnected cycles, and m is a whole number.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
76 words
A method for dynamic testing of logic circuits, comprising the steps of: supplying at least one digital signal having a bit pattern that occurs in cycles to a logic circuit; inserting dummy cycles into said bit pattern after at least two cycles of the bit pattern to provide a predetermined number of interconnected cycles of the dummy cycles; and evaluating outputs of the logic circuit only at the end of the interconnected cycles of dummy cycles.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
76 words
A method for dynamic testing of logic circuits, comprising the steps of: supplying at least one digital signal having a bit pattern that occurs in cycles to a logic circuit; inserting dummy cycles into said bit pattern after at least two cycles of the bit pattern to provide a predetermined number of interconnected cycles of the dummy cycles; and evaluating outputs of the logic circuit only at the end of the interconnected cycles of dummy cycles.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method according to claim 4, wherein a number z of the cycles of said bit pattern is determined according to; z=(n×m)+1, where n is the number of interconnected cycles, and m is a whole number.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method according to claim 4, wherein the number z is a prime number.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-08-27 | 2000-02-26 | 2000-08-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-08-27 | 2004-02-26 | 2004-08-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-08-27 | 2008-02-26 | 2008-08-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |