US5546329A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Evaluation and ranking of manufacturing line non-numeric information
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1995-06-01
•
Granted: 1996-08-13
•
Expires: 2015-06-01
Abstract
Abstract An apparatus and method for quantitatively ranking the performance of each attribute contributing to a manufacturing process. Various signals representing the measure (i.e., quality or yield) of a manufacturing run and representing the attributes that contributed to each manufacturing run are recorded. An iterative process is commenced whereby numeric weights are assigned to each attribute. In a first iterative step, the weight of each attribute is determined to be the weighted average of the measure of each manufacturing run to which that attribute contributed. In subsequent iteration steps, a refined weight for each attribute is determined by computing the ratio between the normalized measure and the product of all other weights associated with that manufacturing run. The iterations are continued until the weights determined for each attribute converge or become self consistent. In this manner, the performance of non-numeric or attribute parameters such as operators and tools can be measured and defined in terms of a numeric quantity.
Inventors
- 👤 Jerome M. Kurtzberg
- 👤 Menachem Levanoni
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 14:55
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/418; G05B19/41875; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/30; G05B2219/32; G05B2219/32187; Y; Y02; Y02P; Y02P90/00; Y02P90/02
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
157 words
A computer operated method for quantitatively determining the performance of a plurality of non-numeric attributes of a manufacturing line, comprising the steps of: (a) recording in a computer processor database a measure signal for each of a plurality of manufacturing runs on the manufacturing line, wherein each said measure signal comprises a data signal representing an output measure of the manufacturing line, and said data signals are obtained by operating the manufacturing line to produce a product; (b) recording in said computer processor database attribute ID signals associated with each of said plurality of manufacturing runs, wherein each of said attribute ID signals identifies a non-numeric attribute that contributed to the manufacturing run; (c) normalizing said recorded measure signal for each of said plurality of manufacturing runs; and (d) using a convergent iterative process to deconvolute said normalized recorded measure signals and said attribute ID signals to generate a quantitative numeric measure signal for the non-numeric attributes.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
157 words
A computer operated method for quantitatively determining the performance of a plurality of non-numeric attributes of a manufacturing line, comprising the steps of: (a) recording in a computer processor database a measure signal for each of a plurality of manufacturing runs on the manufacturing line, wherein each said measure signal comprises a data signal representing an output measure of the manufacturing line, and said data signals are obtained by operating the manufacturing line to produce a product; (b) recording in said computer processor database attribute ID signals associated with each of said plurality of manufacturing runs, wherein each of said attribute ID signals identifies a non-numeric attribute that contributed to the manufacturing run; (c) normalizing said recorded measure signal for each of said plurality of manufacturing runs; and (d) using a convergent iterative process to deconvolute said normalized recorded measure signals and said attribute ID signals to generate a quantitative numeric measure signal for the non-numeric attributes.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
97 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said step (d) further comprises the steps of: (i) selecting manufacturing runs to which a selected one of the plurality of non-numeric attributes contribute; (ii) ascribing said recorded measure signal for each selected run to said selected non-numeric attribute; (iii) determining a weighted average of all said ascribed measure signals to generate said quantitative numeric measure signal for said selected non-numeric attribute; and (iv) repeating said steps (i)-(iii) for each of the plurality of non-numeric attributes to generate said quantitative numeric measure signal for each of the plurality of non-numeric attributes.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
79 words
The method of claim 2, further comprising the steps of: (v) computing a refined quantitative numeric measure signal for a selected one of the plurality of non-numeric attributes as a ratio between said normalized measure signal and a product of said quantitative numeric measure signals of all other non-numeric attributes; and (vi) repeating said steps (i)-(iii) for each of the plurality of non-numeric attributes to generate said quantitative numeric measure signal for each of the plurality of non-numeric attributes.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 3, further comprising the step of repeating said steps (v)-(vi) until said refined quantitative numeric measure signals converge.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said step (c) comprises the steps of subtracting a value ε from said recorded measure signal and dividing this result by a maximum said recorded measure signal to normalize said recorded measure signal of each manufacturing run to value between ε and one.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of editing manufacturing runs containing anomalous data points.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: (e) adjusting the non-numeric attributes based on said quantitative numeric measure signal to optimize the manufacturing line, wherein production of said product is optimized as a result of said adjusting.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
148 words
A system for quantitatively determining the performance of a plurality of non-numeric attributes of a manufacturing line, comprising: (a) means for recording a measure signal for each of a plurality of manufacturing runs on the manufacturing line, wherein each said measure signal comprises a data signal indicating an output measure of the manufacturing line and said data signals are obtained by operating the manufacturing line to produce a product; (b) means for recording attribute ID signals associated with each of said plurality of manufacturing runs, wherein each of said attribute ID signals identifies a non-numeric attribute that contributed to the manufacturing run; (c) means for normalizing said recorded measure signal for each of said plurality of manufacturing runs; and (d) means for deconvoluting said normalized recorded measure signals and attribute ID signals using a convergent iterative process to generate a quantitative numeric measure signal for the non-numeric attributes.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
148 words
A system for quantitatively determining the performance of a plurality of non-numeric attributes of a manufacturing line, comprising: (a) means for recording a measure signal for each of a plurality of manufacturing runs on the manufacturing line, wherein each said measure signal comprises a data signal indicating an output measure of the manufacturing line and said data signals are obtained by operating the manufacturing line to produce a product; (b) means for recording attribute ID signals associated with each of said plurality of manufacturing runs, wherein each of said attribute ID signals identifies a non-numeric attribute that contributed to the manufacturing run; (c) means for normalizing said recorded measure signal for each of said plurality of manufacturing runs; and (d) means for deconvoluting said normalized recorded measure signals and attribute ID signals using a convergent iterative process to generate a quantitative numeric measure signal for the non-numeric attributes.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
72 words
The system of claim 8, wherein said means for deconvoluting comprises: (i) means for selecting manufacturing runs to which a selected one of the plurality of non-numeric attributes contributed; (ii) means for ascribing said recorded measure signal for each selected run to said selected non-numeric attribute; and (iii) means for determining a weighted average of all said ascribed measure signals to generate said quantitative numeric measure signal for said selected non-numeric attribute.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
53 words
The system of claim 9, wherein said means for deconvoluting further comprises means for computing a refined quantitative numeric measure signal for a selected one of the plurality of non-numeric attributes as a ratio between said normalized measure signal and a product of said quantitative numeric measure signals of all other non-numeric attributes.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of claim 8, wherein said means for normalizing comprises means for editing manufacturing runs containing anomalous data points.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4328556A
Cited
US4089056A
Cited
US4115848A
Cited
US4604718A
Cited
US4858154A
Cited
US4870590A
Cited
US5008842A
Cited
US5177688A
Cited
US5150288A
Cited
US5140537A
Cited
US5047947A
Cited
US5229948A
Cited
US5339257A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-08-13 | 2000-02-12 | 2000-08-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-08-13 | 2004-02-12 | 2004-08-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-08-13 | 2008-02-12 | 2008-08-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |