Patent US5541577A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5541577A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Electromagnetic asset protection system
Assignee: Consolidated Graphic Materials Inc
•
Filing: 1995-05-26
•
Granted: 1996-07-30
•
Expires: 2015-05-26
Abstract
Abstract The security of articles, and particularly articles in transit, is checked by detecting the status of a magnetic strip attached to the articles at a strategic location when the strip is subjected to an electromagnetic field which causes the strip to substantially saturate magnetically, the status of an improper strip, that is to say, a strip whose electromagnetic properties differ from those of a proper strip as a result of physical modification or disparity, being reflected in the nature of the electromagnetic field emanating therefrom, detection of the status of that field providing an indication of whether the strip is proper or not. The same principles can be applied to the coding of articles for validation of identity or authenticity.
Inventors
- 👤 Michael N. Cooper
- 👤 Erik Hoffer
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 09:18
CPC Classifications
G; G08; G08B; G08B13/00; G08B13/22; G08B13/24; G08B13/2402; G08B13/2405; G08B13/2408; G08B13/2428; G08B13/2437; G08B13/2445; G08B13/2465; G08B13/2468; G08B13/2471; G08B13/2474
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 30
Claim 1
Independent Claim
65 words
The method of checking the security of an openable object which comprises (a) placing on said object across the openable area thereof a magnetic strip, and (b) subjecting said strip to a field affecting its magnetic status, detecting the field emanating from said strip, and giving an indication in response to said detected field of the presence or absence of a strip in proper condition.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
65 words
The method of checking the security of an openable object which comprises (a) placing on said object across the openable area thereof a magnetic strip, and (b) subjecting said strip to a field affecting its magnetic status, detecting the field emanating from said strip, and giving an indication in response to said detected field of the presence or absence of a strip in proper condition.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
70 words
The method of claim 1, in which the presence or absence of a strip in proper condition is determined by comparing a signal dependent on the nature of the field actually emanating from said strip and a reference signal representing a field smaller than that which would emanate from such a proper strip and causing said indication if said signal representing said actual field is greater than said reference signal.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
47 words
The method of either of claims 1 or 2, in which the presence or absence of a strip in proper condition is detected on the basis of the characteristic of said strip that it loses a substantial portion of its magnetic field activity if it is cut.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 2, in which the condition of a strip is determined by the shape factor of said strip, which is different if said strip is cut or not.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 4, in which the presence or absence of a proper strip is determined by detecting the lower harmonics of the field emanating from said strip.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 5, in which said lower harmonics comprises harmonics 5-15.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1, in which the proper condition of a strip is determined by the shape factor of said strip which is different if said strip is cut or is not.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 7, in which the presence or absence of a proper strip is determined by detecting the lower harmonics of the field emanating from said strip.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 8, in which said lower harmonics comprises harmonics 5-15.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
40 words
In the method of any of claims 1, 2, 8 or 9, testing for the presence of undesirable conditions at the time of said strip field detection, and preventing said indication in the event that said undesirable conditions are detected.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
In the method of claim 10, preventing said indication by comparing the intensity of higher harmonics of said emanating field with a predetermined standard.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 11, in which said higher harmonics comprises harmonics 25-30.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
56 words
In the method of any of claims 1, 2, 8 or 9, comparing said actual field signal with a reference signal corresponding to that which would emanate from a proper strip of predetermined dimensions, and preventing said indication of a proper strip in the event that said reference signal is less than said actual field signal.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 13, in which said actual field signal is based upon lower harmonics of said signal comprising harmonics 5-15.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
79 words
A device for use with an openable object for detecting whether said object has been opened which comprises a body securable to said object so as to extend across the openable portion thereof, said body comprising a magnetic strip which spans said openable portion and which has a shape factor such that when subjected to an external field the field emanating therefrom will be significantly different if said strip has been cut than if it has not been cut.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
79 words
A device for use with an openable object for detecting whether said object has been opened which comprises a body securable to said object so as to extend across the openable portion thereof, said body comprising a magnetic strip which spans said openable portion and which has a shape factor such that when subjected to an external field the field emanating therefrom will be significantly different if said strip has been cut than if it has not been cut.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
21 words
The device of claim 15, in which said strip has a shape factor figure of merit of at least about 200.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
45 words
The device of claim 15 in which said body further comprises a strip secured to said object and of a type such as to leave visible evidence on the object if an attempt is made to wholly or partially remove said strip from said object.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
22 words
The device of claim 17, in which said latter strip when in place on said object hides said former strip from view.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
14 words
The device of claim 17, in which said body further comprises a tamper-evident strip.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
60 words
A device for use with an openable object for detecting whether said object has been opened which comprises a body securable to said object so as to extend across the openable portion thereof, said body comprising a magnetic strip which spans said openable portion and which has the characteristic that when it is cut its magnetic properties are substantially altered.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
60 words
A device for use with an openable object for detecting whether said object has been opened which comprises a body securable to said object so as to extend across the openable portion thereof, said body comprising a magnetic strip which spans said openable portion and which has the characteristic that when it is cut its magnetic properties are substantially altered.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
45 words
The device of claim 20, in which said body further comprises a strip secured to said object and of a type such as to leave visible evidence on the object if an attempt is made to wholly or partially remove said strip from said object.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
22 words
The device of claim 21, in which said latter strip when in place on said object hides said former strip from view.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
14 words
The device of claim 21, in which said body further comprises a tamper-evident strip.
Claim 27
Independent Claim
74 words
The method of identifying a package which comprises (a) placing on said package a magnetic strip which when exposed to a given external field produces an electromagnetic field of predetermined nature, and (b) subjecting said strip on said package to said given external field, detecting said field produced by said strip, and giving an indication in accordance with said detected field as to whether said detected field is of said predetermined nature or not.
Claim 28
Independent Claim
74 words
The method of identifying a package which comprises (a) placing on said package a magnetic strip which when exposed to a given external field produces an electromagnetic field of predetermined nature, and (b) subjecting said strip on said package to said given external field, detecting said field produced by said strip, and giving an indication in accordance with said detected field as to whether said detected field is of said predetermined nature or not.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method of claim 24, in which the presence of absence of a strip identifying said object is determined by comparing a signal dependent on the nature of said detected field and a reference signal representing said field of predetermined nature and causing said indication on the basis of a comparison between said signals.
Claim 30
Independent Claim
40 words
The method of either of claims 24 or 25, in which said predetermined nature of said produced field is determined by a combination of the magnetic and mechanical characteristics of said strip and the nature of said given external field.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4063229A
Cited
US3665449A
Cited
GB1330481A
Cited
US3983552A
Cited
US4063230A
Cited
US4435699A
Cited
US4075618A
Cited
US4262284A
Cited
US4334214A
Cited
US4309697A
Cited
US4605922A
Cited
US4660025A
Cited
US4639902A
Cited
US4660024A
Cited
US4980670A
Cited
US5029291A
Cited
US5189396A
Cited
US5111184A
Cited
US5169188A
Cited
US5353010A
Cited
US5406263A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-07-30 | 2000-01-29 | 2000-07-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-07-30 | 2004-01-29 | 2004-07-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-07-30 | 2008-01-29 | 2008-07-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |