US5535286A — Error detection in seismic data

Claim 1

Independent Claim 178 words

Apparatus for detecting errors in frames of seismic data capable of being presented as images, such images being expected to exhibit an inherent symmetry about an axis, the apparatus comprising: a storage device for storing a frame of seismic data capable of being presented as an image; a selection device for selecting an axis within the image as the axis of symmetry; a divider for dividing the data about the axis of symmetry to create first and second sets of data, wherein the divider includes a mirroring means for re-ordering the data in the first set of data so that it can be presented by an image which would be the mirror image of the image previously representing the set; and a comparison means for comparing the re-ordered first set of data and second set of data according to preselected matching criteria to determine, based on the degree of matching, whether the extent of mismatch in the frame of data is within a predetermined tolerance and, if it is, to indicate the frame of seismic data is valid.

Claim 2

Dependent Claim 178 words

Apparatus for detecting errors in frames of seismic data capable of being presented as images, such images being expected to exhibit an inherent symmetry about an axis, the apparatus comprising: a storage device for storing a frame of seismic data capable of being presented as an image; a selection device for selecting an axis within the image as the axis of symmetry; a divider for dividing the data about the axis of symmetry to create first and second sets of data, wherein the divider includes a mirroring means for re-ordering the data in the first set of data so that it can be presented by an image which would be the mirror image of the image previously representing the set; and a comparison means for comparing the re-ordered first set of data and second set of data according to preselected matching criteria to determine, based on the degree of matching, whether the extent of mismatch in the frame of data is within a predetermined tolerance and, if it is, to indicate the frame of seismic data is valid.

Claim 3

Dependent Claim 54 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the comparison means comprises: a matching device for comparing the first and second sets of data to determine the degree of matching between such sets; and decision logic, responsive to output from the matching device, to determine whether the extent of mismatch is within the predetermined tolerance.

Claim 4

Dependent Claim 49 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein the comparison means further comprises: an edge detector for determining the data points representing discontinuities in the image, and to create an edge list of such data points, such edge lists being used as the basis of comparison by the matching device.

Claim 5

Dependent Claim 48 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the divider operates on the whole frame of seismic data prior to passing the first and second sets of data separately through the edge detector, the edge lists created by the edge detector being received by the matching device for comparison.

Claim 6

Dependent Claim 50 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the edge detector operates on the whole frame of seismic data and then the edge list is operated on by the divider so as to create two edge lists as the first and second sets of data for comparison by the matching device.

Claim 7

Dependent Claim 25 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the edge detector employs a canny edge detection algorithm in order to identify the data points representing edges.

Claim 8

Dependent Claim 61 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the mirroring means re-orders the first set of data created by the divider by employing a buffer in which to store data from that set of data constituting a row of an image, the contents in the buffer then being read out in reverse order and stored as the re-ordered first set of data.

Claim 9

Dependent Claim 15 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein the matching device uses a stereo matching algorithm.

Claim 10

Dependent Claim 15 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 8, wherein the stereo matching algorithm is the PMF algorithm.

Claim 11

Dependent Claim 32 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the selection device is an amplitude peak detector which selects the axis of symmetry as the position in the data having the highest detected intensity.

Claim 12

Dependent Claim 37 words

Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the selection device uses information contained in the seismic data, giving the positioning of the shot for that frame of data, to select an axis as the axis of symmetry.

Claim 13

Independent Claim 191 words

A method of detecting errors in frames of seismic data capable of being presented as images, such images being expected to exhibit an inherent symmetry about an axis, the method comprising the steps of: (a) storing a frame of seismic data capable of being presented as an image in a storage device; (b) selecting an axis within the image as the axis of symmetry; (c) employing a divider to divide the image about the axis of symmetry to create first and second sets of data, wherein the dividing step includes a mirroring step which re-orders the data in the first set of data so that it can be represented by an image which would be the mirror image of the image previously representing that set; (d) comparing, in a comparing means, the re-ordered first set of data and second set of data according to preselected matching criteria to determine, based on the degree of matching, whether the extent of mismatch in the frame of data is within a predetermined tolerance; and (e) indicating, if extent of the mismatch is within the predetermined tolerance, that the frame of seismic data is valid.

Claim 14

Independent Claim 191 words

A method of detecting errors in frames of seismic data capable of being presented as images, such images being expected to exhibit an inherent symmetry about an axis, the method comprising the steps of: (a) storing a frame of seismic data capable of being presented as an image in a storage device; (b) selecting an axis within the image as the axis of symmetry; (c) employing a divider to divide the image about the axis of symmetry to create first and second sets of data, wherein the dividing step includes a mirroring step which re-orders the data in the first set of data so that it can be represented by an image which would be the mirror image of the image previously representing that set; (d) comparing, in a comparing means, the re-ordered first set of data and second set of data according to preselected matching criteria to determine, based on the degree of matching, whether the extent of mismatch in the frame of data is within a predetermined tolerance; and (e) indicating, if extent of the mismatch is within the predetermined tolerance, that the frame of seismic data is valid.

Claim 15

Dependent Claim 72 words

A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the comparison step comprises the steps of: (i) forming an edge list for each of the first and second sets of data; (ii) comparing, in a matching device, edge lists to determine the degree of matching between the edges represented by such lists; and (iii) determining, in response to output from the matching device, whether the extent of mismatch is within the predetermined tolerance.

Claim 16

Dependent Claim 58 words

A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the comparison step further comprises, prior to the comparing step, the step of: (iii) determining, in an edge detector, the data points representing discontinuities in the image, and creating an edge list of such data points, such edge lists being used as the basis of comparison by the matching device.

Claim 17

Dependent Claim 54 words

A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the edge detection step is performed on the whole frame of data and then the edge list is used as the input for the step of dividing the image so as to create two edge lists as the first and second sets of data for comparison.

Claim 18

Dependent Claim 19 words

A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the dividing step is performed prior to the step of comparing.

Annuity Stage	Window Opens	Payment Deadline	Surcharge Period Until	Estimated Fee	Status
3.5 Years (Year 4)	1999-07-09	2000-01-08	2000-07-09	$2000.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8)	2003-07-09	2004-01-08	2004-07-09	$3760.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12)	2007-07-09	2008-01-08	2008-07-09	$7700.00	Window Closed / Lapsed

Error detection in seismic data

Abstract

Inventors

Bibliographic Details

Claims Analysis

References Cited (Backward Citations)

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Assigned Categories & Tags

Assign Category Tag