Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 32
Claim 1
Independent Claim
131 words
A non-destructive fuse circuit capable of simulating blowing a fuse, comprising: the fuse; a control logic means connected to the fuse, wherein an output signal of the control logic means is connected to a first terminal of the fuse, a second terminal of the fuse is connected to a first terminal of a transistor, a second terminal of the transistor is connected to a voltage supply, and an input of a first inverter is connected to the second terminal of the fuse, and an output of the first inverter is connected to a third terminal of the transistor; and a signal coupled to the control logic means which controls the control logic means such that when the signal is brought to a first logic level, blowing of the fuse is simulated.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
131 words
A non-destructive fuse circuit capable of simulating blowing a fuse, comprising: the fuse; a control logic means connected to the fuse, wherein an output signal of the control logic means is connected to a first terminal of the fuse, a second terminal of the fuse is connected to a first terminal of a transistor, a second terminal of the transistor is connected to a voltage supply, and an input of a first inverter is connected to the second terminal of the fuse, and an output of the first inverter is connected to a third terminal of the transistor; and a signal coupled to the control logic means which controls the control logic means such that when the signal is brought to a first logic level, blowing of the fuse is simulated.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
The circuit of claim 1, wherein when the signal is the first logic level, the output of the first inverter is the first logic level, and the non-destructive fuse circuit simulates blowing the fuse.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
17 words
The circuit of claim 1, wherein the signal is a derivative signal of a test mode operation.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
14 words
The circuit of claim 1, wherein the control logic means is a second inverter.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
44 words
The circuit of claim 4, wherein the second inverter is sized so that when the signal is a second logic level, the fuse and the second inverter can overcome the transistor if there is any contention between the fuse, the second inverter, and transistor.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
20 words
The circuit of claim 1, wherein the non-destructive fuse circuit is suitable for use in an integrated circuit memory device.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
17 words
The circuit of claim 1, wherein the non-destructive fuse circuit is suitable for use in a microprocessor.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
49 words
The circuit of claim 1, wherein the transistor is a MOS transistor having a gate, a source, and a drain, and the first terminal of the transistor is the drain, the second terminal of the transistor is the source, and the third terminal of the transistor is the gate.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
18 words
The circuit of claim 8, wherein the transistor is a NMOS transistor and the voltage supply is Vss.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
18 words
The circuit of claim 8, wherein the transistor is a PMOS transistor and the voltage supply is Vcc.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
70 words
The circuit of claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of addressable elements; a plurality of redundant elements; and a plurality of non-destructive fuse circuits, wherein each non-destructive fuse circuit is connected to a redundant element such that when the non-destructive fuse circuit simulates blowing the fuse, the redundant element may be enabled and may be tested to determine whether the redundant element is suitable for replacing a defective addressable element.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
40 words
The circuit of claim 11, wherein the non-destructive fuse circuit comprises the signal, and when the signal is brought to the first logic level, the non-destructive fuse circuit simulates blowing the fuse so that the redundant element may be enabled.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
40 words
The circuit of claim 12, wherein when the signal is the first logic level, the output of the first inverter is the first logic level, the non-destructive fuse circuit simulates blowing the fuse, and the redundant element may be enabled.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
19 words
The circuit of claim 11, wherein the redundant element is enabled and tested prior to a laser repair step.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
20 words
The circuit of claim 11, wherein the non-destructive fuse circuit is suitable for use in an integrated circuit memory device.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
117 words
A method of simulating blowing a fuse, comprising the steps of: applying a signal to a control logic means which is connected to the fuse, wherein an output signal of the controls logic means is connected to a first terminal of the fuse, a second terminal of the fuse is connected to a first terminal of a transistor, a second terminal of the transistor is connected to a voltage supply, an input of a first inverter is connected to the second terminal of the fuse, and an output of the first inverter is connected to a third terminal of the transistor; and bringing the signal to a first logic level so that blowing the fuse is simulated.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
117 words
A method of simulating blowing a fuse, comprising the steps of: applying a signal to a control logic means which is connected to the fuse, wherein an output signal of the controls logic means is connected to a first terminal of the fuse, a second terminal of the fuse is connected to a first terminal of a transistor, a second terminal of the transistor is connected to a voltage supply, an input of a first inverter is connected to the second terminal of the fuse, and an output of the first inverter is connected to a third terminal of the transistor; and bringing the signal to a first logic level so that blowing the fuse is simulated.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 16, wherein when the signal is the first logic level, the output of the first inverter is the first logic level, and blowing the fuse is simulated.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 16, wherein the signal is a derivative signal of a test mode operation.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 16, wherein the control logic means is a second inverter.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 19, wherein the second inverter is sized so that when the signal is a second logic level, the fuse and the second inverter can overcome the transistor if there is any contention between the fuse, the second inverter, and transistor.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 16, wherein the method is suitable for use in an integrated circuit memory device.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 16, wherein the method is suitable for use in a microprocessor.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 16, wherein the transistor is a MOS transistor having a gate, a source, and a drain, and the first terminal of the transistor is the drain, the second terminal of the transistor is the source, and the third terminal of the transistor is the gate.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 23, wherein the transistor is a NMOS transistor and the voltage supply is Vss.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 23, wherein the transistor is a PMOS transistor and the voltage supply is Vcc.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 16, wherein the output of the first inverter controls a redundant element, and bringing the signal to the first logic level allows the redundant element to be enabled.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 26, wherein when the signal is the first logic level, the output of the first inverter is the first logic level, the control logic means simulates blowing the fuse, and the redundant element may be enabled.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 27, wherein after the redundant element is enabled, comprising the further step of: testing the redundant element, prior to a laser repair step, to determine whether the redundant element is suitable for replacing a defective addressable element.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 28, wherein the redundant element is enabled and tested prior to the laser repair step.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 26, wherein the method of simulating blowing the fuse is suitable for use in an integrated circuit memory device.