Connectionist architecture for weapons assignment

Claim 3

The system recited in claim 1 further comprising means for adjusting the strength of all interconnections to the particular second processing element representing the particular fire unit to zero when all the weapons associated with said particular fire unit are used.

Claim 4

A computer implemented method for assigning a plurality of fire units to defend a plurality of assets from a plurality of threats to said assets, each of said assets having a relative value and being located in a defined geographic area, each of said fire units having an initial number of weapons and each fire unit having a coverage area wherein said weapons are effective in protecting said assets, said method comprising: representing said plurality of assets by a plurality of first processing elements; representing said plurality of fire units by a plurality of second processing elements; connecting each of said plurality of first processing elements with each of said plurality of second processing elements by interconnections, said interconnections having a strength that is a function of a random noise factor, the number of weapons in a particular fire unit represented by a particular second processing element, a Boolean 1 or 0 depending on whether a particular asset is inside or outside of a coverage area for the particular fire unit, respectively, represented by a particular first processing element; adjusting the strength of said interconnections as a function of the relative value of the particular asset represented by the particular first processing element to which said interconnection is made; determining a particular interconnection having a greatest strength; assigning a weapon from said particular fire unit represented by said particular second processing element connected by said particular interconnection having the greatest strength to defend said particular asset connected by said particular interconnection having the greatest strength; and determining if the greatest strength of the particular interconnection is less than a predetermined threshold after a weapon from said particular fire unit is assigned to defend said particular asset; and resetting the interconnection strength of each interconnection when the greatest strength of the particular interconnection is less than the predetermined threshold, wherein the resetting due to the random noise factor allows other fire units a chance to participate prior to assigning all the weapons from said particular fire unit.

Claim 5

A computer implemented method for assigning a plurality of fire units to defend a plurality of assets from a plurality of threats to said assets, each of said assets having a relative value and being located in a defined geographic area, each of said fire units having an initial number of weapons and each fire unit having a coverage area wherein said weapons are effective in protecting said assets, said method comprising: representing said plurality of assets by a plurality of first processing elements; representing said plurality of fire units by a plurality of second processing elements; connecting each of said plurality of first processing elements with each of said plurality of second processing elements by interconnections, said interconnections having a strength that is a function of a random noise factor, the number of weapons in a particular fire unit represented by a particular second processing element, a Boolean 1 or 0 depending on whether a particular asset is inside or outside of a coverage area for the particular fire unit, respectively, represented by a particular first processing element; adjusting the strength of said interconnections as a function of the relative value of the particular asset represented by the particular first processing element to which said interconnection is made; determining a particular interconnection having a greatest strength; assigning a weapon from said particular fire unit represented by said particular second processing element connected by said particular interconnection having the greatest strength to defend said particular asset connected by said particular interconnection having the greatest strength; and determining if the greatest strength of the particular interconnection is less than a predetermined threshold after a weapon from said particular fire unit is assigned to defend said particular asset; and resetting the interconnection strength of each interconnection when the greatest strength of the particular interconnection is less than the predetermined threshold, wherein the resetting due to the random noise factor allows other fire units a chance to participate prior to assigning all the weapons from said particular fire unit.

Claim 6

The method recited in claim 3 further comprising adjusting the strength of all interconnections to the particular second processing element representing the particular fire unit to zero when all the weapons associated with said particular fire unit are used.

Claim 7

The method recited in claim 4 further comprising the steps of: determining an interconnection having a next greatest strength; and assigning a weapon from said particular fire unit represented by said particular second processing element connected by said particular interconnection having the next greatest strength to defend said particular asset connected by said particular interconnection having the next greatest strength; and repeating said steps of determining the next greatest strength and assigning a weapon.

Claim 8

A weapons system for defending a plurality of assets from a plurality of threats, said weapons system comprising: a plurality of first processing elements representing the plurality of assets, each of said assets having a relative value and located in a defined geographic area; a plurality of second processing elements representing a plurality of fire units, each of said fire units having an initial number of weapons and a coverage area where said weapons are effective in protecting said assets from the plurality of threats; a plurality of interconnections connecting each of said plurality of first processing elements with each of said plurality of second processing elements, each of said interconnections having a strength that is a function of a random noise factor, the number of weapons in a fire unit, and a Boolean 1 or 0 depending on whether an asset is inside or outside of a coverage area; scaling means for adjusting the strength of each interconnection based on the relative values of the assets; selection means for determining a first maximum interconnection having a greatest strength; assignment means for assigning a weapon from the fire unit connected by the first maximum interconnection to defend the asset connected by the first maximum interconnection; and threshold means for determining if the strength of the first maximum interconnection is less than a predetermined threshold after a weapon from the fire unit connected by the first maximum interconnection is assigned to defend the asset connected by the first maximum interconnection; and resetting means for resetting the interconnection strength of each interconnection when the strength of the first maximum interconnection is less than the predetermined threshold.

Claim 9

A weapons system for defending a plurality of assets from a plurality of threats, said weapons system comprising: a plurality of first processing elements representing the plurality of assets, each of said assets having a relative value and located in a defined geographic area; a plurality of second processing elements representing a plurality of fire units, each of said fire units having an initial number of weapons and a coverage area where said weapons are effective in protecting said assets from the plurality of threats; a plurality of interconnections connecting each of said plurality of first processing elements with each of said plurality of second processing elements, each of said interconnections having a strength that is a function of a random noise factor, the number of weapons in a fire unit, and a Boolean 1 or 0 depending on whether an asset is inside or outside of a coverage area; scaling means for adjusting the strength of each interconnection based on the relative values of the assets; selection means for determining a first maximum interconnection having a greatest strength; assignment means for assigning a weapon from the fire unit connected by the first maximum interconnection to defend the asset connected by the first maximum interconnection; and threshold means for determining if the strength of the first maximum interconnection is less than a predetermined threshold after a weapon from the fire unit connected by the first maximum interconnection is assigned to defend the asset connected by the first maximum interconnection; and resetting means for resetting the interconnection strength of each interconnection when the strength of the first maximum interconnection is less than the predetermined threshold.

Claim 10

The weapons system recited in claim 6 wherein the coverage areas of the fire units overlap to protect the assets.

Claim 11

The weapons system recited in claim 6 further comprising probability means for determining a probability that a weapon from a fire unit will defeat the threat to an asset.

Claim 12

The weapons system recited in claim 6 further comprising adjustment means for adjusting the strength of all interconnections connected to a fire unit to zero when all the initial number of weapons associated with the fire unit are used and for adjusting the strength of all interconnections to an asset to zero when all threats associated with the asset are defeated.

Claim 13

The weapons system recited in claim 6 wherein the selection means further determines a second maximum interconnection having a next greatest strength.

Claim 14

The weapons system recited in claim 10 wherein the assignment means assigns a weapon from the fire unit connected by the second maximum interconnection to defend the asset connected by the second maximum interconnection.

Claim 15

The weapons system recited in claim 6 wherein the relative value of each asset is determined from an economic value of each asset.

Claim 16

The weapons system recited in claim 6 wherein the random noise factor is a uniform pseudo-random number which is a continuously variable value between 0 and 1.

Claim 17

The weapons system recited in claim 6 wherein said predetermined threshold is equal to the number of fire units times the number of assets.

Claim 18

The weapons system recited in claim 6 wherein said resetting means due to the random noise factor allows other fire units to participate prior to assigning all the weapons from the fire unit connected by the first maximum interconnection.