← Back to Patent Explorer
US5153366A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for allocating and assigning defensive weapons against attacking weapons

Assignee: Raytheon Co
•
Filing: 1990-05-22
•
Granted: 1992-10-06
•
Expires: 2010-05-22
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The present method includes estimating for each kth one of K attack weapons a target threat value, P k , and for each available counter-weapons a counter-threat value, P k , against each kth attack weapon. Prospective counter-weapon allocations are tabulated. Each ith allocation has N i counter-weapons and for each a reduced target threat value: ##EQU1## is computed, x ki being equal to the integer number of counter-weapons in the ith allocation assigned to a kth one of the attack weapons, assuming one type of counter-weapons. The set of x ki 's that causes E Ri to be a minimum is the optimum counter-weapon assignment for the ith allocation. One of the prospective allocations is selected for a first "shoot-look" cycle in which the N i counter-weapons are assigned according to the optimum x ki 's. The procedure may be repeated for subsequent "shoot-look" cycles. If there aare more than one type of counter-weapons, E Ri is obtained by the equation: ##EQU2## wherein x lki is the integer number of the counter-weapons of the lth type assigned to the kth attack weapon and L is the total number of different counter-weapon types. The set of x lki 's causing E Ri to be a minimum is the optimum counter-weapon assignment for the allocation.

Inventors

  • 👤 Thomas W. Lucas

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-28 16:30
CPC Classifications
F; F41; F41G; F41G7/00; F41G7/007; F41G9/00; G; G06; G06Q; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/04; G06Q10/06

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim 225 words
A method for allocating and assigning, in response to an enemy attack on a target by a plurality, K, of attack weapons, counter-weapons from a plurality, M, of available counter-weapons for defense of said target, the method comprising the steps of: a) estimating for each kth one of the K attack weapons a target threat value, P k , relative to the target, wherein k=1, 2, . . . ,K; b) estimating for each one of the M counter-weapons a counter-threat value relative to each kth one of the K attack weapons; c) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values with the estimated target threat values according to a pre-established relationship, for each ith one of a series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N i , of counter-weapons, an associated optimum assignment of the N i counter-weapons against the K attack weapons that is selected to cause an associated composite reduced target threat value, E Ri , of the attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value; d) selecting from the series of prospective counter-weapon allocations a particular ith one of the counter-weapons allocations to be used against the K attack weapons; and e) assigning the N i counter-weapons of the particular selected allocation against the K attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapons assignment associated with the selected allocation.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 225 words
A method for allocating and assigning, in response to an enemy attack on a target by a plurality, K, of attack weapons, counter-weapons from a plurality, M, of available counter-weapons for defense of said target, the method comprising the steps of: a) estimating for each kth one of the K attack weapons a target threat value, P k , relative to the target, wherein k=1, 2, . . . ,K; b) estimating for each one of the M counter-weapons a counter-threat value relative to each kth one of the K attack weapons; c) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values with the estimated target threat values according to a pre-established relationship, for each ith one of a series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N i , of counter-weapons, an associated optimum assignment of the N i counter-weapons against the K attack weapons that is selected to cause an associated composite reduced target threat value, E Ri , of the attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value; d) selecting from the series of prospective counter-weapon allocations a particular ith one of the counter-weapons allocations to be used against the K attack weapons; and e) assigning the N i counter-weapons of the particular selected allocation against the K attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapons assignment associated with the selected allocation.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 79 words
The weapons allocation and assignment method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the number, M, of available counter-weapons is greater than the number, K, of attack weapons and including the step of defining an ith prospective allocation of counter-weapons for which the number, N i , of counter-weapons allocated is equal to the number, K, of attack weapons as a default allocation and including the step of selecting the default allocation and using the optimum weapons assignment associated therewith.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 214 words
The weapons allocation and assignment method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the number of counter-weapons, N i , in the particular selected counter-weapon allocation is less than the number M of available counter-weapons, and including the further steps of: a) determining, after firing of the counter-weapons assigned in accordance with the selected allocation, which ones of the K attack weapons have survived the N i allocated counter-weapons; b) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values of the remaining available counter-weapons with the estimated target threat values of the surviving attack weapons in said predetermined manner, for each jth one of a new series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N j , of the remaining counter-weapons, an associated optimum assignment of the N j counter-weapons against the surviving attack weapons that is selected to cause an associated, composite reduced target threat value, E Rj , of the surviving attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value; c) selecting from the new series of prospective counter-weapon allocations, a particular jth one of the counter-weapons allocations for use against the remaining attack weapons; and d) assigning the N j counter-weapons of the particular selected allocation against the surviving attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapons assignment associated with the selected allocation.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 85 words
The weapons allocation and assignment method as claimed in claim 3 including the steps of: a) estimating for at least some of the surviving attack weapons updated target threat values relative to the target; b) estimating for at least some of the remaining counter-weapons updated counter-threat values relative to each one of the surviving attack weapons; and c) using the updated target threat values and the updated counter-threat values for determining the new optimum counter-weapon assignments associated with the new series of prospective counter-weapon allocations.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 91 words
The weapons allocation and assignment method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of determining the optimum weapons assignments for the series of prospective counter-weapons allocations includes computing the corresponding minimum composite reduced threat values, E Ri , according to the equation: ##EQU12## wherein E Ri is the composite reduced threat value associated with the ith one of the prospective N i counter-weapons allocations and wherein x ki is equal to the integer number of counter-weapons in the ith allocation assigned to the kth one of the K attack weapons.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 59 words
The weapons allocation and assignment method as claimed in claim 5, including the step of selecting the x k 's for each ith one of the prospective counter-weapons allocations that causes the associated composite reduced target threat value, E i , to be a minimum for the number, N i , of counter-weapons allocated in the ith prospective allocation.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 318 words
A method for allocating and assigning, in response to an enemy attack on a target by a plurality, K, of attack weapons, counter-weapons from a plurality, M, of counter weapons for defense of said target, the method comprising the steps of: a) estimating for each kth one of the K attack weapons a target threat value, P k , relative to the target, wherein k=1, 2, . . . ,K; b) estimating for each one of the M counter-weapons a counter-threat value, P k , relative to each kth one of the K attack weapons, wherein k=1,2, . . . ,K; c) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values, P k , with the estimated target threat values, P k , according to a preestablished P k , P k relationship, for each ith one of a series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N i , of counter-weapons, a corresponding optimum assignment of the N i counter-weapons against the K attack weapons that causes an associated composite reduced target threat value, E Ri , of the attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value, the composite reduced target threat value being determined according to the expression: ##EQU13## wherein x ki is equal to the integer number of the N i counter-weapons in the ith counter-weapons allocation that is assigned to the kth one of the K attack weapons, the x ki 's being selected so as to cause the corresponding E Ri to have a minimum value for the number, N i , of counter-weapons allocated in the ith prospective allocation; d) selecting from the series of prospective allocations of counter-weapons an ith one of the allocations for use against the K attack weapons; and e) assigning the N i counter-weapons of the selected ith allocation against the K attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapon assignment associated with the selected counter-weapons allocation.
Claim 9
Independent Claim 318 words
A method for allocating and assigning, in response to an enemy attack on a target by a plurality, K, of attack weapons, counter-weapons from a plurality, M, of counter weapons for defense of said target, the method comprising the steps of: a) estimating for each kth one of the K attack weapons a target threat value, P k , relative to the target, wherein k=1, 2, . . . ,K; b) estimating for each one of the M counter-weapons a counter-threat value, P k , relative to each kth one of the K attack weapons, wherein k=1,2, . . . ,K; c) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values, P k , with the estimated target threat values, P k , according to a preestablished P k , P k relationship, for each ith one of a series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N i , of counter-weapons, a corresponding optimum assignment of the N i counter-weapons against the K attack weapons that causes an associated composite reduced target threat value, E Ri , of the attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value, the composite reduced target threat value being determined according to the expression: ##EQU13## wherein x ki is equal to the integer number of the N i counter-weapons in the ith counter-weapons allocation that is assigned to the kth one of the K attack weapons, the x ki 's being selected so as to cause the corresponding E Ri to have a minimum value for the number, N i , of counter-weapons allocated in the ith prospective allocation; d) selecting from the series of prospective allocations of counter-weapons an ith one of the allocations for use against the K attack weapons; and e) assigning the N i counter-weapons of the selected ith allocation against the K attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapon assignment associated with the selected counter-weapons allocation.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 263 words
The weapons allocation and assignment method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the number of counter-weapons, N i , in the particular selected counter-weapon allocation is less than the number M of available counter-weapons, and including the further steps of: a) determining, after firing, the kill effectiveness of the N i allocated counter-weapons against the K attack weapons so as to thereby establish the surviving attack weapons; b) estimating for at least some of the surviving attack weapons updated target threat values relative to the target; c) estimating for at least some of the remaining available counter-weapons updated counter-threat values relative to each one of the surviving attack weapons; d) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values of the remaining counter-weapons with the estimated target threat values of the surviving attack weapons in said predetermined manner and using the updated target threat values and the updated counter-threat values, for each jth one of a new series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N j , of the remaining counter-weapons, an associated optimum assignment of the N j counter-weapons against the surviving attack weapons that causes an associated composite reduced target threat value, E Rj , of the surviving attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value; e) selecting from the new series of prospective counter-weapon allocations, a particular jth one of the counter-weapons allocations for use against the surviving attack weapons; and f) assigning the N j counter-weapons of the particular selected allocation against the surviving attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapons assignment associated with the selected allocation.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 371 words
A method for allocating and assigning, in response to an enemy attack on a target by a plurality, K, of attack weapons, counter-weapons from a plurality, M, of counter weapons, including first and second types of counter-weapons, for defense of said target, the method comprising the steps of: a) estimating for each kth one of the K attack weapons a target threat value, P k , relative to the target, wherein k=1, 2, . . . ,K; b) estimating for each one of the first type of counter-weapons a counter-threat value, P 1k , relative to each kth one of the K attack weapons, wherein k=1,2, . . . ,K; c) estimating for each one of the second type of counter-weapons a counter-threat value, P 2k , relative to each kth one of the K attack weapons, wherein k=1,2, . . . ,K; d) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values, P 1k and P 2k , with the estimated target threat values, P k , according to a preestablished relationship, for each ith one of a series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N i , of counter-weapons, an associated optimum assignment of the N i counter-weapons against the K attack weapons that causes an associated composite reduced target threat value, E Ri , of the attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value, the composite reduced target threat value being determined according to the expression: ##EQU14## wherein L is equal to 2 for two types of counter-weapons and wherein x 1ki is equal to the integer number of counter-weapons of the lth type that is assigned to the kth one of the K attack weapons for the ith prospective counter-weapon allocation, the x 1ki 's being selected so as to cause the corresponding E Ri to have a minimum value for the number, N i , of counter-weapons allocated in the ith prospective allocation; e) selecting from the series of prospective allocations of counter-weapons an ith one of the allocations for use against the K attack weapons; and f) assigning the N i counter-weapons of the selected allocation against the K attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapon assignment associated with the selected counter-weapons allocation.
Claim 12
Independent Claim 371 words
A method for allocating and assigning, in response to an enemy attack on a target by a plurality, K, of attack weapons, counter-weapons from a plurality, M, of counter weapons, including first and second types of counter-weapons, for defense of said target, the method comprising the steps of: a) estimating for each kth one of the K attack weapons a target threat value, P k , relative to the target, wherein k=1, 2, . . . ,K; b) estimating for each one of the first type of counter-weapons a counter-threat value, P 1k , relative to each kth one of the K attack weapons, wherein k=1,2, . . . ,K; c) estimating for each one of the second type of counter-weapons a counter-threat value, P 2k , relative to each kth one of the K attack weapons, wherein k=1,2, . . . ,K; d) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values, P 1k and P 2k , with the estimated target threat values, P k , according to a preestablished relationship, for each ith one of a series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N i , of counter-weapons, an associated optimum assignment of the N i counter-weapons against the K attack weapons that causes an associated composite reduced target threat value, E Ri , of the attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value, the composite reduced target threat value being determined according to the expression: ##EQU14## wherein L is equal to 2 for two types of counter-weapons and wherein x 1ki is equal to the integer number of counter-weapons of the lth type that is assigned to the kth one of the K attack weapons for the ith prospective counter-weapon allocation, the x 1ki 's being selected so as to cause the corresponding E Ri to have a minimum value for the number, N i , of counter-weapons allocated in the ith prospective allocation; e) selecting from the series of prospective allocations of counter-weapons an ith one of the allocations for use against the K attack weapons; and f) assigning the N i counter-weapons of the selected allocation against the K attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapon assignment associated with the selected counter-weapons allocation.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 263 words
The weapons allocation and assignment method as claimed in claim 9 wherein the number of counter-weapons, N i , in the particular selected counter-weapon allocation is less than the number M of available counter-weapons, and including the further steps of: a) determining, after firing, the kill effectiveness of the N i allocated counter-weapons against the K attack weapons so as to thereby establish the surviving attack weapons; b) estimating for at least some of the surviving attack weapons updated target threat values relative to the target; c) estimating for at least some of the remaining available counter-weapons updated counter-threat values relative to each one of the surviving attack weapons; d) determining, based upon combining the estimated counter-threat values of the remaining counter-weapons with the estimated target threat values of the surviving attack weapons in said predetermined manner and using the updated target threat values and the updated counter-threat values, for each jth one of a new series of prospective allocations of different numbers, N j , of the remaining counter-weapons, an associated optimum assignment of the N j counter-weapons against the surviving attack weapons that causes an associated composite reduced target threat value, E Rj , of the surviving attack weapons against the target to have a minimum value; e) selecting from the new series of prospective counter-weapon allocations, a particular jth one of the counter-weapons allocations for use against the surviving attack weapons; and f) assigning the N j counter-weapons of the particular selected allocation against the surviving attack weapons in accordance with the optimum weapons assignment associated with the selected allocation.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4267562A Cited
US4848208A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1995-10-06 1996-04-06 1996-10-06 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1999-10-06 2000-04-06 2000-10-06 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2003-10-06 2004-04-06 2004-10-06 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag