Patent US5511162A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5511162A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Automatic LSI testing apparatus using expert system

Assignee: NEC Corp
•
Filing: 1993-06-24
•
Granted: 1996-04-23
•
Expires: 2013-06-24
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An automatic testing apparatus includes an expert rule which is derived from expert knowledge and defines a tree of successively traceable nodes interconnected by decision branches which lead to a plurality of fault modes. Each of the nodes defines a particular test pattern and a corresponding expected value. One of the nodes is specified and a test pattern defined by the specified node is applied to an LSI chip under test and a result signal is derived therefrom. This result signal is compared with the expected value defined by the specified node to produce a comparison result. The tree of the expert rule is traced from the specified node to a subsequent node according to the comparison result and the subsequent node is specified instead of the previously specified node. The process is repeated as the tree is traced from one node to another until one of the fault modes is reached to identify a chip failure.

Inventors

  • 👤 Hiroyuki Hamada
  • 👤 Tohru Tsujide
  • 👤 Masaaki Sugimoto

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 14:00
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/22; G06F11/2257; G11; G11C; G11C29/00; G11C29/56

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim 279 words
In an apparatus comprising a plurality of expert knowledge tables associated respectively with a plurality of failure categories, each of the expert knowledge tables mapping relationships between a plurality of test patterns and a plurality of fault modes, means for storing memories with a plurality of expert rules respectively associated with said expert knowledge tables, each of the stored expert rule memories defining a tree of successively traceable nodes interconnected by decision branches leading to a plurality of fault modes, each of the nodes defining one of said test patterns of the associated expert knowledge table and a corresponding expected value, a method of using said apparatus comprising the steps of: a) deriving a test result from an LSI (large scale integration) chip under test and analyzing the test result and identifying the test result as one of said failure categories; b) selecting one of said stored expert rule memories corresponding to the identified category; c) specifying one of the nodes of the selected stored expert rule memory corresponding to a chip failure; d) applying a test pattern defined by the specified node to said chip and deriving a result signal therefrom; e) comparing the result signal with the expected value defined by the specified node to produce a comparison result; f) tracing the tree of the selected stored expert rule memory according to the comparison result of step e) from the specified node to a subsequent node and specifying the subsequent node instead of the node previously specified; g) repeating the steps (d) to (f) until one of said fault modes is reached; and h) identifying said chip failure as the fault mode reached by the step (g).
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 279 words
In an apparatus comprising a plurality of expert knowledge tables associated respectively with a plurality of failure categories, each of the expert knowledge tables mapping relationships between a plurality of test patterns and a plurality of fault modes, means for storing memories with a plurality of expert rules respectively associated with said expert knowledge tables, each of the stored expert rule memories defining a tree of successively traceable nodes interconnected by decision branches leading to a plurality of fault modes, each of the nodes defining one of said test patterns of the associated expert knowledge table and a corresponding expected value, a method of using said apparatus comprising the steps of: a) deriving a test result from an LSI (large scale integration) chip under test and analyzing the test result and identifying the test result as one of said failure categories; b) selecting one of said stored expert rule memories corresponding to the identified category; c) specifying one of the nodes of the selected stored expert rule memory corresponding to a chip failure; d) applying a test pattern defined by the specified node to said chip and deriving a result signal therefrom; e) comparing the result signal with the expected value defined by the specified node to produce a comparison result; f) tracing the tree of the selected stored expert rule memory according to the comparison result of step e) from the specified node to a subsequent node and specifying the subsequent node instead of the node previously specified; g) repeating the steps (d) to (f) until one of said fault modes is reached; and h) identifying said chip failure as the fault mode reached by the step (g).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 51 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the steps of repeating the steps (a) to (h) for each of a plurality of chip failures so that each of the chip failures is identified as one of the fault modes, and making a statistical record of the identified fault modes.
Claim 4
Independent Claim 296 words
An apparatus for testing an LSI (large scale integration) chip, comprising: testing means for applying a test signal to an LSI chip and deriving therefrom an output signal; a plurality of expert knowledge tables associated respectively with a plurality of failure categories, each of the expert knowledge tables mapping relationships between a plurality of test patterns and a plurality of fault modes; a plurality of expert rule memories associated respectively with said expert knowledge tables, each of the expert rule memories defining a tree of successively traceable nodes interconnected by decision branches leading to the fault modes of the associated expert knowledge table, each of said nodes defining one of said test patterns of the associated expert knowledge table and an expected value; and control means for analyzing the output signal of said testing means and identifying the output signal as one of said failure categories, selecting one of said expert rule memories according to the identified failure category, specifying one of the nodes of the selected expert rule memory corresponding to a chip failure, causing said testing means to apply said test signal according to the test pattern defined by the specified node, comparing the output signal of said testing means with the expected value defined by the specified node in order to produce a first comparison result, tracing the tree of the selected expert rule memory according to the first comparison result to a subsequent node, causing said testing means to apply said test signal according to the test pattern defined by the subsequent node, comparing the output signal of said testing means with the expected value defined by said subsequent node to produce a second comparison result, and tracing said tree toward one of said fault modes according to the second comparison result.
Claim 5
Independent Claim 296 words
An apparatus for testing an LSI (large scale integration) chip, comprising: testing means for applying a test signal to an LSI chip and deriving therefrom an output signal; a plurality of expert knowledge tables associated respectively with a plurality of failure categories, each of the expert knowledge tables mapping relationships between a plurality of test patterns and a plurality of fault modes; a plurality of expert rule memories associated respectively with said expert knowledge tables, each of the expert rule memories defining a tree of successively traceable nodes interconnected by decision branches leading to the fault modes of the associated expert knowledge table, each of said nodes defining one of said test patterns of the associated expert knowledge table and an expected value; and control means for analyzing the output signal of said testing means and identifying the output signal as one of said failure categories, selecting one of said expert rule memories according to the identified failure category, specifying one of the nodes of the selected expert rule memory corresponding to a chip failure, causing said testing means to apply said test signal according to the test pattern defined by the specified node, comparing the output signal of said testing means with the expected value defined by the specified node in order to produce a first comparison result, tracing the tree of the selected expert rule memory according to the first comparison result to a subsequent node, causing said testing means to apply said test signal according to the test pattern defined by the subsequent node, comparing the output signal of said testing means with the expected value defined by said subsequent node to produce a second comparison result, and tracing said tree toward one of said fault modes according to the second comparison result.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 33 words
An apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the expert rules are derived from all possible combinations of "opens" and "shorts" between successive layers of a three-dimensional wiring structure of said LSI chip.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4817092A Cited
US4881230A Cited
US5127006A Cited
US5157668A Cited
US5107497A Cited
US5272704A Cited
US5337320A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1999-04-23 1999-10-23 2000-04-23 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2003-04-23 2003-10-23 2004-04-23 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2007-04-23 2007-10-23 2008-04-23 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag