Patent US5481733A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5481733A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for managing the power distributed to a disk drive in a laptop computer
Assignee: Panasonic Corp of North America
•
Filing: 1994-06-15
•
Granted: 1996-01-02
•
Expires: 2014-06-15
Abstract
Abstract A method for managing the power consumed by a disk drive in a portable laptop computer which includes quantizing predetermined periods of disk inactivity into states which are stored in a state table in memory. Based upon a history of disk accesses by a user, the number of transitions between each pair of states is counted and stored in memory. In view of this history, a future period of disk inactivity can be predicted and said prediction is compared with a threshold value. If the predicted period of disk inactivity is greater than the threshold value, the computer is automatically placed in a low power mode by spinning down the disk. If not, the disk continues to spin.
Inventors
- 👤 Frederick Douglis
- 👤 Brian D. Marsh
- 👤 Parameshwaran Krishnan
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 22:14
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F1/00; G06F1/26; G06F1/32; G06F1/3203; G06F1/3206; G06F1/3215; G06F1/3221; G06F1/3234; G06F1/325; G06F1/3268; G06F3/00; G06F3/06; G06F3/0601; G06F3/0668; G06F3/0671; G06F3/0673; Y; Y02; Y02D; Y02D10/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
250 words
A power conservation method for a computer apparatus that includes a memory and that contains a spinnable disk that exhibits intermittent periods of activity separated by periods of inactivity wherein said computer apparatus is in a high power consumption state or a low power consumption state lower than said high power consumption state and wherein periods of disk activity always take place when said computer apparatus is in said high power consumption state and periods of disk inactivity take place when said computer apparatus is in either said high power consumption state or said low power consumption state, the method including the steps of: quantizing predetermined periods of disk inactivity into a plurality of states, each said state representing a distinct range of time; storing in a table in said memory counts of a number of transitions between each pair of states while said apparatus has been in operation for a given period of time; predicting a time period of disk inactivity based upon a historical review of the previously stored counts for each pair of states; determining that said disk is in said predicted time period of disk inactivity; and placing the computer apparatus in said low power consumption state if power expenditure by said computer apparatus in said high power consumption state during the predicted time period of disk inactivity is determined to be greater than power expenditure by said computer apparatus between two periods of disk activity with an intervening one of said periods of disk inactivity.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
250 words
A power conservation method for a computer apparatus that includes a memory and that contains a spinnable disk that exhibits intermittent periods of activity separated by periods of inactivity wherein said computer apparatus is in a high power consumption state or a low power consumption state lower than said high power consumption state and wherein periods of disk activity always take place when said computer apparatus is in said high power consumption state and periods of disk inactivity take place when said computer apparatus is in either said high power consumption state or said low power consumption state, the method including the steps of: quantizing predetermined periods of disk inactivity into a plurality of states, each said state representing a distinct range of time; storing in a table in said memory counts of a number of transitions between each pair of states while said apparatus has been in operation for a given period of time; predicting a time period of disk inactivity based upon a historical review of the previously stored counts for each pair of states; determining that said disk is in said predicted time period of disk inactivity; and placing the computer apparatus in said low power consumption state if power expenditure by said computer apparatus in said high power consumption state during the predicted time period of disk inactivity is determined to be greater than power expenditure by said computer apparatus between two periods of disk activity with an intervening one of said periods of disk inactivity.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of: continuing to maintain the computer apparatus in said high power consumption state if power expenditure by said computer apparatus in said high power consumption state during the predicted period of disk inactivity is less than power expenditure by said computer apparatus between said two periods of disk activity with said intervening one of said periods of disk inactivity.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 2 further including the step of: changing the table of the number of transitions between each pair of states based on a change in the computer apparatus.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said method is for a plurality of spinnable disks further including the step of: storing a plurality of tables in said memory of the number of transitions between each pair of states, each table pertaining to a respective one of said plurality of spinnable disks.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 4 further including the step of: changing each of said plurality of tables responsive to a change in operating systems executing in said computer apparatus.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
84 words
A power conservation method according to claim 2, wherein said periods of disk activity with said intervening one of said periods of disk inactivity includes said computer apparatus a) first transitioning to the low power consumption state at the beginning of the predicted time period of disk inactivity, b) second transitioning back to the high power consumption state at the end of the predicted time period of disk inactivity and c) remaining in the lower power consumption state between the first and second transitioning.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of: storing said states into a table in said memory associated with said apparatus.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of: storing said predictions into a table in said memory.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of: storing in said memory a predetermined threshold value which when exceeded by a period of disk inactivity overrides placing the computer in said low power consumption state regardless of the predicted period of disk inactivity.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of: switching the apparatus from said low power consumption state to said high power consumption state in which said disk continues to spin as desired by a user regardless of the predicted period of disk inactivity.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of: spinning-up the disk prior to the next disk access based upon a prediction of when the next disk access will occur.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
87 words
A power conservation method according to claim 1, wherein said computer apparatus transitions between said two periods of disk activity with said intervening one of said periods of disk activity by a) first transitioning to the low power consumption state at the beginning of the predicted time period of disk inactivity, b) second transitioning back to the high power consumption state at the end of the predicted time period of disk inactivity and c) remaining in the lower power consumption state between the first and second transitioning.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4458273A
Cited
US4736263A
Cited
US4814905A
Cited
US4717968A
Cited
US5087994A
Cited
US4984103A
Cited
US4980836A
Cited
US5157560A
Cited
US5167024A
Cited
US5101311A
Cited
US5201059A
Cited
US5214543A
Cited
US5197055A
Cited
US5396635A
Cited
US5265077A
Cited
US5246479A
Cited
US5283702A
Cited
US5245595A
Cited
US5270992A
Cited
US5345347A
Cited
US5400190A
Cited
US5289097A
Cited
US5339445A
Cited
US5423046A
Cited
US5412519A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-01-01 | 1999-07-03 | 2000-01-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-01-01 | 2003-07-03 | 2004-01-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-01-01 | 2007-07-03 | 2008-01-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |